If Trump "Obstructed the Investigation"...as is somewhat indicated...then...
Last edited Thu Apr 4, 2019, 12:01 AM - Edit history (1)
That is clearly against the law, even if he did not "Collude with Russia." Obstructing an investigation is
..illegal.. Is that correct? So maybe not enough proof to prove "collusion" but maybe enough to prove.. "obstruction of an investigation"...
..Would Trump try to obstruct?.. Does he golf? Does he watch Fox News?...It ain't over till it is over..
Of course, This could be wrong.. all wrong. But I don't think it is over..I say that because the bottom line to me is that Trump is a crook, thinks like a crook, lies like a crook and will be caught by a crook catcher. As stated earlier, it may not be in our time frame..but the crook catcher will catch the crook.
If findings more troubling than indicated....?? What does that mean?...You think it means nothing?..Those of us who watched Watergate, knew Nixon was a crook. So, you think Trump is any better? Or worse? Or the same?
It took much longer than anyone thought for all the info on Watergate to come out. Much longer. But it did, and will come out again. That is the nature of the beast. So it takes another 6 months for all the crap to come out. You think it won't come out? Maybe these early reports are just...early reports......So, I think Trump is a crook, and Mueller will catch the crook. As Sgt Schultz said, and I say too.. I don't know nothing.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!
