Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Beringia

(4,316 posts)
Wed Mar 13, 2019, 07:11 PM Mar 2019

Undercover investigation finds Beagles suffering in lab experiments

UPDATE
https://www.facebook.com/michiganhumane/photos/a.116049627848/10156246926102849/?type=3&theater

4/9/2019

UPDATE FROM Michigan Humane Society:

We are happy to announce that the beagles from the study are now in our care. The process of evaluating each one of them to determine the optimal placement option will likely take several weeks. A timeframe for when these beagles will be available for adoption and details regarding adoption applications will be announced via our social channels. Our focus right now is on working toward positive re-homing opportunities for each of the animals.










3/12/2019

https://www.humanesociety.org/news/undercover-investigation-finds-dogs-suffering-lab-experiments

Some have already been put down; the Humane Society of the United States hopes to help the others
By M. Carrie Allan

In the heartrending video—taken by an HSUS undercover investigator at a large Michigan research facility conducting experiments for different drugs, medical procedures and products—dogs cower in their cages, the cumbersome drug pumps inserted under their skin clearly visible, like weird boxy growths. Others lie limply, woozy from drugs, their skin ripe with sutured wounds where researchers inserted various substances. Animals in other experiments—dogs whose teeth were pulled and jaws were surgically broken to test a dental implant—didn’t make it onto the video.

Even amidst all this, the undercover video shows many of the dogs wagging their tails and offering their tummies for rubs, still displaying their natural sweetness, still trusting the humans who visit their cages will offer kindness.

Working in the laboratory is a grim prospect for an animal lover. Dogs housed alone in single cages get taken for exercise once a week, but those who have a double cage to themselves don’t get even that much time outside of it. As a technician overseeing the animals’ care, “you show up in the morning, you check your schedule on your email, and then there are certain things that always have to be done,” including checks to make sure no animals have died overnight, says the investigator (whose name has been withheld to protect his or her undercover work).

The lab technicians responsible for the dogs have to work through strange contradictions. “It’s a really weird kind of dynamic … I've seen every technician at certain points just play with a dog or cuddle with the dog,” the investigator says. “They kind of encourage that, for you to have good interactions with the animals, because that does help. But then at the same time, you carry them to necropsy the next day.”

Beagles used in the Dow AgroSciences pesticide toxicity test are kept in stainless steel cages that severely limit their opportunities for comfort. This is their life for an entire year while they are force-fed pesticide up to four times daily.

One test being conducted was a pesticide study, in which dogs are fed different doses of the product to test its toxicity. It’s a test that is not even legally required in the United States and has been eliminated as a requirement virtually everywhere in the world. U.S. law requires a 90-day test on dogs to get a new pesticide approved, but the dogs in the laboratory we investigated were being subjected to an entire year of experimentation under the auspices of Dow AgroSciences. The study is scheduled to end in July, so the dogs are still alive at the time this story posted.

Dow itself has published papers arguing that the one-year pesticide test on dogs is unnecessary, and it has cooperated with Humane Society International in having the test removed from pesticide regulations globally, so it was startling to see the one-year test still being conducted on the company’s behalf. In November, the HSUS sent a letter to the company, alerting them to the test and asking for clarification on their reasons for conducting it, when they don’t need it to register a pesticide domestically. The HSUS concluded the letter by asking Dow to release the remaining dogs, so they have a chance to spend the rest of their lives in loving homes.

Dow responded, claiming it needed to conduct the test on dogs to comply with regulations in Brazil, which plans to formally end this test requirement later this year. In the meantime, Humane Society International secured a formal email communication from Brazilian officials stating that the one-year test is no longer required. Dow asked if HSUS and HSI would be willing to send a joint request to Brazil to secure a formal written letter to address their concerns, which the organizations quickly obtained and shared with Dow.

Unfortunately, the company still claims it needs further assurances before it releases the dogs. With dialogue at an impasse, the HSUS and HSI are now seeking help from supporters in pushing the company in the right direction.

“It is clear that dogs aren’t necessary for the one-year pesticide test, and we expect Dow to immediately put a stop to this study,” says Kathleen Conlee, vice president of animal research issues for the HSUS. In other toxicity tests, such as for drugs, Conlee says the use of dogs is outdated. “We can do better, and we should be doing better. You can still get somewhere with a horse and buggy, but is that the best way anymore? We want to have the conversation and find out: What data do they need that would help them move away from these tests?” Conlee is confident there are means to get the needed information that don’t involve subjecting dogs to these procedures, such as analysis of historical data on existing products and other technologies.

Even as the HSUS animal research team pushes toward a big, long-term goal—getting nearly 67,000 dogs out of animal testing and research altogether—Conlee first wants to try to save the ones who we know are still alive in the laboratory. “Our hope is that Dow will agree to release these 36 dogs,” she says.



Take Action, Sign the Petition
https://secure.humanesociety.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=7598&s_src=web_inline_dowdogs_031219
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Undercover investigation finds Beagles suffering in lab experiments (Original Post) Beringia Mar 2019 OP
I would sentence these MFs to life in prison malaise Mar 2019 #1
So disgusting Johnny2X2X Mar 2019 #2
+1 Baitball Blogger Mar 2019 #3
Signed the petition and posted to Facebook friends MustLoveBeagles Mar 2019 #4
UPDATE, see original post Beringia Apr 2019 #5

malaise

(269,157 posts)
1. I would sentence these MFs to life in prison
Wed Mar 13, 2019, 07:17 PM
Mar 2019

Who are these monsters?
This needs to be seen - get thee to the greatest page

Johnny2X2X

(19,108 posts)
2. So disgusting
Wed Mar 13, 2019, 07:21 PM
Mar 2019

And this isn't to cure cancer or some other horrible disease, this is so Dow can sell their poison in a new market.

The lab workers need to be doxed, they have no souls. Evil.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Undercover investigation ...