General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Velveteen Ocelot
(115,734 posts)unless matters of national security or trade secrets are being discussed. If only "faith-based" media are invited it's not going to be confidential information. This is the federal open meetings law: https://law.justia.com/codes/us/2012/title-5/part-i/chapter-5/subchapter-ii/section-552b/ Somebody needs to make a FOIA request, at least. There is also the issue of whether the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment applies.
safeinOhio
(32,688 posts)Some day the other side can do the same.
Baitball Blogger
(46,736 posts)They just used a religious purity test for a public venue.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I would think this is a straight up First Amendment issue...
Delphinus
(11,831 posts)dlk
(11,569 posts)We have to find a way to vote these extremist religious zealots out of office. They are destroying our democracy from within.
Initech
(100,080 posts)OMGWTF
(3,959 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts)malchickiwick
(1,474 posts)maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)the info will be released a few month's hence, but no one will care enough to get upset by the reporting at that point.
in other words, move along, libtard.
outrage fatigue.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Arghhhhhhh! Someone just shoot me!
RANDYWILDMAN
(2,672 posts)where you hope and prey you get the truth, but the reality is your listening to a Trump appointee and it's all lies anyways.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Welcome to DU Randywildman!
RANDYWILDMAN
(2,672 posts)Thanks !
Been lurking since President Kerry was nearly elected.
Only been posting a while. Super Bummed after the 2016 election day hack on DU