Every redaction pictured here.

[Cattledog]

[Hoyt]

1. That's not a lot, actually. Listening to MSNBC there is a lot of unredacted damaging stuff.

[TwilightZone]

2. That's not even remotely close to the "half" that many are claiming.

Those claims were apparently made with zero knowledge of the report.

[Luciferous]

3. That doesn't look that bad.

[trueblue2007]

4. May not be much redaction to some .... I think it's awful. ROTTEN !!

[FakeNoose]

5. In Part 2 the redactions seem to be about Roger Stone

I haven't read the whole report (obviously) but the pages I've seen so far seem to have redactions where there's info about Roger Stone. Well Stone is still under litigation, and they can't reveal stuff that will be used in his trial. I see that Wikileaks keeps cropping up, and then a redaction where they blacked out Stone's name or something he said or did. (This is a guess on my part.)

Part 2 mainly deals with obstruction and what happened after Chump "won" the election. There's juicier stuff in Part 1, because it's what happened during the campaign, but there's also a lot more black-out sections.

[lostnfound]

6. Thank you for posting this

The important question at the moment is whether leaders in congress see the whole thing.
And hat they get Mueller to testify.