does anyone else think that robert mueller would deliver a report where

[mopinko]

it was not organized in such a way as to be presented to the congress w little or no fuss or muss?
jill banks just asked basically the same thing.
srsly. probably subheaded- send this part to congress, keep this section secret, ask the judge to release this section.

let's get real here. if it was good, he would have tweeted it by now.


and yeah, #rachels15questions

[Igel]

1. The report is fairly specific in description.

I assume he followed the regulations as to what it needed--which was basically why/why not for indictments, with the legal reasoning behind it.

I assume he grouped them for convenience of facts, context, and legal reasoning into different categories. But since the required communicative goal wasn't "by security clearance, by relatedness to other on-going investigations or proceedings, those covered by grand jury evidence rules or other rules of evidence" I doubt he had two entirely different reports written.

We know what one motivation was. We attribute the other motivation, and in so doing fall into the conservative "the deep state is trying to unseat Trump" narrative.

[mopinko]

2. and i am sure he wrote some summaries that are readily

revealed at the very least to the congress.

[mopinko]

6. so, do you admit you were wrong now?

watching rachel.
just like i said. they would never hand in a report that wasnt ready to be made public w little fuss. it was all laid out, ready to go.

[democratisphere]

3. The Mueller Report has and will likely be "edited" by Barr and the WH.

[bluestarone]

4. Wonder if BARR knows how many copies Mueller actually has?

[mopinko]

5. good question. i wouldnt be surprised.

but that doesnt mean he couldnt have a couple tucked away somewhere.