Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGreat point from Asha Rangappa
I'll post a link to her tweet when I get the chance...
"Can someone ask Barr whether the fact that DOJ did not charge HRC means that she was "falsely accused" and therefore could have freely obstructed justice?"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 800 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Great point from Asha Rangappa (Original Post)
NewJeffCT
May 2019
OP
unblock
(52,317 posts)1. logically, that's a great argument. practically, asking it would only encourage them to indict her.
then again, they'll probably indict her anyway....
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)4. well, they currently have several investigations into Clinton
and her emails and Uranium One...
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)2. Here is her tweet
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)3. a bit more