General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGee, I guess this means the Jill Steins, Susan Sarandons, Cornell West, and others were wrong
Aristus
(66,434 posts)still_one
(92,317 posts)Response to still_one (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)- "He will fuck up so badly that the people will kick off a revolution!"
- "But... he will harm a lot of people."
- "Yes! But it will kick off the revolution!"
world wide wally
(21,749 posts)I know they are full of shit
Squinch
(50,987 posts)Also the moment they disparage social reform.
world wide wally
(21,749 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,342 posts)You can be sure their only source of information is The One True Candidate.
So much easier to surrender your own initiative and become a sponge, regurgitating only the substance you have been given, questioning not.
uponit7771
(90,348 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)still_one
(92,317 posts)tinrobot
(10,909 posts)But yes, they were wrong about a lot of things in 2016.
Maru Kitteh
(28,342 posts)It's quite illuminating.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)They did everything in their power to make this nightmare shitshow a reality out of nothing but pure hatred against HRC...
They are all subhuman scum.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,342 posts)Sarandon didn't, I think, say Trump was a good person - she said she wanted him to wreck the system by being awful, didn't she? I thought the criticism of her was that she'd be OK in a failing country, being rich, but that the ordinary person would suffer.
So if something has proved her wrong, what?