Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

SHRED

(28,136 posts) Tue Apr 9, 2019, 11:24 AM Apr 2019

Barr called Mueller's choices "binary"

Link to tweet

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Barr called Mueller's choices "binary" (Original Post) SHRED Apr 2019 OP

Congress will get the Mueller Report one way or the other. democratisphere Apr 2019 #1

I don't want to hear from him. He is just trying to muddy the waters on the report. It's notdarkyet Apr 2019 #2

Barr said this week. True Blue American Apr 2019 #3

"that is for congress to decide"? not exactly. congress can't prosecute. unblock Apr 2019 #4

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)

1. Congress will get the Mueller Report one way or the other.

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Tue Apr 9, 2019, 11:27 AM

Apr 2019

notdarkyet

(2,226 posts)

2. I don't want to hear from him. He is just trying to muddy the waters on the report. It's

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Tue Apr 9, 2019, 11:28 AM

Apr 2019

Disgusting what he is doing. Ugly creep physicallly and mentally.

True Blue American

(17,986 posts)

3. Barr said this week.

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Tue Apr 9, 2019, 11:42 AM

Apr 2019

He also said there would be explanations for redactions.

Barr is having a time explaining what he would do if the Judges rule against the ACA. Said he did not believe they would just cut it off.

Getting a lot of purging here while listening. Church Drive and Boy Scouts garage sale.

unblock

(52,253 posts)

4. "that is for congress to decide"? not exactly. congress can't prosecute.

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Tue Apr 9, 2019, 12:03 PM

Apr 2019

congress might be able to impeach and remove, and at that point (or whenever he's no longer president), the doj might prosecute.

but "that", referring to charging a sitting president, is not for congress to decide.

that was for the doj to decide, and barr apparently chose to follow a constitutionally invalid, corrupt "rule" that grants a temporary tyranny to a sitting president.

Reply to this discussion