General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt's over. Trump won
Last edited Fri May 3, 2019, 11:32 PM - Edit history (1)
THIS ROUND !! Writing on wall. Nothing is gonna happen. We won't get shit out of Mueller, if we even see him. We won't get the IRS chief in...no taxes. We won't see anyone. We won't see unredacted report- will be held up in court. Even if we hold people in contempt...so what.
I have been the biggest impeachment proponent...but they won't do it and support and outrage over report has dwindled and his approvals rebounding. We needed to hit asap and we didn't.
So, we now 66% of the Dems who wanted impeachment are being ignored. (In the 80s in December) We have no place to go and we hate trump enough to walk on glass to vote against him.
And then, to add insult to be injury, we have to watch our leaders treating this criminal with respect at the WH regarding this infrastructure bill. Giving him his campaign promise and taking away our one winning issue - debt. All he has to do is say... "Debt? They went along with 2 trillion!."
And every argument against impeachment now coming true anyway without him being held to justice..win or lose. Trump prancing with full victory. And rubbing it in our noses by kissing ass with Putin.
Time to lick our wounds and move on. Focus on protecting our vote in 2020. Or we will be stuck for 4 extra years of horror.
zaj
(3,433 posts)The fight still needs to be had. But it's about Congress, transparency, democracy, elections and 2020.
Mueller is a part of it.
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Time for us to wrap our wounds and put on our armor and live to fight another day and even harder.....
No way give up and move on.....
Now is when we get even tougher and fight harder....
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Gotten away with his crimes to date...imho that is
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)mazzarro
(3,450 posts)Germans did not bomb Pear Harbor; Japanese did.
Aristus
(66,409 posts)Everyone in the world knows it was the Japanese, except Bluto Blutarski.
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)malaise
(269,087 posts)Have a drink - the Con will be caught
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,761 posts)still_one
(92,266 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,761 posts)in the role of Brunnhilde in Richard Wagner's Götterdämmerung, the last of the immensely long, four-opera Ring Cycle. Brunnhilde is usually depicted as a well-upholstered lady who appears for a ten-minute solo to conclude the opera before she rides into the flames.
still_one
(92,266 posts)Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)... Yogi Berra. Im not very refined. 🤪
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,761 posts)who would say "It ain't over till the fat lady sings" as a color commentator on Monday Night Football in the early 70's. It was never conclusively established that he was literally referring to Wagner's operas, or operas in general, but that's the usual interpretation.
Ligyron
(7,636 posts)Bamberg Germany, 1978. Never saw as many SS in my whole 2 years stationed there as I did in those 2 days my parents and I spent visiting.
They grow a lot of hops vines around there too.
Bier there isn't half bad either.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)You gave me the gift of humor. I needed it, still smiling at memories of the horrors of enduring a few ten-minute solos.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)Aristus
(66,409 posts)Sopranos assaying the role of Brunnhilde aren't always fat these days,and many can be quite fetching. Brunnhilde is supposed to be a beautiful former goddess made mortal. These are the last twenty minutes or so of a musical experience that comes in at around fifteen hours total. The themes she sings and the orchestra plays are the culmination of an incredibly complex musical development that span that entire period. They may not make much sense to the casual listener. But if you can listen to the whole series, your persistence will be rewarded.
LakeArenal
(28,827 posts)I dont even read that many primary threads anymore.
Joe 20/20. I hardly care about the VP. I have definite favorites but Im putting my faith in Democrats one more time.
Win Democrats.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)attempts. Playing the victim card will start working better and better.
Heartstrings
(7,349 posts)actually got off those couches and get to the polls we will win!
They need a strong message other than "trump is bad".....
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Heartstrings
(7,349 posts)"Our message needs to speak to the concerns of the demographics", or something to that effect....not a direct quote.
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)struggle4progress
(118,309 posts)in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value"
Thomas Paine
23 December 1776
Chin music
(23,002 posts)Nice.
lordsummerisle
(4,651 posts)I always liked that phrase "the summer soldier and the sunshine patriot"...
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Ive said this a bunch of times lately, no one ever won a war by throwing up their hands in despair. Ever.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Our forebears handled quite a lot more with far less complaint.
kentuck
(111,106 posts)I have little enthusiasm to vote.
BigmanPigman
(51,613 posts)Dems being disappointed and frustrated and not voting. I have been told in replies that by seeing that this is really happening I am putting a damper on DU discussions and accused of troll-like behavior.
onecaliberal
(32,873 posts)TwilightZone
(25,472 posts)The only realistic way to get rid of Trump is to vote him out. It always was.
