General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe Need a Landslide. We Need Hillary Clinton as President Obama's VP.
The election is too close in the battleground states. It should not even be close.
We need voter enthusiasm just like we had in '08 in November '12. Hillary Clinton brings that.
We need to overcome voter-suppression tricks by massive turn-out. Hillary Clinton brings that.
We need Democrats who may not vote this time voting. Hillary Clinton brings that.
We need our Democrats to keep control of the Senate. Hillary Clinton brings that.
We need to win back the House of Representatives. Hillary Clinton brings that.
We need a Congress that will work with President Obama for 4 years. Hillary Clinton brings that.
We must defeat the GOP's financial advantage with turn-out. Hillary Clinton brings that.
We need millions of Americans tuning into our National Convention. Hillary Clinton brings that.
We need President Obama continuing his transformative presidency. Hillary Clinton brings that.
We need massive crowds like we had in '08 when Obama campaigns. Hillary Clinton brings that.
For the sake of the nation, we need a friggin' landslide. Hillary Clinton brings that.
WE NEED President Obama to have four more years. And yes, Hillary Clinton brings that.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Biden is just fine.
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)Hillary can.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)FarPoint
(12,409 posts)Bill Clinton will also do his share too. It's all about the timing.
Floyd_Gondolli
(1,277 posts)Because there is an unwritten rule that cabinet members don't campaign or get involved in electoral politics.
Chiyo-chichi
(3,581 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 24, 2012, 03:43 PM - Edit history (1)
INdemo
(6,994 posts)Medicare and other social programs.Bet he carries VA also..
Biden is just fine on the ticket
snooper2
(30,151 posts)I'm always looking to make easy money
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Florida's seniors are rightly skeptical of his Medicare plan. Similarly, the many Federal workers in northern Va. won't like his plan to slash the federal workforce.
So while Biden may not be able to deliver Florida or Virginia, Ryan can.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Even if Obama wins in 2012, Biden is not going to run in 2016. If historical precedent is any indication, the odds of us winning in 2016 are not good. We have never had three Democratic administrations in a row since FDR/Truman, and none before that going back to the Civil War (Of course Gore actually won in 2000, but he was cheated out of his victory). At any rate, if Obama wins this year, in 2016 it would be one of our "new faces" versus one of their "new faces", and, unfortunately, the historical precedent is that their "new face" will win (along with lots of House and Senate seats). So what I am saying is that I, personally, would have preferred to have a "rising star" in the VP slot this time around to make a name for him/herself and perhaps give us an edge in 2016.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)I doubt if he is really considering a serious run
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)I think your analysis is spot-on, but I also thing the worst place for one of our "new faces" is in the Vice President's role. What we need is to keep the Senate and regain the House. And then have Reid and Pelosi appoint one of these up-and-comers to key leadership positions. Note that I don't think Reid should step aside for that person - He's in a lightning-rod role, and that's not good for someone who wants to run for President in four years. Same with Pelosi.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)We were cheated too. Actually the whole world was cheated.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)geez.
Hillary would rally the base, but nobody else.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)compared to Biden vs. Ryan
Women would vote Hillary 2 to 1
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... "he chose the wrong guy last time, he just admitted it."
Besides, I'm fine with Joe.
kysrsoze
(6,022 posts)F**k that sh*t.
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)Do you want four years of Romeny and Ryan?
You'd better think about that long and hard.
kysrsoze
(6,022 posts)That shows nothing but weakness and desperation. Hillary is fine as Sec'y Of State, and Biden will wipe the debate floor with Ryan's face. It's only a week or so after the announcement, and their party is already turning into an even bigger mess.
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts).
kysrsoze
(6,022 posts)Obama will deserve to lose. The campaign is constantly thrashing R/R. I guarantee repubs will turn out in droves to vote against Obama/Clinton.
KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)Obama wins if people are not disenfranchised en masse via voter roll purges, ID requirements, and reduced polling locations & hours.
CabCurious
(954 posts)Hillary would not galvanize additional support.
Hillary would not be able to run in 2016 to extend a legacy.
