Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPlease stop saying 'Voter ID' when you mean disenfranchising 'polling place Photo ID restrictions'!
Words Matter: 'Legitimate Rape' = 'Voter ID'
Voting rights advocates must stop saying 'Voter ID' when they mean disenfranchising 'polling place Photo ID restrictions'...
Please get it straight: the concern is about "polling place Photo ID restrictions" not "Voter ID".
I've tried to warn progressives about this for years, to little avail, but discussing concerns about "Voter ID" is akin (pun intended?) to talking about "Legitimate Rape".
After all, everyone is against "legitimate rape"! But using that phrase, as most instinctively seem to understand, allows for the misleading subconscious notion idea that there is some other kind of rape that is less "legitimate".
In the same way, "Voter ID" is quite reasonable sounding -- after all, who could be against the reasonable sounding idea of identifying oneself before voting? -- but Republican-enacted polling place Photo ID restrictions are a different matter all together. Republicans know that very well, even if Democrats still can't seem to get it.
Both phrases, "Legitimate Rape" and "Voter ID", each reasonable sounding enough, miss the point and are tremendously misleading. Republican vote suppressors know that, so they love it when Democrats and progressives and voting rights advocates use the phrase "Voter ID" instead of "polling place Photo ID restrictions."
The fact is, the majority of states <i>already</i> require some form of reasonable identification of voters before voting, at least at the polling place. For that matter, federal law -- the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 -- already requires "Voter ID" in all 50 states when voting for the first time at the polling place, if the voter did not register in person and present ID at that time...
FULL STORY: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9500
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1494 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Please stop saying 'Voter ID' when you mean disenfranchising 'polling place Photo ID restrictions'! (Original Post)
BradBlog
Aug 2012
OP
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)1. "Polling place photo ID restrictions" is a bit cumbersome
I prefer to call it "photo ID voter suppression."
Johonny
(20,851 posts)2. You mean Jim Crow law
gollygee
(22,336 posts)3. How about "ID Poll Tax"
Fewer words.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)4. I either call it Poll Tax or Jim Crow. So should everyone else! nt
GigiMommy
(5,039 posts)5. Great point!! n/t