General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThings to Watch For in the Redacted Mueller Report
WASHINGTON The redacted version of the Mueller report due to be released Thursday will offer the fullest (but still incomplete) view yet of how the special counsels office ran its investigation and what it uncovered. Attorney General William Barrs March 24th letter purported to provide the principal conclusions of Muellers probe namely, that there was no criminal conspiracy or coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign, and that Mueller chose not to make a determination about whether to prosecute President Trump for obstruction of justice, while underscoring that the investigation does not exonerate the president. Barr quickly concluded that, in his view, there wasnt sufficient evidence to bring an obstruction charge. Trump tweeted that his attorney generals letter amounted to total EXONERATION.
But Barr quoted fewer than 100 words of what is reportedly a nearly 400-page report. We know from court filings and reporting on Muellers investigation that there were myriad events, money trails and persons of interest that came under his teams scrutiny. Those details didnt make it into Barrs letter, but they could appear in the redacted report and so tell us more about Trump Worlds contacts (witting or otherwise) with Russia or its intermediaries, WikiLeaks role in the election, and what interest, if any, Mueller took in Trumps family.
Here are seven things to watch for when reading the report.
What Trump told Mueller
The special counsels office never secured a face-to-face interview with Trump. Despite extensive negotiations, the most they got out of the president were written answers to a list of questions submitted by Mueller. What were those questions? How did Trump and his lawyers respond? Did any of Trumps answers contradict evidence gathered by Mueller?
Paul Manafort and the heart of the investigation
In the final weeks of the probe, one of Muellers senior lawyers, Andrew Weissmann, appeared in court for a sealed hearing to discuss one avenue of investigation: an August 2016 meeting in New York between Manafort, the Republican super-consultant who briefly served as Trumps campaign chairman, and a Russian business partner named Konstantin Kilimnik. At that meeting, Manafort supposedly exchanged internal campaign polling data with Kilimnik and the two men discussed a peace plan concerning Russia and Ukraines conflict over control of the Crimea. Weissmann told the judge that that meeting goes, I think, very much to the heart of what the Special Counsels Office is investigating.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/7-things-to-watch-for-in-the-partial-mueller-report-823383/
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)Since there are only two footnotes in the letter and this is the only substantive footnote, one can assume Barr thinks the legal definition of "coordination" used is significant. He is right.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/16/opinions/mueller-report-legal-definition-coordination-noble/index.html