Fortunately, most Democrats seem to be more than ready to do so. CNN's poll showed that a record percentage of voters are enthusiastic about voting in 2020. DU is one of the only places I've been where this kind of defeatism is common.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)That GOP voters more enthusiastic than we are? There's no way. I would crawl on broken glass to vote against him.
SunSeeker
(51,576 posts)It does not appear anyone has read the Mueller Report besides Elizabeth Warren and Hillary Clinton (both of whom are calling for impeachment proceedings).
BigmanPigman
(51,613 posts)Pachamama
(16,887 posts)SunSeeker
(51,576 posts)Response to SunSeeker (Reply #40)
emmaverybo This message was self-deleted by its author.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,761 posts)The only realistic way to get rid of Trump is to vote him out. It always was.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Has won with getting away with his crimes.
But he is now emboldened. He talked in private to freaking Putin today!!!!
We must turn our focus to protecting vote.
Bleacher Creature
(11,257 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Every move, public doesn't care anymore. Time to move to protect vote because he WILL try and rig.
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)But, if you feel better wringing your hands and gnashing your teeth, you go right ahead.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)something good will mysteriously happen.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)manor321
(3,344 posts)I will be writing to more than a dozen congress members to demand they start an impeachment inquiry.
BigmanPigman
(51,613 posts)Calling works well too.
SunSeeker
(51,576 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Won't give green light. If she does I would be completely shocked.
struggle4progress
(118,309 posts)TwilightZone
(25,472 posts)Infrastructure in this country is in desperate need of attention. If we have an opportunity to do something constructive about it, we should, regardless of whether or not Trump considers it a win. He considers everything a win.
If there's something wrong with the deal being discussed, that's one thing. If your objection to it is solely based on Trump doing a victory lap, everyone already knows he does a victory lap about everything, so one more would be meaningless and just blend into the rest of the nonsense.
"And every argument against impeachment now coming true anyway without him being held to justice"
Impeachment and acquittal isn't justice. It's an acquittal. You're worried that he'd do a victory lap about infrastructure, but not acquittal?
Pursuing impeachment as a tool to get Democrats elected in 2020 is one thing and an argument in favor, assuming one believes that the backlash wouldn't outweigh the benefits, but if you're looking for justice, that was never going to happen with impeachment. He's more likely to face justice post-presidency. It may be the only way he might face justice.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Most Americans expect their representatives to get things done - at least TRY! While some diehards on the left want our leaders to do nothing but hate and fight Trump, the rest of us want government to continue working. And the average person trying to get to work on potholed streets and crumbling bridges aren't interested in hearing "We're not doing anything to improve your life, but we sure ZINGED it to Trump today, didn't we?!"
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)
gldstwmn This message was self-deleted by its author.
struggle4progress
(118,309 posts)for the people, shall not perish from the earth
Response to struggle4progress (Reply #29)
gldstwmn This message was self-deleted by its author.
struggle4progress
(118,309 posts)One coup is a permanent precedent for an everlasting sequence of following coups
Response to struggle4progress (Reply #91)
gldstwmn This message was self-deleted by its author.
triron
(22,007 posts)struggle4progress
(118,309 posts)The current game is not to find the best way of expressing anger and outrage: it is developing a practical view of the political context
triron
(22,007 posts)'rhetoric'. Putin installed Trump. Not the (deceived) American people.
spin
(17,493 posts)Plus dont forget civilians are not disarmed in this nation as they are in Venezuela.
In my opinion it is best to wait for 2020 and allow the voters to determine Trumps future. A peaceful change of power is always preferable.
Of course that assumes Trump doesnt become a total tyrant or dictator. In that case all bets are off.
Response to spin (Reply #48)
gldstwmn This message was self-deleted by its author.
spin
(17,493 posts)AncientGeezer
(2,146 posts)Congress.. NOT the military is responsible for ArtII. Sec4.
AlexSFCA
(6,139 posts)it will be for decades as democracy will be destroyed during that time. Second of all, trump wants house to impeach him so that senate can quickly exonerate him which will gurantee his victory in 2020. We now have to make a choice: either to fulfill our constitutional duty and impeach trump (and barr) or focus on winning 2020. I would argue that, considering the circumstances, there is nothing more important than winning in 2020.
Poiuyt
(18,127 posts)History shows just the opposite.
TwilightZone
(25,472 posts)Clinton was impeached in his second term, so reelection was irrelevant. Nixon was in his second term, as well, when impeachment was recommended by the House. Johnson was 150 years ago and in the midst of unique circumstances.
Impeachment is so infrequent that making historical comparisons is misguided, at best. Each situation, including Trump's, was and is unique, with unique considerations. No one knows what the electorate's reaction would be to an impeachment and an acquittal, though a lot of people certainly insist that they do.
