Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere doesn't have to be an underlying crime to commit obstruction
of justice. (I thought I heard some other people say the exact opposite but maybe they were referring to something else?)
Mueller: There doesn't need to be an underlying crime for there to be obstruction of justice. "The injury to the integrity of the justice system is the same regardless of whether a person committed an underlying wrong."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 500 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There doesn't have to be an underlying crime to commit obstruction (Original Post)
Maraya1969
Apr 2019
OP
K&R, ... and it looks like *ATTEMPTED* obstruction of justice is against the law too.
uponit7771
Apr 2019
#1
+1, looks like we need to pressure dem pols and presidential candidates about addressing
uponit7771
Apr 2019
#3
uponit7771
(90,346 posts)1. K&R, ... and it looks like *ATTEMPTED* obstruction of justice is against the law too.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)2. Oh it is and if ANY democrat did it they would be in prison already
uponit7771
(90,346 posts)3. +1, looks like we need to pressure dem pols and presidential candidates about addressing
... this.
RegexReader
(416 posts)4. calling names is childish but not criminal
he turned over all documents requested
he made his staff available for interviews
think it was Comey he asked to have his staff investigated for collusion.
then we have
Link to tweet
Why didn't Mueller have her interviewed for what she knew?
Maraya1969
(22,482 posts)5. How do you know he didn't? And are you trying to suggest #45
didn't try and obstruct justice? Especially when it is written right there in Mueller's report?