General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsbobbieinok
(12,858 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,862 posts)and it looks like 1987. The strip was published from 1985 to 1995.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)When I blow up the bottom, it gets too blurry, if there's a date in it.
sandensea
(21,639 posts)It ran from '85 to '95, so it must be.
I remember the chagrin I felt when I heard it was being discontinued.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)It's too blurry for me to read, but it looks like a copyright sentence. ???
Anyway, that's eery that it's so applicable now.
sandensea
(21,639 posts)This reminds me of a jar of orange marmalade I once saw in an Italian grocery store in North Chicago.
The product itself looked great, and the label was something out of the Smithsonian. Very appealing.
But you could clearly make out that the grocer had tried to scratch out the expiration date, such that all I saw was 19*7 (this was in '95).
I took it home anyway, and it was the best orange marmalade I've ever had before or since.
Blecht
(3,803 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,359 posts)So....
Response to bobbieinok (Reply #3)
billh58 This message was self-deleted by its author.
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)yonder
(9,667 posts)forthemiddle
(1,381 posts)I remember how disappointed I was when it was discontinued.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,359 posts)of Bork to the SCOTUS. Do people feel that was too much?
Raven
(13,895 posts)a little different from a blackface?
mac56
(17,571 posts)Nowhere did I suggest what you just asked.