General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI do like Neal Katyal. Very smart and lays out his points neatly and understandable. n/t
hlthe2b
(102,294 posts)dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)empedocles
(15,751 posts)Mueller's statement that Mueller could not indict trump, no matter how criminal the evidence is, works against trump. That is, criminal evidence must be dealt with. It will be dealt with by impeachment.
I am drawn to lawyer-talk; it's in the family!
empedocles
(15,751 posts)used and hogtied by that flawed OLC opinion.
elleng
(130,974 posts)Again:
'The terms tactic and strategy are often confused: tactics are the actual means used to gain an objective, while strategy is the overall campaign plan, which may involve complex operational patterns, activity, and decision-making that govern tactical execution.'
empedocles
(15,751 posts)that some on DU hope that when Mueller appears before Congress, he can be pressured to take a more aggressive posture against trump. My guess, is that Mueller might well not do that.
However, he may be somewhat more likely, and better positioned to, do something more 'strategically' important. That is, under questioning, judiciously explain the barr v. Mueller problems. That could judiciously cut the legal and political legs out from barr - whose reach and range would be limited, [remotely similar to a Monty Python character villain]. This is all my own opinion here.
However, I think someone on DU quoted Seth Abramson as citing the great importance of barr to trump.
elleng
(130,974 posts)and his doing so will provide fodder for Dems to ACT.
He won't, imo, take an aggressive posture against anyone, but FACTS!
Rhiannon12866
(205,535 posts)Neal Katyal, the man who wrote the rule on special counsel investigations, wants to point everyone's attention to footnote #1,091 of the Mueller report.