GRRR. Right off the bat, some male reporter interrupted a female reporter as she was trying

[pnwmom]

to re-ask the question Barr had just ignored (the 2nd part of her 2 part question) -- about what he and Mueller disagreed on. And Barr immediately answered the guy instead of finishing his answer to the woman.

The interruptor thus let Barr off the hook, and no one else ever asked that question.

[BumRushDaShow]

1. The first question

seems to be touching on that....

[BSdetect]

2. Unless we can get Mueller to testify and bring the full report to Congress there is little hope left

[still_one]

4. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

[uponit7771]

5. +1

[Johnny2X2X]

3. The report will show collusion

They wouldn't be out here screaming No Collusion over and over unless the report that's about to get released shows definitive collusion that all will agree is collusion.

[Wounded Bear]

9. The collusion happened in plain sight...

all of us saw it.

[Tipperary]

6. I saw that. I did not miss Barr rolling his eyes either.

What a snake he is.

[OnDoutside]

7. I thought the question asked should have started with

"Mueller's spokesman, Peter Carr, pointedly issued a statement saying that Mueller would not attend your press conference. Did you invite him to attend ?". She should have stuck to simple questions, almost yes/no types.

[pnwmom]

8. It's normal to be allowed a two-part question and that male reporter should NOT have interrupted.

Why should she have stuck to a simple "almost yes/no" question? That's not usual in a press conference. And she wouldn't have known that the guy would have jumped in and stopped her.