General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm not convinced that it was necessary to give Matt Gaetz a forum on MSNBC just now.
Chris Jansing. filling in for Katy Tur.
And yeah, she is trying to argue his talking points, but she's doing that by letting him MAKE all of his talking points.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)(Sorry. I'm being a contrarian smartass this morning.)
malaise
(269,022 posts)You have to earn all those great trips - like the one to Notre Dame - good hacks earn trips
EveHammond13
(2,855 posts)EveHammond13
(2,855 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)Were the ones who have changed. Were seeing the lies as lies.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)And they don't have any sort of conscience or they would never be in that party to begin with.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)That was infuriating. I hit the floor when he claimed Rump acts with "unprecedented transparency".
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)He wasn't there to "discuss" anything.
And if we consider MSNBC personalities like Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O'Donnell and Joy Reid to be in the "top tier" of what the network has to offer, I've always felt that Chris is more of an Alex Witt (MSNBC weekends) type of interviewer. Both bring on the right wing loons, let them vent, put on a game face as they try to present the "other side," and it always ends up as a forum for wingnut talking points and nothing more.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Polly Hennessey
(6,798 posts)Not worth your time. But now you probably know that.
Response to Miles Archer (Original post)
Polly Hennessey This message was self-deleted by its author.
vsrazdem
(2,177 posts)Instant Liberal
(66 posts)They need to have someone equally fluent in bullshit, or at least in pointing it out and countering it. Notice those guys NEVER go on Rachel or Lawrence. It's usually a fill in or someone inexperienced in Combative Debate. Gaetz knew his talking points and stuck to them. She thought she had the report on her side but failed to cite the direct counters to his argument.