General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is a fight we dare not lose! Whitaker MUST be subpoenaed and, if necessary, DRAGGED before
Nadler's committee! And, we cannot simply "let it drop" if/when Barr is confirmed as AG.
The slimy pus-bag now called the "acting" AG and the slimier pus bag who gave him that title BOTH need to be brought to heel. We need to raise holy hell with any politician who dares to condone this.
Yes, I AM very angry and upset about Whitaker DARING to say, essentially, "I'll only answer easy meaningless questions" to Congressman Nadler and his committee. I believe this could be the inflection point which determines whether we ever see the Mueller report, i.e. whether the son of a bitch in our White House "gets away with it"!
harumph
(1,905 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,627 posts)I have a feeling he intends to lie his sweaty ass off.
Atticus
(15,124 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)we want him as close to sentient as is possible for him
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)McConnell needs at least till next Friday to make Barr the AG. This is what this is all about. They already know Whitaker will fold like a cheap chair.
duforsure
(11,885 posts)It will be used forever to obstruct anything with. Even republicans can understand this could happen to them too in the future.
OliverQ
(3,363 posts)since there is no way Whitaker will be held in contempt. Takes too long and will have to go through the courts.
theboss
(10,491 posts)I feel like we are in an era of escalating bad precedents starting back with Harry Reid and the filibuster.
royable
(1,264 posts)but you can't make him not lie, especially if he holds whatever he's either profited from or being blackmailed on dearer than ten lifetimes in prison.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Unless -- they are counting on being on a permanently winning side in the end. One where those on the winning side don't get prosecuted.
Grasswire2
(13,571 posts)....then we KNOW HOW IMPORTANT his testimony is.
Willing to fight the separation of powers to keep him from speaking under oath?
Must be really, really good stuff.