A change in VP would not boost the ticket whatsoever.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)You have heard the saurove underground rumor mill at work. You're smarter than that.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Biden is fine.
Have a great day!
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,731 posts)SERIOUSLY??
Just aside from the fact that she's already said very emphatically that she doesn't want to do it, I don't see what she brings that Biden doesn't have. Yes, she's very smart and capable - I don't mean to put her down - but if you think she'd improve Obama's chances you must have forgotten the way she was treated during Bill's presidency. The right wing hates her as much as they hate Obama. With her on the ticket the haters would be energized even more; they'd be doubly energized with hate and the flying monkeys would be out in droves, doing anything - and I do mean anything - to defeat the ticket. Biden is just as smart and competent as Hillary and he doesn't inspire demented hatred the way she does.
Biden does a great job, and he's a very effective campaigner. If Obama were to switch running mates at this point it would make him look weak and desperate.
This is a very bad, dumb idea. But I'm not concerned because it isn't going to happen.
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)She's the single most popular politican in the country. Landslide.
President Obama wins. That's the goal.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,731 posts)Running mates don't win elections; they can harm a ticket but they do little to help.
Anyhow, it won't happen.
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts).
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,731 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)How many people do you think there are that are saying "I'll only vote for Obama if Hillary is his VP"? What do you base that on? How many people do you estimate would look at a last-minute change like this, and think "Obama is panicking, he's resorting to pulling a stunt because he was bound to lose - I think I won't vote for an unstable presidential team">
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)Just wondering...
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)Why don't you look at the thousands of posts I generated in 2008 against Hillary and for Obama before you makes such a slur.
I want to win in November. It's sort of important. Winning.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)eg If Al Gore Doesn't Jump In...Then I Will Vote for Hillary in the California Primary
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)It will take you days to get through them all.
I know it is inconvenient for you to believe I was one of Obama's biggest supporters here all of 2008, but your cherry-picking a 2007 post ignores the facts.
It's OK. You can believe what you want to believe because it's apparently important that you falsely discredit me.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)after several saying you thought she'd make an excellent VP, back in August 2008. Some of those did say "everyone knows I was against Hillary earlier", but I'm not sure we kept such a close track of your preferences.
My overall impression is that you change your mind fairly often. You don't attack Democrats, but your preferences aren't fixed.
On edit: you still haven't explained where the electoral magic comes from. Which Democratic voters are saying they must have Hillary as VP?
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)We (Democrats) lose because we don't vote with crazed foam dripping from our mouths like the Republicans do.
Look at the last mid-terms. We lost because Democrats did not show up at the last national election. And the tea-party idiots took over the House of Representatives and stalled President Obama for the last two years.
Obama will not have all the youth turning out like they did in 2008. That magic, while still there, is not going to be like it was.
That's the issue for me.
Look at the enthusisam gap between GOP voters and our voters. It concerns me.
Barack with Hillary would be a landslide and sweep Congress, too.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)It's true that Hillary's personal ratings are excellent - up in the high 60s 'favorable' (I guess she gets pretty much all Democrats, and a lot of independents must like what she's done as SoS - maybe even the occasional Republican has come round to her). But Biden has been the announced VP candidate for some time. The first words greeting you on barackobama.com are:
"Now that we know who's on both teams, it's time to pick a side. Join the Obama-Biden team."
A change now would be taken as "my god, Obama doesn't think the current VP is up to it/he's stabbed him in the back/something awful has happened..."
TBF
(32,063 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)The search function should be working.
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)Thanks for stepping up.
I love President Obama.
I want President Obama to win. The alternative is unthinkable.
I hope I don't get you in trouble here.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)You worked hard for Obama when the dust settled way back when.
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)Obama rocks.
I just want him to run away with the election, the House and the Senate so he can govern without the obstructions.
I didn't expect to be loved for my OP. It's how I truly see this.
And I think it may happen. Seriously.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Honey, I *am* trouble!
patrice
(47,992 posts)women? and that a woman at the top is all we need to insure our vote?
We aren't children.
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)You can't project something (paternalism) that isn't there.
