Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pro-Life? (Original Post) pokerfan Aug 2012 OP
true that. nt seabeyond Aug 2012 #1
K&R! smirkymonkey Aug 2012 #2
The G0Pee is pro-zygote. Jamaal510 Aug 2012 #3
I can't reccomend this one enough! LeftofObama Aug 2012 #4
Absolutely. n/t pnwmom Aug 2012 #5
Choice ? TatonkaJames Aug 2012 #6
Not Specifically Liberal oldsarge54 Aug 2012 #10
Nice post oldsarge54 and welcome to DU! bluesbassman Aug 2012 #11
I love you!! handmade34 Aug 2012 #15
+1000 (nt) pokerfan Aug 2012 #18
First post in a long time I've wished I could rec more than once. obxhead Aug 2012 #7
k&r... spanone Aug 2012 #8
GOP theory of the sanctity of life. hay rick Aug 2012 #9
Oh, I so hate the fact that "pro life" has now become part of the common vocabulary judy Aug 2012 #12
Good post pokerfan. To be perfectly blunt though, bluesbassman Aug 2012 #13
Fetuses, gay marriage, and guns. hay rick Aug 2012 #17
Fetus worshipers n2doc Aug 2012 #14
Just an egregious misnomer of the anti-abortion crowd. Nihilistic Aug 2012 #16

TatonkaJames

(530 posts)
6. Choice ?
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 07:02 PM
Aug 2012

If we're to believe those who want to lead this nation that all life is sacred but want to tell women what choices they have, what choice are they giving women who are pregnant in war zones when dropping bombs on them and killing both the mother and fetus ?
Seems like they're passing judgment that the child will be an enemy of the U.S ?
And yes, when it comes to starving children, if there's no profit in it, there's no need for a debate or remedy in some leaders minds.

oldsarge54

(582 posts)
10. Not Specifically Liberal
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 07:31 PM
Aug 2012

I'm not specifically liberal, I've just been pigeoned holed into being one. I am fighting for what American was or should have been. I did many relief flights to Africa to feed people. Yet now Republicans preach, keep the money at home while at the same time attack relief efforts at home. They talk a mean game about pro-life, but refuse to give money to PP, whose Federal money is spent on well baby and well mommy as well as Stds, and not one cent of Fed money on abortion. (Put my money where my mouth is, several decades of CFC and such like donations went specifically there). I'm not specifically liberal, but the scapegoating of illegals as the source of all troubles, and being prepared to change American law so that a latino has to prove citizenship or being assumed guilty, is not American. I'm not specifically a liberal, but when Republicans place industry above government (like fascists), fail to fund or allow appointments to posts in regulatory agencies, like the Labor Board or the Consumer Credit Protection Agency, when tort reform specifically limits the liability of businesses, and restricts the rights of the injured parties, how can one not avoid the label liberal? When the Tea Party purges Republican senior officials for reasons of ideological purity, a kinder, gentler version of the "Night of the Long Knives." how can one remain Conservative? Anti liberalism, a mythic past, traditional values, militarism, and above all hatred of gays, latinos, women on BC,all strike me that the Tea Party has taken the Republican party to fascism. I'm a liberal because I am a real conservative, I believe in America, not Corporate America.

bluesbassman

(19,379 posts)
11. Nice post oldsarge54 and welcome to DU!
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 07:40 PM
Aug 2012

According to what you've said here, you and I share a lot of common ground. I think you'll find a lot of other DUers to feel the same way.

 

obxhead

(8,434 posts)
7. First post in a long time I've wished I could rec more than once.
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 07:06 PM
Aug 2012

Excellent presentation of the root of the argument.

spanone

(135,877 posts)
8. k&r...
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 07:12 PM
Aug 2012

the rnc platform calls for no new taxes, except for wars....and children go to bed hungry in america

hay rick

(7,640 posts)
9. GOP theory of the sanctity of life.
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 07:22 PM
Aug 2012

The sanctity of life starts at the moment of conception and ends 9 months later.

judy

(1,942 posts)
12. Oh, I so hate the fact that "pro life" has now become part of the common vocabulary
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 07:40 PM
Aug 2012

This post makes it clear. Those who think that abortion should be outlawed are not pro-life, they are ANTI-CHOICE.

But the Republicans have been very good at twisting the English language.
Think about it:
You have "pro-life" on one side and on the other "pro-abortion". These are now commonly used in the media on all sides.
It is a horrible twist of the reality, designed to make the pro-life people seem like much better people than those who "like" abortion. This is of course what is suggested by these terms, not the reality.
No one "likes" abortion. Abortion is a very traumatic event for any woman...

Only two terms should be used in this case:
PRO-CHOICE, and ANTI-CHOICE.

Changing the discourse can skew reality and twist the minds.
Let's spread the word and push the media to use the correct terms. It might help put things in their proper place.

bluesbassman

(19,379 posts)
13. Good post pokerfan. To be perfectly blunt though,
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 07:45 PM
Aug 2012

I don't believe the GOP movers and shakers really care about the unborn either. It's merely a wedge issue that they've latched on to because it panders to their religous right base.

hay rick

(7,640 posts)
17. Fetuses, gay marriage, and guns.
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 08:38 PM
Aug 2012

The people who own the GOP probably look down their noses at the people that take "social issues" seriously. Those issues are just tools they use to buy votes cheap and promote politicians who will fatten their bottom line.

Nihilistic

(8 posts)
16. Just an egregious misnomer of the anti-abortion crowd.
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 08:23 PM
Aug 2012

I was just thinking about this "pro-life" misnomer today while watching Marco Rubio on television drone on seemingly endlessly. What struck me is what a farce that label is on the face of it--and it's still being used by the self-righteous anti-abortion crowd to this day. It's nothing but a sanctimonious attempt at hiding behind religious dogma and dodging the actual position. Just keep it honest and say what your actual position is on the issue--anti-abortion or anti-choice. I'd respect the use of the term more perhaps if such people were also pro-social security, pro-universal health care, anti-war, anti-capital punishment, anti-poverty, etc.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pro-Life?