Poiuyt
(18,127 posts)I was objecting to the poster who said that impeachment would guarantee Trump reelection. I can see both sides of the debate as far as to whether or not Democrats should start impeachment hearings. My statement about history was based on Republicans losing the white house after the Nixon almost impeachment and Democrats losing the White House after the Clinton impeachment. And Clinton was a lot more popular than Trump. You might want to read this short article about the consequences of impeachment:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/13/opinion/clinton-impeachment-republicans-trump.html?register=email&auth=register-email
snip-
Furthermore, in the fall of 1998, at the first opportunity for voters to express their feelings at the ballot box after the House voted to begin an impeachment inquiry, the Democrats picked up five seats in the House of Representatives, an embarrassment that drove Newt Gingrich from the speakers office.
But consider what followed.
First, the Republicans went on to take or hold the White House in three of the next five presidential elections including the 2016 race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
And while Democrats did gain a handful of House seats in midterm elections in 1998, the Republicans maintained control for eight more years, until disapproval of the Iraq war finally tipped Congress to the Democrats in 2006.
On the Senate side in 1998, the Republicans maintained their 55-45 majority. With the exception of a 17-month window in 2002 and 2003, Republicans controlled the Senate until 2006. In short, the Republican wave of 1994 endured for nearly a decade after the failed impeachment.
Its true that Mr. Clinton was not removed from office, but Republicans used the fact of his impeachment as a cudgel first against his vice president, Al Gore, and later against his wife. While its impact cant be quantified, it sure didnt help either in their election bids.
Finally, and most important, the very myth that the 1998 impeachment hurt Republicans protects them today, when pressure to move against Mr. Trump is met with concerns about the political fallout. Clearly, we need to reconsider that myth.
triron
(22,007 posts)Please convince me otherwise.
world wide wally
(21,748 posts)Pour me a drink too.
Then we'll talk about this
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)This is a long process.
sheshe2
(83,807 posts)Geez!
This is far from over.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)know. Maybe some new crime that Mueller didn't know about? I hope that happens but based on everything he has done... people don't seem to care much. His approval dipped to 39% right after report came out. The news was animated and you could tell they were thinking something would be done. But we didn't act immediately...at least announcing we were moving to impeach. So then, press and now people are saying...well if it wasn't important enough then we will move on too.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)And impeachment was not the first thing that happened.
Grasswire2
(13,571 posts)NEVER.
You think this country was established by sunshine patriots?
You think it was defended here and abroad by weakness and capitulation?
Talk like that demeans the personal sacrifices and oceans of blood spilled in the cause of liberty over the generations.
BeyondGeography
(39,376 posts)Even her once stalwart supporter Charles Pierce is confused:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/amp27355012/nancy-pelosi-impeach-donald-trump-democrats/
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)SeattleVet
(5,477 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Hopelessness is not a motivator.
So I ask what the purpose is of this venting.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)For getting justice for Mueller report crimes
brush
(53,794 posts)It's hardly over.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)To see the writing on wall (as outlined in OP, and work on protecting vote
brush
(53,794 posts)now by Nadler. And his team is upset about Barr's lies, they may yet leak the unredacted report. There's a long way to the election and who knows what will unfold.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)so many years.
Just can't see Mueller having the bombshells we are hoping for- for one and ONLY one reason. If he had the dirt, like real game changer dirt, Trump and Barr would be working overtime to block any kind of disclosure from him - that could potentially hurt Trump. Skepticism.
But, guess despite it all, of coursem deep inside, I am still hoping.
triron
(22,007 posts)The senate intelligence committee is non-partisan?? Bullshit.
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)Some Democrats were overly invested in impeachment. It still serves the purpose for hearings. The House should investigate every complaint from Trump with public hearings and expose his every fn lie.
Trump tries to make the narrative about spying hold hearings and expose his be ess.
TwilightZone
(25,472 posts)It seems that a lot of people looked at impeachment as some kind of magic wand of justice or a way to get rid of Trump. It was never going to be either.
As you noted, it would serve the purpose of further exposing Trump, but it is not a removal tool. The most realistic way to get rid of Trump was always going to be to vote him out in 2020.
triron
(22,007 posts)Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)You have already given into idea that the Democrats in this country cannot get enough votes to overcome Russian interference that has never quantified.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,438 posts)because Congress hasn't initiated Impeachment proceedings? Has anyone on our side seen the Mueller Report in its entirety? No? Are there multiple investigations into tRumpy that the White House is fighting tooth and nail? Yes. And on and on.