The OP is clear that Hillary is popular with the American people. That would include men and women.
patrice
(47,992 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)when he says that he wants Obama to win in the worst way. He does. He was also a Hillary supporter once long ago. Nothing wrong with that.
I believe that he sees this as the best option for Obama winning. I don't. But it doesn't matter. I like David and I know his heart is in the right place. And it is not up to any of us anyway.
It did bring back memories though and some old jokes. Shouldn't be at David's expense though. I hope he took some of the frivolity as just that - having fun with some old stuff.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)They were a distinct group and nice people got smeared with that label who did not go from Hillary to McCain, which was the PUMA astroturf ratf*ck...thing, lol. Oh, the times of madness!
(I think Biden should stay VP, just for the record. I just didn't like seeing David get harshed on.)
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)about people like David. I'll certainly be more careful in the future because you're right, he doesn't deserve that label. He was laughing at them right along with the rest of us, or alternately shaking his head like WTF?
It was a crazy time, wasn't it? DUers with puppets going off the deep end for good. Wonder where that guy is...
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 25, 2012, 12:05 PM - Edit history (1)
DU last month?
Just seems odd, you know?
Lotta newer DUers attacking long-term DUers, just like you are doing, casting doubt upon a DUer's character. It almost seems organized...
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)lob1
(3,820 posts)But why would Hillary want to be VP? Seems to me, that's a step down from Sec of State. That's a real job, and VP isn't.
David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)That's the goal. Winning.
lob1
(3,820 posts)David Zephyr
(22,785 posts)Losing in November is not a luxury. Helping President Obama win even Republican women and clinching the White House and Congress for four years is not "stepping down".
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)You have to be high. I have a family -mom, 2 sisters, SiL - who have fits when her name is even mentioned..
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)he doesn't operate that way.
He'll win the honorable way, the right way. No obvious ploys to bring in a supposed ringer to get a few votes.
He'd lose far more votes than he'd gain.
Hillary lost for a reason. You've forgotten. It just seems she'd be really good, because she's good at her current job. She'll run for the #1 spot, if she runs at all. Right now, she's tired and wants to rest awhile.
Brother Buzz
(36,440 posts)Just an observation that isn't necessarily germane to your post, so call me Mister Tangent
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)marmar
(77,081 posts)...... It's not like she'd bring something fresh or new to the campaign. I think you're overestimating her ability to excite voters.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)No.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79736.html?hp=r12
There is always an inherent danger in accepting your mortal enemy's advice.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Senate and House go Dem in a landslide with a woman on the Obama ticket, and they know it!
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Tricks are for kids. And Palin & Cheney are kids.
It's a RW meme to stir up trouble in the opposing party and try to get them fighting with each other.
This is silly. It won't happen...Obama dumping his right hand man weeks before the election, for no legitimate reason, even. Obama doesn't operate that way, in the first place. Second, it wouldn't help the election. It would cause him to LOSE it.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Meant to destroy the election and stir things up and distract.
Tikki
(14,557 posts)We are just fine with our VP Biden.
Tikki
eissa
(4,238 posts)Biden has been an exceptional VP, and can reach groups that Hillary simply can't. It's not 2008 -- that energy you're talking about can't be replicated. I think Obama has made it clear that he can be a champion of women's issues like no one else can. Biden connects with workers, older whites, and those in rural areas better than Hillary could. He's an asset to the ticket.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)in then Hillary on the ticket sure as hell won't.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)The Democrats seem to have the female vote, the hispanic vote, the progressive vote, the gay vote, the union vote, the Af. American vote, the Asian vote, the poor vote. What's up for grabs is the senior vote and the independent vote. The Dems are hopefully making headway with the seniors because of Ryan.
The Republicans have the white rich man vote, the well off middle aged man vote, still soccer moms? not sure about that one. But these groups vote reliably.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,742 posts)So am I.
woodsprite
(11,916 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)Away from Ryan, rape and tax returns?
No fucking way.
This is a joke, right?
DemocratsForProgress
(545 posts)seems about right, IMHO.
DemocratsForProgress
(545 posts)Very exciting.
CabCurious
(954 posts)CabCurious
(954 posts)Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Can't quite...
