Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Belt-tightening time (Original Post) ErikJ Aug 2012 OP
That's about right. southernyankeebelle Aug 2012 #1
But...but...it'll trickle down... MercutioATC Aug 2012 #2
We only deserve crumbs (at least that is what they would say). southernyankeebelle Aug 2012 #3
Don't get me wrong. The wealthy ARE historically the people who create jobs...and still are. MercutioATC Aug 2012 #6
All I want to know whatever happened to Corporate Morales and doing the right thing for country and southernyankeebelle Aug 2012 #7
A corporation's duty is to its shareholders. Period. MercutioATC Aug 2012 #8
Shareholders are the people and they should demand better. southernyankeebelle Aug 2012 #9
If they do, that's fine. MercutioATC Aug 2012 #10
K&R Mnemosyne Aug 2012 #4
LOVE it! JaneyVee Aug 2012 #5
 

MercutioATC

(28,470 posts)
6. Don't get me wrong. The wealthy ARE historically the people who create jobs...and still are.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 08:37 PM
Aug 2012

As such, freeing up their capital to create jobs DOES help employment. That said, creating overseas jobs is much more lucrative than creating jobs in the U.S.

I'm completely in favor of throwing money at the wealthy to create jobs...as long as it's means-tested. No over-the-counter tax breaks. Give them (or their corporations) tax breaks in the form of deductions for every domestic job created, and tie the deductions to salaries so they don't just create a bunch of part-time minimum-wage jobs.

While we're at it, require all banks getting money at the discount window at 0%-.5% to use a certain percent of that money to fund small business loans.

Our current system has the wealthy getting tax breaks to move money overseas and gives banks free money that they then use to buy treasuries for a risk-free payoff from the government.

I don't have a problem giving them the money, but we need to actually require that they do something in return.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
7. All I want to know whatever happened to Corporate Morales and doing the right thing for country and
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 10:07 PM
Aug 2012

it's citizens? Capitalism should help everyone, not just the rich. Everyone deserves a living wage to feed their families.

 

MercutioATC

(28,470 posts)
8. A corporation's duty is to its shareholders. Period.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 10:12 PM
Aug 2012

I don't fault the corporations, I fault the bought-and-paid-for legislators that let them write laws that don't require them to perform in exchange for tax breaks.

 

MercutioATC

(28,470 posts)
10. If they do, that's fine.
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 11:01 AM
Aug 2012

Most shareholders want maximized profits. A corporation's first duty is to abide by its shareholders wishes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Belt-tightening time