General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsToday's Apple product announcments...
Apple TV +: A new video streaming service featuring original content from folks like Steven Spielburg, Jennifer Aniston, Reese Witherspoon, JJ Abrams, and Oprah Winfrey
Apple TV Channels: a cable channel delivery service allowing ala carte ordering of programming on demand without advertising
Apple Arcade: an online video game subscription service
Apple News +: a monthly subscription service with access to 300 magazines and selected newspapers
Apple Card: a credit card without card number or security code, using built-in security of your iPhone and Apple Pay
CincyDem
(6,385 posts)Hard to say how this will all land. Apple always has its share of high emotions on both side. On on side, whatever they announce will be overpriced for what it is. On the other side, whatever they announce will have a transformative impact on the market.
Time will tell but the initial street reaction is "yawn".
(IMHO, the sleeper on this list is the credit card. That's a business model that could generate a lot of cash. The other stuff...meh.)
brooklynite
(94,713 posts)The valuation of the new products is always baked in to the price a week or two before the rollout.
CincyDem
(6,385 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Always is not an accurate descriptor.
brooklynite
(94,713 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)or credit service could be a game changer.
Auggie
(31,184 posts)is an Apple internet service provider option.
----------------------------------------
Interesting new announcements from a marketing standpoint. Growth in hardware has slowed, so Apple is becoming a player in content.
from Apple is either an affordable phone or an expensive phone that lasts more than a couple years.
Auggie
(31,184 posts)Better than paying full price.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 isn't a bargain either: https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/samsung-galaxy-s10-news-and-rumors/
brooklynite
(94,713 posts)...or a branded service off Verizon or a major cable company, but the infrastructure to put in a national (or even major urban centers) ISP would be prohibitive.
ooky
(8,928 posts)What I really need is an alternative to my broadband provider. As long as I have to pay my cable provider for internet access I still can't really cut the cord.
jmowreader
(50,562 posts)I want a MacBook Pro with iPhone functionality built into the chassis. This way I can go online from anywhere without having to tether my iPhone to the computer. Field service engineers would buy these things as fast as they could make them.
Auggie
(31,184 posts)I'd take a tablet version too.
jmowreader
(50,562 posts)...but all that does is Internet connectivity. (Which is a mistake they made - if they allowed you to use a Bluetooth earpiece the iPad would become a phablet.)
Yavin4
(35,445 posts)Auggie
(31,184 posts)Yavin4
(35,445 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)I recently dropped Hulu for DC Universe (or whatever the fuck its called). Ill keep that until Ive completed the first season of Doom Patrol and then Ill drop it for Britbox, which Ill drop after a few months for whatever else I want. I cant imagine paying for all of them at once.
Auggie
(31,184 posts)though admittedly, Netflix constantly adds good stuff that keeps me around for months.
ooky
(8,928 posts)Once I've watched everything I want to watch on one streaming service I cancel and go to the next one. I've been on Prime for over a year now and still have lots of stuff left to watch.
Volaris
(10,274 posts)And anything that makes that mainstream, gets my attention, even if I'm not a fan of Apple.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Is that some useful channels will die, like the History Channel and others, or they will use wall to wall advertising to make enough money to survive.
What I would like cable companies to do is set up a base choice (which they now do), then allow people to pick whatever else they want ala carte (which they don't do). While this won't protect all the valuable but thinly watched channels, it would protect the good ones in that class, IMO.
Volaris
(10,274 posts)And if for say, 40 bucks a month I got all networks, plus 10 basic cables of my choosing, I'd be happy. I'd pay an extra percentage for add free for those, and 10 bucks a month for PBS and each premium (HBO) that I wanted.
If I wanted a basic outside of that 10, charge me an extra 10 bucks for it .
Because I'm tired of paying for Fox news and the golf channel, when I don't watch them because they're worthless to me.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)inhouse cable company that sets up the pipe (fiber optic and future technologies that can reach homes free of the cable companies), the cable companies will be forced to adapt or die, they are already bleeding subscribers as people find other options. So, I believe soon the cable companies will be forced to allow some form of extensive ala carte selection to survive.