General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWaPo AUGUST 2018: "The extraordinary bias of the judge in the Manafort trial"
A retired U.S. District Court Judge, Nancy Gertner, had Ronald Reagan-appointed Judge T.S. Ellis IIIs number some 7 months ago. This bastard has been on board with 45 all along.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/opinions/the-extraordinary-bias-of-the-judge-in-the-manafort-trial/2018/08/16/aca48040-a16c-11e8-83d2-70203b8d7b44_story.html
The extraordinary bias of the judge in the Manafort trial
The Washington Post
By Nancy Gertner
August 16, 2018
Nancy Gertner, a retired U.S. District Court judge in Massachusetts, is a lecturer at Harvard Law School.
It is not unusual for judges to intervene in court proceedings from time to time to direct the lawyers to move the case along or to admonish them that evidence is repetitive. The judge's role is to act not as a "mere moderator," as the Supreme Court noted in Herron v. Southern Pacific in 1931, but as the "governor of the trial" responsible for ensuring the proper conduct of all participants.
The performance of U.S. District Court Judge T.S. Ellis III in the trial of Paul Manafort on bank fraud and tax evasion charges has been decidedly unusual.
During the trial, Ellis intervened regularly, and mainly against one side: the prosecution. The judge's interruptions occurred in the presence of the jury and on matters of substance, not courtroom conduct. He disparaged the prosecution's evidence, misstated its legal theories, even implied that prosecutors had disobeyed his orders when they had not.
Under the Code of Conduct for U.S. judges, a judge is supposed to be fair and impartial, as well as "patient, dignified, respectful and courteous" to those in his courtroom. The rule's concern is as much about the appearance of justice as its reality.
<snip>
For now, we have only the extraordinary evidence of Ellis's conduct during the 12-day trial. The judge continually interrupted the prosecution's questioning of witnesses, prompting lead prosecutor Greg Andres to pointedly note: "Your honor stops us and asks us to move on." Ellis pressed the prosecution to rush through testimony about important financial documents. He made critical comments about prosecution evidence and strategy all in front of the jury.
Ellis also questioned the relevance of Manafort's work as a political consultant for Russian-backed politicians in Ukraine, for which he was paid tens of millions of dollars from 2010 to 2014. But if Manafort didn't disclose some payments because he was not registered in the United States as a foreign agent, it would provide a motive to hide the amounts from the U.S. government just what the trial was about. Ellis chided prosecutors for eliciting testimony about Manafort's lavish lifestyle, but that kind of testimony is also a classic element in a tax-evasion case. That your cars, boats, condos and clothing suggest you made much more income than you reported would surely be relevant.
<snip>
What will be the impact of Ellis's anti-government bias, which was not nonverbal and hardly subtle? Hard to tell. We know next to nothing about this jury. Seeking to expedite matters, Ellis impaneled the Manafort jury in a single day.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)likely to get light sentences. Reason for guidelines is to provide data based material to avoid disparities in sentencing.
VOX
(22,976 posts)And in the meantime, POC are randomly executed on the spot by zealous LEOs, without benefit of judge or jury.
And the economic bifurcation of America continues.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)they must refer to themselves instead as 'government'. ['gummint'].
VOX
(22,976 posts)And of course, in their inversion of reality, they believe that 45 has been sent to them by their deity, to put down the radical socialists of the Democrat (sic) Party.
Poiuyt
(18,130 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,430 posts)uponit7771
(90,364 posts)moondust
(20,006 posts)The main reason Trump hired Manafort (without pay) instead of somebody else was likely because he was close to the cabal of a wealthy Kremlin kleptocrat believed to be responsible for the deaths of opponents and journalists, a kleptocrat whose approval and assistance Trump desperately wanted. And Decades before he ran the Trump campaign, Paul Manaforts pursuit of foreign cash and shady deals laid the groundwork for the corruption of Washington. And that's what Judge Ellis considers an "otherwise blameless life"? Wow.
Ellis' "anti-big government" bias sounds a whole lot like a Reagan political disciple who never grew up and probably never belonged on the bench.