Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRubin: Five questions that still need to be answered in the Mueller report
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/04/18/five-questions-that-still-need-be-answered-mueller-report/In the coming days and weeks, reporters and legal analysts will comprehensively analyze Robert S. Muller IIIs report laying out in excruciating detail Russias attempt to interfere with our election, President Trumps teams willingness to benefit from such interference and even obtain Hillary Clintons purloined emails, and Trumps systematic, continual efforts to thwart the investigation. For now, lets look at five topics that will require further clarification from Attorney General William P. Barr, Mueller and some of the figures involved.
First, the degree to which Barr and other members of the Trump administration, including press secretary Sarah Sanders, actively and thoroughly misled or even outright lied to the public is jaw-dropping. In spinning the report, Barr has shown himself not only to be acting as defense counsel to Trump but also to be in violation of his professional ethics as a lawyer. ...
-snip-
Second, the idea that Mueller found there was no collusion has been debunked. Collusion, as we have pointed out numerous times, is not a legal term, and Mueller reiterated that very point, declining to render a judgment on collusion. What he looked at was whether there was sufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy. That, however, leaves a wide range of conduct that included encouraging hacking of Hillary Clintons emails (which Russians did hours after Trump publicly suggested they do so); echoing Russian denials that they were interfering with the investigation; and Paul Manaforts meeting with Konstantin Kilimnik in which Trumps Midwestern campaign strategy was discussed (!). In sum, Mueller found the Trump team expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, and when, for example, WikiLeaks did just that, Trump went back to the WikiLeaks email dumps again and again.
Third, there is replete evidence of obstruction of justice. Mueller makes clear that he was not going to render a decision on criminality because Justice Department guidelines prevented him from doing so. However, both in his analysis and in his compilation of facts, he provides Congress with at least as much evidence for obstruction as existed against President Richard M. Nixon.
-snip-
Mueller specifically rejected the theory Barr laid out in his audition memo last year that Trumps actions within his Article II powers could not be considered obstruction of justice.
Fourth, the mainstream medias report on the incidents that Mueller examined with regard to obstruction were, in virtually all cases, completely correct. The White Houses denials were bogus and right-wing cheerleaders who claimed the media got it wrong were themselves wrong. Trump did try to fire Mueller; he did mislead the public regarding the Trump Tower meeting; and he did try to influence witnesses.
Finally, there is much more to come. Muellers investigation referred 14 investigations to outside prosecution, 12 of which were redacted in the report. ...
-snip-
One can question whether Trump should be prosecuted and whether it would be wise to impeach him, knowing the Republican Senate will never remove him. What is unarguable is that no person who has behaved in ways Mueller described including repeated lies to voters and efforts to impair an investigation should be reelected. Republicans who insist otherwise once more disgrace themselves.
First, the degree to which Barr and other members of the Trump administration, including press secretary Sarah Sanders, actively and thoroughly misled or even outright lied to the public is jaw-dropping. In spinning the report, Barr has shown himself not only to be acting as defense counsel to Trump but also to be in violation of his professional ethics as a lawyer. ...
-snip-
Second, the idea that Mueller found there was no collusion has been debunked. Collusion, as we have pointed out numerous times, is not a legal term, and Mueller reiterated that very point, declining to render a judgment on collusion. What he looked at was whether there was sufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy. That, however, leaves a wide range of conduct that included encouraging hacking of Hillary Clintons emails (which Russians did hours after Trump publicly suggested they do so); echoing Russian denials that they were interfering with the investigation; and Paul Manaforts meeting with Konstantin Kilimnik in which Trumps Midwestern campaign strategy was discussed (!). In sum, Mueller found the Trump team expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, and when, for example, WikiLeaks did just that, Trump went back to the WikiLeaks email dumps again and again.
Third, there is replete evidence of obstruction of justice. Mueller makes clear that he was not going to render a decision on criminality because Justice Department guidelines prevented him from doing so. However, both in his analysis and in his compilation of facts, he provides Congress with at least as much evidence for obstruction as existed against President Richard M. Nixon.
-snip-
Mueller specifically rejected the theory Barr laid out in his audition memo last year that Trumps actions within his Article II powers could not be considered obstruction of justice.
Fourth, the mainstream medias report on the incidents that Mueller examined with regard to obstruction were, in virtually all cases, completely correct. The White Houses denials were bogus and right-wing cheerleaders who claimed the media got it wrong were themselves wrong. Trump did try to fire Mueller; he did mislead the public regarding the Trump Tower meeting; and he did try to influence witnesses.
Finally, there is much more to come. Muellers investigation referred 14 investigations to outside prosecution, 12 of which were redacted in the report. ...
-snip-
One can question whether Trump should be prosecuted and whether it would be wise to impeach him, knowing the Republican Senate will never remove him. What is unarguable is that no person who has behaved in ways Mueller described including repeated lies to voters and efforts to impair an investigation should be reelected. Republicans who insist otherwise once more disgrace themselves.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 457 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post