General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsImpeachment is for UNACCEPTABLE WRONGDOING by a President - NOT limited to technical crimes.
It's up to Congress to fully expose the wrongdoing - with impeachment investigations, proceedings - perhaps an impeachment trial...
And ultimately up to the public as to whether these fully exposed wrongdoings are deemed acceptable.
Presidential abuses of power are not usually crimes technically - but are considered "high crimes and misdemeanors" as referred to in the Impeachment Clause.
We never needed Mueller to find crimes - (though he obviously feels he found them as far as obstruction of justice).
Nothing Nixon did unto itself would constitute a specific technical crime.
NeoGreen
(4,031 posts)ElementaryPenguin
(7,800 posts)rampartc
(5,407 posts)seem to be "technical crimes" to many people.
pres clinton was guilty of "perjury." certainly a crime.
nixon was not impeached, but the watergate operation was technically a "second rate burglary," with nixon as a conspirator.
i think we need to name a crime. maybe "fraud" on the trump university or or one of his condo scams? it doesn't matter. his supporters would not recognize "murder" as serious enough, so we need to find a clear cut crime.
ElementaryPenguin
(7,800 posts)for committing a felony in violating Campaign Financing law. Trump, of course, was named as a co-conspirator. There's one crime he's already been accused of. So that one will do for a start. We have physical evidence - he signed 8 checks.
We can't worry about his hardcore supporters - they are Nazi lunatic fringe. (albeit a rather large "fringe"
rampartc
(5,407 posts)i think that is a great place to start.