General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumssouthernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)MercutioATC
(28,470 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)MercutioATC
(28,470 posts)As such, freeing up their capital to create jobs DOES help employment. That said, creating overseas jobs is much more lucrative than creating jobs in the U.S.
I'm completely in favor of throwing money at the wealthy to create jobs...as long as it's means-tested. No over-the-counter tax breaks. Give them (or their corporations) tax breaks in the form of deductions for every domestic job created, and tie the deductions to salaries so they don't just create a bunch of part-time minimum-wage jobs.
While we're at it, require all banks getting money at the discount window at 0%-.5% to use a certain percent of that money to fund small business loans.
Our current system has the wealthy getting tax breaks to move money overseas and gives banks free money that they then use to buy treasuries for a risk-free payoff from the government.
I don't have a problem giving them the money, but we need to actually require that they do something in return.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)it's citizens? Capitalism should help everyone, not just the rich. Everyone deserves a living wage to feed their families.
MercutioATC
(28,470 posts)I don't fault the corporations, I fault the bought-and-paid-for legislators that let them write laws that don't require them to perform in exchange for tax breaks.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)MercutioATC
(28,470 posts)Most shareholders want maximized profits. A corporation's first duty is to abide by its shareholders wishes.