Response to DefenseLawyer (Reply #40)
patrice This message was self-deleted by its author.
LeftofObama
(4,243 posts)There is something about VP Biden that is scaring them shitless. I don't know what it is, but I assume it's because they are afraid to put ryan up against him in the VP debate. Anyhow, SOS Clinton has already said she's not interested and that's good enough for me.
CabCurious
(954 posts)And Hillary is retiring.
Stinky The Clown
(67,807 posts)xmas74
(29,674 posts)but I wouldn't replace Biden. It reeks of desperation.
Besides, I actually tend to like Biden even better than Obama. Don't get me wrong-I'm fine with Obama. I just like that bit of "give 'em hell" attitude that Biden tends to have.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,731 posts)Except maybe among ex-Pumas. Biden is genuine, approachable, and can really work a crowd. Hillary, not so much.
Anyhow, it's not going to happen.
If Sarah Palin thinks Biden should be kicked off the ticket, what does that tell you?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)I'm really hoping she has a change of heart and decides to run.
TBF
(32,063 posts)but I think we're good with this ticket. Never have been a fan of Biden but he has done fine in his role and it would look bad to switch. Obama can carry this.
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)However, she has not yet run for any elective office.
Let her start on a city council.
Once she's worked her way to Governor or Senator, then she may become a serious candidate, at least for me.
I've come to the belief that too many of our presidential contenders did not spend enough time in first line elective office to have a real feel for people. I know that I'm in the minority here, but to me, none of Obama, Clinton or Edwards had that grass roots experience. Obama came closest, but I'd be happier if he'd been an alderman before becoming a state senator. He'd be a bit dirtier politically, but perhaps more savvy.
TBF
(32,063 posts)amandabeech
(9,893 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Sorry. It just felt unfinished somehow.
madokie
(51,076 posts)Look at the number of donations that President Obama has gotten compared to rMoney/ryan.
Not the money but the numbers of donations
Look at the pictures of the turn out everywhere the President goes compared to the pukes manies rmoney and ryan
I won't believe we're even in trouble until I see the votes being counted and it shows the pukes are winning then I'll believe its more rrrove's machine manipulations rather than actual votes
I don't see a problem myself other than thievery
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)and we wouldn't get a 'landslide' if Hillary were on the ticket. It would probably be about the same. Sorry to bust your bubble.
riverbendviewgal
(4,253 posts)she is a fantastic woman....and should run in 2016.....if she wants.
Joe Biden is a great man. He and Obama are a good team.
sellitman
(11,607 posts)Besides in my opinion Hillary was a nasty opponent. Not in a productive way either.
Oh, and by the way... I love Joe.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)liberaltrucker
(9,129 posts)FSogol
(45,488 posts)cliffordu
(30,994 posts)GREAT post!!!
HASHAHHAHAHAhahaha HAHahahahAHaH
mike_c
(36,281 posts)eom
Raster
(20,998 posts)I think not.
Auggie
(31,173 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Otherwise it is simply a stupid idea.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)No.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)...dude, no. You're being silly.
REP
(21,691 posts)juajen
(8,515 posts)However, I believe Obama and Biden are a good ticket, and that Hillary needs to prepare for her run in 2016. I am not upset at all about his competency in case he has to take over for some reason either.
juajen
(8,515 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)We were looking for "utter nonsense." But thanks for playing!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Not this shit again. Nice try.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 24, 2012, 02:32 PM - Edit history (1)
Occulus
(20,599 posts)I want the Clintons out of politics.
Response to David Zephyr (Original post)
Post removed
quinnox
(20,600 posts)If this was going to be done, and I think there is some merit to the idea of energizing a demoralized base by replacing Biden with Hillary, then it should have been done months ago.
Now, it would smack of desperation. I'm afraid we are stuck with what we have, and win or lose, that is what we have to deal with. Obama is vulnerable and might lose the election, bottom-line, and there is not much we can do about it except vote and hope for the best.
proud patriot
(100,706 posts)I find it an odd thing to suggest
tularetom
(23,664 posts)You know the women's vote he was in so much danger of losing because Batromney and Robin had such a high favorability among women.
