Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 11:55 PM Aug 2012

No Military Sons: For the First Time Since 1944, Neither Major Candidate has Military Background

This will be the first election since 1944 for which neither of the two major party candidates has any military service in his background. I offer the following information purely as an interesting set of data points, rather than to make any point. If there was a point to be made, I think it would be just another demonstration of the professionalization (which is to say, de-democratization) of the US military post-Vietnam; conversely, it could be a simple demonstration of the mass mobilization required by World War II (and its fading influence today. In any case, a fun set of facts to pore over:

In the 17 elections since 1944 (2012 inclusive),


  • Both major candidates have had some military service 11 times

  • Only one candidate has had military service 5 times

  • When only one candidate has military service, that candidate has won 2 times (Truman 1948, Nixon 1968) and lost three times (Bush 1992, Dole 1996, McCain 2008)

  • One candidate had only brief, non-combat related service (two year enlisted stint) 4 times(unlike many Republicans and journalists who liked to mock him, Michael Dukakis actually served in the United States Army)

  • At least one candidate served in a combat zone during a major conflict 13 times (including Gore, excluding Goldwater, though he flew resupply, excluding Carter).

  • Both candidates served in a combat zone during a major conflict only 2 times (1960 and 1972), excluding Johnson’s dubious stints as a sit-in on some bombing runs



1944: Roosevelt (No military service) v. Dewey (No military service)

1948: Truman (U.S. Army / World War I) v. Dewey (No military service)

1952 and 1956: Eisenhower (U.S. Army / World War II / European Theater of Operations) v. Stevenson (U.S. Navy / Enlisted) (1952 and 1956)

1960: Kennedy (U.S. Navy / World War II / Pacific Theater of Operations) v. Nixon (U.S. Navy / World War II / Pacific Theater of Operations)

1964: Johnson (U.S. Navy / Pacific Theater of Operations) v. Goldwater (U.S. Army Air Forces / World War II / Pacific Theater of Operations)

1968: Humphrey (No military service) v. Nixon (U.S. Navy / World War II / Pacific Theater of Operations)

1972: Nixon (U.S. Navy / World War II / Pacific Theater of Operations) v. McGovern (U.S. Army Air Corps / World War II / European Theater of Operations)

1976: Ford (U.S. Navy / World War II Pacific Theater of Operations) v. Carter (U.S. Navy / nuclear submarine officer)

1980: Carter (U.S. Navy / nuclear submarine officer) v. Reagan (U.S. Army Air Forces)

1984: Reagan (U.S. Army Air Forces) v. Mondale (U.S. Army/ enlisted)

1988: Bush (U.S. Navy—World War II / Pacific Theater) v. Dukakis (U.S. Army / enlisted)

1992: Clinton v. Bush (U.S. Navy—World War II / Pacific Theater of Operations)

1996: Clinton v. Dole (U.S. Army—World War II/ European Theater / Wounded in Action)

2000: Bush (Texas Air National Guard—Draft Dodger) v. Gore (U.S. Army—Vietnam)

2004: Bush (Texas Air National Guard—Draft Dodger) v. Kerry (U.S. Navy—Vietnam)

2008: McCain (U.S. Navy—Vietnam/ POW) v. Obama (No military service)

2012: Obama (No military service) v. Romney (No military service)
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No Military Sons: For the First Time Since 1944, Neither Major Candidate has Military Background (Original Post) alcibiades_mystery Aug 2012 OP
Romney Claims to have wanted to serve , so that counts as something doesn't it ? JI7 Aug 2012 #1
Interestingly, when a candidate has no military background, the claim of "desire to serve" alcibiades_mystery Aug 2012 #3
But Romney DID joint a Protest calling for sending other people to War JI7 Aug 2012 #7
And his sons were serving to get him elected so there's that. Ganja Ninja Aug 2012 #16
First time since 1940 that both President and VP nominees had no service bluestateguy Aug 2012 #2
Truman was also an artillery officer alcibiades_mystery Aug 2012 #6
Give a hat tip to Beau Biden, many years in the service, then compare the Romney 5. dimbear Aug 2012 #4
Has any of Mitt's five sons served? ProSense Aug 2012 #5
oh, yes, they "served". do you remember mittwit's comment during the 2008 campaign that niyad Aug 2012 #8
Romney took an exemption and protested for others to go to war in his place.... xocet Aug 2012 #9
FDR was Asst. Sec. of Navy 1913-1920.... Historic NY Aug 2012 #10
Yes, but not in the military himself alcibiades_mystery Aug 2012 #12
Maybe they can claim they served on a Battleship! yortsed snacilbuper Aug 2012 #11
"CINC, US Armed Forces, 2008-present." Robb Aug 2012 #13
Obama does... lame54 Aug 2012 #14
I understand what you're saying, but no alcibiades_mystery Aug 2012 #19
He does not. Commander in Chief is a civilian position. former9thward Aug 2012 #22
Neither Romney nor his sons or his father have ever served in the military. Ganja Ninja Aug 2012 #15
Well, slight correction here. Major Hogwash Aug 2012 #17
Since Dukakis served in the U.S. Army, you'd be wrong on that alcibiades_mystery Aug 2012 #18
Too bad... Ben_Caxton Aug 2012 #20
Did Carter serve glacierbay Aug 2012 #21

