General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy didn't Howard Schultz run against Donald Trump?
Instead of running against the Democratic Party?
He cannot be taken seriously.
We can only assume that he supports the policies of Donald Trump over those of the Democratic Party.
One thing is for certain: He is no Democrat.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Is anyone in Corporate Media pressing him on that issue?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Im hopeful that after the election, and hopefully Hillary Clinton will be elected president, that we will begin to see a level of unity and people coming together, he said in an interview with CNNs Poppy Harlow on Facebook Live.
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation-politics/starbucks-howard-schultz-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president/
kentuck
(111,108 posts)Billionaires are beyond Party label. They support whoever can help them with their accumulation of wealth. Sort of like the "Democrat" Gary Cohn, who was Trump's first economic adviser. Very few join the Democratic Party for principles.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)dalton99a
(81,566 posts)He is certainly no friend of Democrats
oberliner
(58,724 posts)There is a great story about Schultz in there.
SunSeeker
(51,646 posts)He is an arrogant, out of touch, entitled rich asshole. Like Trump, he thinks he knows better than anyone else just because he's rich. His disaster of a rollout shows he doesn't know jack shit.
lark
(23,140 posts)He's against the Dems and trying to throw the race to orange assmouth to keep his money in his pocket, nothing else.
TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)spooky3
(34,466 posts)or self-destruct before too long. Im surprised that Schmidt got involved with something that, if it doesnt fizzle out, could help someone he purports to disdain remain in office.