Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMueller reply to Manafort's defense filing. (Bet Rachel talks about this tonite)
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5759638-Mueller-reply-to-Manafort-VA-sentencing-memo.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1195 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mueller reply to Manafort's defense filing. (Bet Rachel talks about this tonite) (Original Post)
triron
Mar 2019
OP
Bet she does too. A great read for those who like legal filings. eom
IllinoisBirdWatcher
Mar 2019
#1
IllinoisBirdWatcher
(2,315 posts)1. Bet she does too. A great read for those who like legal filings. eom
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,414 posts)2. and the original PDF
From the link in the OP:
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/5759638/Mueller-reply-to-Manafort-VA-sentencing-memo.pdf
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)3. From the very first page
"[D]efendant exercised his constitutional right to trial in this matter and contested the facts and his guilt. That alone undermines any reduction for acceptance of responsibility."
But it does on from there to roast Manafort's lame arguments for another 16 terrific pages.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)4. Well, this thread sank fast
But I'll try again. How about this conclusion from the "Acceptance of Responsibility" section:
Manafort seeks leniency for having to forfeit the vast majority of his assets earned over a lifetime, Doc. 317 at 6, without any recognition that he profited handsomely from those crimes over that same lifetime or that the property was not his if obtained through criminal activity. And neither the Court, nor the government, can be sure of the full extent of Manaforts assets because he has failed to submit a financial statement to either this Court or the Court in District of Columbiayet another example that he has failed to accept responsibility in a prosecution where he was convicted of hiding assets. Further, unlike most defendants who appear in tax cases, Manafort has not paid any restitution to the Treasury Department and still owes more than $6 million.
In the "Recividism" section:
The defendant argues that he presents no risk of recidivism . . .given the harsh lesson [he] has already learned, especially in light of his age. Doc. 317 at 24. There is no reason to believe this is so, and Manafort cites no evidence.
That's legalese for "Bu-u-u-ull shit!"
Really, go read it when you have a little time. The attorney who got to write the reply brief had a lot of fun that they usually don't have.