Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStarr Report Veteran Says Trump's Crimes Are 'Thousandfold' Worse: calls for impeachment inquiry
My view is that theres ample reason right now for the House Judiciary Committee to begin an impeachment inquiry.--Paul Rosenzweig, who served as a senior counsel to Ken Starr
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-bill-clinton-ken-starr-team-impeach_n_5cc36169e4b08e4e34820057
A member of the independent counsel team that recommended the impeachment of President Bill Clinton says that President Trumps attempts to obstruct justice are blunter by a thousandfold than anything Clinton did and more than justifies the House Judiciary Committee opening impeachment proceedings.
--snip--
My view is that theres ample reason right now for the House Judiciary Committee to begin an impeachment inquiry and if it were up to me, I would recommend them to impeach, said Rosenzweig. I mean, if I were called to testify today at the first of those hearings, I would say that Trumps obstruction of justice and frankly, more importantly, Trumps dereliction of duty in failing to address the issue of Russian interference in our electoral processes, are by themselves grounds for his impeachment.
Add to that, his recalcitrance in responding to [special counsel Robert] Mueller and his stonewalling of congressional investigations and the case becomes much more compelling than that which attended the [impeachment] recommendation with respect to Clinton, Rosenzweig added.
--snip--
The views of Rosenzweig and others on Starrs team could be a factor in the debate as House Democrats weigh whether to formally initiate an impeachment inquiry into the president. The Starr reports referral to Congress in September 1998 outlined 11 possible grounds for impeachment of Clinton growing out of his attempts to conceal his sexual affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Five of the recommended articles accused Clinton of attempting to obstruct justice; a sixth asserted that he failed to fulfill his constitutional duty to faithfully execute the laws by, among other actions, invoking groundless executive privilege claims to try and prevent some of his aides from testifying.
--snip--
My view is that theres ample reason right now for the House Judiciary Committee to begin an impeachment inquiry and if it were up to me, I would recommend them to impeach, said Rosenzweig. I mean, if I were called to testify today at the first of those hearings, I would say that Trumps obstruction of justice and frankly, more importantly, Trumps dereliction of duty in failing to address the issue of Russian interference in our electoral processes, are by themselves grounds for his impeachment.
Add to that, his recalcitrance in responding to [special counsel Robert] Mueller and his stonewalling of congressional investigations and the case becomes much more compelling than that which attended the [impeachment] recommendation with respect to Clinton, Rosenzweig added.
--snip--
The views of Rosenzweig and others on Starrs team could be a factor in the debate as House Democrats weigh whether to formally initiate an impeachment inquiry into the president. The Starr reports referral to Congress in September 1998 outlined 11 possible grounds for impeachment of Clinton growing out of his attempts to conceal his sexual affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Five of the recommended articles accused Clinton of attempting to obstruct justice; a sixth asserted that he failed to fulfill his constitutional duty to faithfully execute the laws by, among other actions, invoking groundless executive privilege claims to try and prevent some of his aides from testifying.
--more--
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 623 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Starr Report Veteran Says Trump's Crimes Are 'Thousandfold' Worse: calls for impeachment inquiry (Original Post)
hlthe2b
Apr 2019
OP
highplainsdem
(48,978 posts)1. K&R
FakeNoose
(32,639 posts)2. Why doesn't he admit they had no grounds to impeach Bill Clinton?
THAT would be the real news!