It was a dumb idea four years ago and it's still a dumb idea.
spanone
(135,843 posts)OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)Despite the fact that Newt Gingrich now talks about Bill Clinton like a longtime friend, as opposed to somene he villified and attempted to impeach, the reason "Dump Biden/Bring on Hillary" has become a RW meme is that the wingers still have an arsenal of unused Hillary ammo left over from 2008. They want to drag up all of the 90s Rose Law Firm/Vince Foster crap again.
I'd love to have her take one last shot in 2016, though.
emilyg
(22,742 posts)former-republican
(2,163 posts)Now it would look like desperation
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)and then the whole world tuned in in anticipation
Biden should be the first one promoting the change, of course.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)I know that the endless "put Hillz on the ticket" was going to happen the minute she was not picked as VP. But it gets annoying. Obama is happy with Joe, I adore Joe. The most genuine and real politician out there. And I do respect and like Hillary as well. But enough is enough. Respect Obama's decision.
Hillary is popular because she doesn't have to do anything relating to domestic issues and she is not an idiot like Rumsfeld. She has already said many times she does not want to be VP and that she is exhausted from endlessly traveling the world as SOS. If she wants to run in 2016 that is fine but she does not need to be VP to do it.
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)Don't get me wrong. I like her. But she's nowhere near as popular as you seem to have convinced yourself she is.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)<----------------
Sorry, David. Switching VPs is a sign of weakness and fear. Even a hint of that, and it's game over.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)If Obama were to ask Biden to step aside (and pick ANYONE ELSE) Obama would appear weak and indecisive and unable to pick the right people to help govern the nation. That does NOT instill confidence
If Biden were to voluntarily resign to make room for Clinton, (or ANYONE ELSE), it would b perceived as abandoning the ship. Presumably because of corruption, cronyism, disenchantment with with Obama over a million things. That does NOT instill confidence.
I happen to like Biden, and he staying on the ticket is much more productive than playing the old switcheroo.
ps....I would have liked to see her on the original ticket, but that simply is history and there is absolutely no point to dwelling on it. I just think changing now would be disastrous.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)That's the only way Dems keep the White House.
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)ecstatic
(32,707 posts)How about Clinton/Booker?
aquart
(69,014 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Or, too much.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)it helps.
DawgHouse
(4,019 posts)I supported Clinton in 2008 and I still think she would have made (and will make) and excellent president some day. But right now, nothing needs to change, Obama and Biden are going to do great things and will win this election!
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)to run against the "legitimate rape" agenda
leveymg
(36,418 posts)in serious trouble?
Sends the wrong message. Divisive. Forget it.
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)Seriously. How does Hillary deliver the House?
What we DON'T need is for the campaign to go off-message for three weeks because Obama dumped Biden. Hillary Clinton brings that.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)and summarily dismissed.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)No offense, but this would ultimately deliver Obama a landslide loss. Anyone who thinks otherwise is absolutely fooling themselves. At this stage in the race, if Obama dropped Biden for Clinton, it would go over about as well as McGovern dropping Eagleton for Shriver - and we know how that turned out. Obama would be painted as an alarmist whose campaign is in the last throes. He would be done. It would go down as one of the worst political stunts in American presidential history.
IF Obama wanted Hillary, this move would have happened months ago - not a mere two months before the election. This isn't amateur hour here, folks - this is a goddamn presidential election. Desperate moves like this only prove how desperate of a candidate you are and Americans won't support a desperate candidate - just ask McCain, Mondale and soon, Governor Romney.
TBF
(32,063 posts)I admire her a great deal, and will if she runs in 2016, but 2 months before the election would be a really bad time to ditch your VP of 4 years. It honestly makes me wonder about the dude who posted the OP.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)It's not going to happen and it would make Obama look A) like a dick, B) desperate and C) weak if he picked Hillary after not selecting her in '08 and then keeping Biden on the ticket throughout most of 2012. You just don't do that. It wouldn't fly and wouldn't galvanize voters.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Biden is a pit bull when it comes to debating and will make mince meat of Ryan.
You stick with the winning combination that got you to the big game!