JI7

(89,250 posts)
1. Romney Claims to have wanted to serve , so that counts as something doesn't it ?
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 11:58 PM
Aug 2012

and Paul Ryan said he has experience because he voted to send people to war.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
3. Interestingly, when a candidate has no military background, the claim of "desire to serve"
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:03 AM
Aug 2012

has come out in the past. Humphrey in particular was rejected TWICE for health reasons while attempting to enlist.

I suspect Romney - who could have easily walked into any enlistment office in California and be sent directly to Quang Tri province when he left Stanford in 1966 - has no such record of health rejections.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
2. First time since 1940 that both President and VP nominees had no service
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:01 AM
Aug 2012

In 1944, Dewey's VP had WWI service.

In 1940 is the even better analogy to what we have now.

Only Joe Biden even has a child who served.

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
4. Give a hat tip to Beau Biden, many years in the service, then compare the Romney 5.
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:04 AM
Aug 2012

There's talk on one side, deeds on the other.

niyad

(113,323 posts)
8. oh, yes, they "served". do you remember mittwit's comment during the 2008 campaign that
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:21 AM
Aug 2012

the five sons were serving their country by working on his campaign?

xocet

(3,871 posts)
9. Romney took an exemption and protested for others to go to war in his place....
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:38 AM
Aug 2012

Saying that Romney has no military service is not saying enough. He is a bona fide chickenhawk.


Preppy protester: The moment a 19-year-old Mitt Romney demonstrated in favour of Vietnam War draft
By Graham Smith
UPDATED: 08:06 EST, 6 January 2012

...

Taken at the height of the swinging Sixties, Mr Romney holds a sign declaring 'Speak Out, Don't Sit In' as, alongside like-minded individuals, he proclaims his support for Lyndon Johnson's ever-expanding draft.

...

George Romney headed American Motors before becoming Michigan governor in 1963, a position he held for six years before being appointed Secretary of Housing and Urban Development by Richard Nixon.

Ironically, he later had a change of heart and turned against the Vietnam War.

His pro-war son, meanwhile, never served in south-east Asia because his status as a Mormon missionary exempted him from the draft.
...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2083002/Mitt-Romney-19-demonstrated-favour-Vietnam-War-draft.html#ixzz24L9R0JxY

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
10. FDR was Asst. Sec. of Navy 1913-1920....
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 02:01 AM
Aug 2012

while a civilian position he did take the lead during WWI & created the Navy Reserve.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
12. Yes, but not in the military himself
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 08:20 AM
Aug 2012

I did turn over this point as I constructed the list, though. I wanted to be fairly strict about what I considered a military background for the purpose of the demonstration. Thanks!

Ganja Ninja

(15,953 posts)
15. Neither Romney nor his sons or his father have ever served in the military.
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 08:47 AM
Aug 2012

George worked as a production coordinator and administrator for the auto industry in WWII.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
17. Well, slight correction here.
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 09:05 AM
Aug 2012

When only one candidate has military service, that candidate has won 2 times (Truman 1948, Nixon 1968) and lost three times (Bush 1992, Dole 1996, McCain 2008)

I would say --

When only one candidate has military service, that candidate has won 3 times (Truman 1948, Nixon 1968, Bush 1988) . . .

But then Bush lost in 1992.

I also don't consider Ronnie Raygun to be a veteran.
He may have served in the Hollywood division making movies for the Department of Defense, but he was not a member of the Army Air Corps, as far as I am concerned.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
18. Since Dukakis served in the U.S. Army, you'd be wrong on that
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 09:25 AM
Aug 2012

Bush won in 1988, but in 1988 he wasn't facing an opponent who hadn't served.

Reagan's service was indeed a question I turned over before listing. My criterion there was fairly simple: had he actually passed through training and served in a unit. The answer in both cases is yes. Reagan was in the military for eight years, in fact, with his service predating World War II, and he attained the rank of Captain. That's military service by any criteria, I think, even if he was making movies in Hollywood rather than flying planes over the Pacific. Indeed, I think Johnson's service is in many ways more dubious than Reagan's, since Johnson joined as a visiting Congressperson and already well-known politico, and was essentially sent to the Pacific on a fact-finding mission, though certainly as a commissioned officer.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No Military Sons: For the...