Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 02:25 PM Apr 2019

I'm not convinced that it was necessary to give Matt Gaetz a forum on MSNBC just now.

Chris Jansing. filling in for Katy Tur.

And yeah, she is trying to argue his talking points, but she's doing that by letting him MAKE all of his talking points.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm not convinced that it was necessary to give Matt Gaetz a forum on MSNBC just now. (Original Post) Miles Archer Apr 2019 OP
I'm convinced that reading the news is better than watching it. Iggo Apr 2019 #1
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm malaise Apr 2019 #2
that was vomitous EveHammond13 Apr 2019 #3
frightening how shameless and determined the right is to outright lie and lie and lie EveHammond13 Apr 2019 #4
They are doing nothing more than what they've always done. lunatica Apr 2019 #8
They know from experience that there are no penalties for lying FiveGoodMen Apr 2019 #12
Funny, I just posted about this too. liberalnarb Apr 2019 #5
Yeah, "Thank GOD he didn't testify under oath" was another gem Miles Archer Apr 2019 #9
*Barf* liberalnarb Apr 2019 #10
Chris Jansing? Polly Hennessey Apr 2019 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author Polly Hennessey Apr 2019 #7
They are spinning their heads off. vsrazdem Apr 2019 #11
When they have a slick lawyer type like Gaetz Instant Liberal Apr 2019 #13

Iggo

(47,558 posts)
1. I'm convinced that reading the news is better than watching it.
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 02:28 PM
Apr 2019


(Sorry. I'm being a contrarian smartass this morning.)

malaise

(269,022 posts)
2. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 02:29 PM
Apr 2019

You have to earn all those great trips - like the one to Notre Dame - good hacks earn trips

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
8. They are doing nothing more than what they've always done.
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 02:35 PM
Apr 2019

We’re the ones who have changed. We’re seeing the lies as lies.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
12. They know from experience that there are no penalties for lying
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 03:20 PM
Apr 2019

And they don't have any sort of conscience or they would never be in that party to begin with.

 

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts)
5. Funny, I just posted about this too.
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 02:31 PM
Apr 2019

That was infuriating. I hit the floor when he claimed Rump acts with "unprecedented transparency".

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
9. Yeah, "Thank GOD he didn't testify under oath" was another gem
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 02:35 PM
Apr 2019

He wasn't there to "discuss" anything.

And if we consider MSNBC personalities like Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O'Donnell and Joy Reid to be in the "top tier" of what the network has to offer, I've always felt that Chris is more of an Alex Witt (MSNBC weekends) type of interviewer. Both bring on the right wing loons, let them vent, put on a game face as they try to present the "other side," and it always ends up as a forum for wingnut talking points and nothing more.

Response to Miles Archer (Original post)

Instant Liberal

(66 posts)
13. When they have a slick lawyer type like Gaetz
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 03:52 PM
Apr 2019

They need to have someone equally fluent in bullshit, or at least in pointing it out and countering it. Notice those guys NEVER go on Rachel or Lawrence. It's usually a fill in or someone inexperienced in Combative Debate. Gaetz knew his talking points and stuck to them. She thought she had the report on her side but failed to cite the direct counters to his argument.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm not convinced that it...