General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNotes on the Mueller Report: A Reading Diary
LawfareThe following table of contents are links to the sections of this journal, which correspond to sections of the report itself:
This is a short little section, barely two pages, but it has several interesting items in it, starting with Muellers almost casual endorsement of the FBIs historical account of the Russia investigations origins. In the middle of page 1, Mueller describes the investigation as beginning when a foreign government contacted the FBI about a May 2016 encounter with Trump Campaign foreign policy advisor George Papadopoulos. Papadopoulos, Mueller writes, had suggested to a representative of that foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information damaging to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. It was that information, the paragraph concludes, that prompted the FBI on July 31, 2016, to open an investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.
Sorry, Devin Nunes. There's no mention of the Steele Dossier.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)better
(884 posts)Two of the people contacted by Flynn were Barbara Ledeen and Peter Smith. Ledeen had been working on recovering the emails for a while already, Mueller reports. Smith, only weeks after Trumps speech, sprang into action himself on the subject. The result was the operation about which Matt Tait wrote a firsthand account on Lawfare. The investigation established that Smith communicated with at least [campaign officials] Flynn and [Sam] Clovis about his search for the deleted Clinton emails, Mueller writes, though the Office did not identify evidence that any of the listed individuals initiated or directed Smiths efforts. Ledeen obtained emails that proved to be not authentic. Smith, for his part, drafted multiple emails stating or intimating that he was in contact with Russian hackersthough Mueller notes that the investigation did not establish that Smith was in contact with Russian hackers or that Smith, Ledeen, or other individuals in touch with the Trump Campaign ultimately obtained the deleted Clinton emails.
In other words, it wasnt that Trump was above dealing with Russian hackers to get Hillary Clintons emails. He not only called publicly on the Russians to deliver the goods on his opponent, but he also privately ordered his campaign to seek the material out. He did this knowing himselfclear from his public statements and very clear from the actions of those who acted on his requestthat Russia would or might be the source.
The reason theres no foul here is only that the whole thing was a wild conspiracy theory. The idea that the missing 30,000 emails had been retrieved was never more than conjecture, after all. The idea that they would be easily retrievable from the dark web was a kind of fantasy. In other words, even as a real hacking operation was going on, Trump personally, his campaign and his campaign followers were actively attempting to collude with a fake hacking operation that wasnt going on.
It is not illegal to imagine stolen emails and try to retrieve them from imagined hackers. But its morally little different from being spoon-fed information by Russian intelligence. The Trump campaign was seeking exactly the spoon-feeding it was accused of taking; it just couldnt manage to find the right spoon, and it kept missing when it tried to put any spoons in its mouth.