Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy were the repubs allowed to display large negative posters about
Michael Cohen? One indicated that he was a liar and his pants were on fire. They are truly the bullies on the playground. So childish!!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 854 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why were the repubs allowed to display large negative posters about (Original Post)
mfcorey1
Feb 2019
OP
Whiskeytide
(4,463 posts)1. Was the spelling accurate? n/t
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)3. That's funny!!
mucifer
(23,569 posts)2. this behavior appeals to their deplorables and gets them more votes
harumph
(1,915 posts)4. I saw that in the nytimes this morning...
It seemed to me that the signs were a bit too "wordy" for the
intended audience. There were 3 signs with lots of words - full paragraphs
even.
If they had simply read "Cohen," "Bad!," "Sad!" and then maybe their
short attention span followers would get it.