JohnnyRingo
(18,636 posts)I'm not even sure why anyone would wish it on her. People seem to assume it's what she aspires to do.
Regardless, the GOP strategists would pounce so fast Obama wouldn't know what hit him.
Karl Rove would reach a level of elation unseen since Jesus walked on water.
There was a reason Hillary was the prefered candidate of Rush limbaugh. He has an entire file cabinet of anti-Clinton paranoia that he hasn't even used yet.
Having said that, I love Ms Clinton and am glad she has this opportunity to retire on a high note.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)but a Center Right Dem...(Delaware/Banking) but, I agree with you. Not time to do this now since Biden is out there whipping what's left of the left (Labor) to get on board with our President.
Hillary is much different from what we "non-AIPAC" supporting Americans thought she would be.
It would be horrible to put her in as VEEP when she's become a supporter of "WARS ACROSS THE WORLD" spreading a view that's a total opposite to those of us who want to end these Wars for Oil, Minierals and the rest of the Commodities!
Enough if enough of the DLC/DNC/Third Way Model. It didn't work any better than Reagan/Bush/Greenspan has.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)I think he did a lousy job running the Judiciary Committee hearing, but he voted No.
flvegan
(64,408 posts)Male purty overload!!
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)if she wants to work part time obama can appoint her to be a special ambassador
KoKo
(84,711 posts)I've been shocked at her since she's SOS...and I could not support that. Every time I see or read a statement from her...chills go down my spin over what she is....and what a warmonger she has become. (and, I was a total Clinton supporter and even through the Monica years and lost friends and family members over my support of them.) I no longer feel kindly to either Bill or Hillary for their actions in the past years. Sorry...and it's devastating to me that I feel that way about them....but I do.
BTW: Personally, David....it's nice to see you posting here again. That we differ doesn't mean that I don't still have high regard, respect for your opinions.
But....that we are on real different sides on this one.
Peace!
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)and the low information voters would react to nothing but that.
Hillary for VP is the way to insure a defeat.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)Biden is doing a yeoman's job as VP.
Biden is doing a yeoman's job as VP.
Fuck this failed Clinton dynasty bullshit.
PB
Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)schedule she's kept for the last four years. If she's going to run for president in 2016 a break from the administration would probably be the best thing she could do because there will probably be some highly unpopular decisions over the next 4 years. Let her rest and recover-then get ready to steamroll her way into the White House in 2016. Or not, at her discretion-I really wouldn't blame her if she just retired. But I do believe she'll run-and win then.
I agree she'd be a great vice presidental candidate this year but Obama doesn't have to have her to win and it serves her career (and our future) better for her to bow out for a break. Plus the media would interpret it as desperation. At least thats how I see it right now.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Who would vote for a disloyal betrayer? That would be the ultimate betrayal. Dumping his confidante and loyal V.P. just WEEKS before the election, for the obvious sake of some votes.
The grass seems greener on the other side. It's not. Hillary lost for a reason.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)1.) there are a lot more "PUMAs" out there then I originally thought.
2.) many of them are engaged in magical thinking
Enrique
(27,461 posts)i disagree with OP, but I will kick anyway
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)I think you got your answer to your suggestion.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)I supported Obama in the primaries because he wasn't Hillary. You think she's going to cause a huge enthusiasm rush with people to the right of me (who thinks he's caved to conservative policy in too many cases).
No. Steady as she goes.
Botany
(70,516 posts)Biden has done a good job as Veep, he is an asset to the President, and
Hillary has said publicly she wants to relax and take it easy for awhile.
rateyes
(17,438 posts)Obama in a landslide is already gonna happen.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)and be a decided disadvantage. And I say that as someone who wanted Hillary as the 08 nominee.
We need to win. And to do that we need to hammer Romney and Ryan on their radicalism and their lying and their plans to destroy medicare and social security.
Alduin
(501 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,794 posts)Obama/Biden will win come November. Bank on it.
The other side has NOTHING to offer the American people other than their white skin.
Thanks for playing, though. Come back with that question 2+ years from now when the issue of who the Democratic nominees for POTUS and VPOTUS will be comes up.