Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,186 posts)
Mon Mar 25, 2019, 10:35 AM Mar 2019

Riddle me this.

If it's DOJ policy to not make public potentially disparaging information about people in the investigation that were not going to be charged, why was it appropriate to say Trump wouldn't be charged although that decision took into consideration evidence for and against obstruction?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Riddle me this. (Original Post) Nevilledog Mar 2019 OP
Presumably, public interest outweighed other considerations n/t Perrenial Voter Mar 2019 #1
Public interest demands the full report. Nevilledog Mar 2019 #2
I agree n/t Perrenial Voter Mar 2019 #3

Nevilledog

(51,186 posts)
2. Public interest demands the full report.
Mon Mar 25, 2019, 10:56 AM
Mar 2019

Public interest demands info about other crimes. It's either a policy or it's not.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Riddle me this.