Long story short. For those of you cupcakes that were never in a real fight - it doesn't really start until you get up off the ground after you've gone down a few times.
sheshe2
(83,807 posts)because Congress hasn't initiated Impeachment proceedings?
With you here. How many days have we/they had that huge 4 page summary of a 400 page report that was two years in the making. How many days have we had that fully redacted report?
You are correct. No is the answer.
Far more than you can count on two hands.
Love your last paragraph, NoMoreRepugs.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Its a series of investigations and hearings that pretty much follow the same rules and procedures that any other committee or proceeding would follow.
Any information gathered in an impeachment inquiry can also be obtained through other inquiries by other committees.
This notion that, if the House starts impeachment immediately, treasures of information will suddenly flow like mighty streams, administration officials will loosen their tongues and admit their criminality, Trump will be run out of office, and Democracy will be saved just isnt a reality. Thats not how it works.
This is a slow, hard process whether its done as an impeachment inquiry or otherwise. The House has started and is digging and pushing on many fronts, which is exactly as it should be. Im grateful they arent allowing themselves to be bullied into jumping ahead of themselves and screwing it up.
Im glad Im not alone on this!
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)TwilightZone
(25,472 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Irishxs
(622 posts)and being a decent democrat. It seems like evil is winning every day.
WheelWalker
(8,955 posts)standingtall
(2,785 posts)I think the game changer is going to come when whoever the Democratic front runner for President is starts calling for impeachment and I think eventually that will happen despite Warren being the only one to call for it so far.
sarabelle
(453 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)mountain grammy
(26,630 posts)The Supreme Court is gone for good.
Too many Americans are just stupid.
The economy is good.. too good but it just keep chugging along.
Too many Americans are just stupid.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)officials dont.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)I will be the happiest wrong person on Earth.
SunSeeker
(51,576 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,071 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(15,631 posts)Not a shotgun approach, but surgical snipers designed to inflict maximum fear into the obstructionists.
The deadline for the full Meuller report expires Monday. In addition, I heard reports on MSNBC that contempt proceeding are expected to begin on Monday. Those should be the opening shots across the bow, that, if ignored, should turn into targeted political and legal head shots.
The Constitution can't wait.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)that even if we hold them in contempt, they will not be able to throw them in jail. It will be a fine...and it all will whither away.
It's not like I haven't thought about every angle. Read it could be 20 years before a full redacted report is seen.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,631 posts)If this is war, we've got to start thinking like insurgents.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)But you can bet Pelosi and Nader and Schiff and Waters and Cummings, etc. and their lawyers and experts do and have looked at and considered every one of them from every possible perspective.
They know what theyre doing. Were just on the sidelines guessing based on the fraction of information we know.
Turbineguy
(37,355 posts)Laugh on you suckers!
Well, maybe. He will delay it however.
revmclaren
(2,524 posts)ONLY!!! 2019 and beyond.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)revmclaren
(2,524 posts)ONLY!!! 2019 and beyond.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)walkingman
(7,633 posts)behavior and look the other way while he acts like he has done his whole life. Talk shit and have others cover for his sorry ass. The only way to beat him is to ignore his mouth and legislate him to the nervious breakdown stage. After that his only solution will be war which the country will reject.
doc03
(35,354 posts)incumbent president ever lost with an economy like that?
We all know Trump inherited the longest economic expansion in history. But Democrats failed to take credit for it. Nearly everyone I talk to has been brainwashed into thinking the economy was bad under Obama.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)that we haven't had any media strategy to counter what trump says over and over. Unchallenged repetition true or false works.
I_have_had_enough
(41 posts)Always fight.
You will never win without fighting.
Time to redouble efforts.
Mme. Defarge
(8,035 posts)Captain Zero
(6,813 posts)Anyone But Trump - 2020.
Short, sweet. No one they can target.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)Never have put a fellow DUer on ignore. Youre the first. May you forever be the only.
The edit history for the OP pushed me over the edge.
Good bye
ZZenith
(4,125 posts)Tipperary
(6,930 posts)EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Most of the rest of us aren't as easily cowed. He hasn't beaten us and he won't.
Please at least stay out of the way while we handle this (don't worry, we'll save your ass, too ...)
lark
(23,123 posts)drumpf isn't going to be there for 8 years without totally destroying our constitution and way of life - hes PUtin's puppet and he just won't be able to resist the temptation to totally destroy us via the orange meance and russian repugs everywhere. The fascists run Russia, SA and Israel and they will not rest until they run the USA as well and drumpf is their leading edge that is already hard at work to make the designation democracy a total joke.
ismnotwasm
(41,995 posts)Paladin
(28,266 posts)Spare us, OK?
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)A knife to a gun fight.
doompatrol39
(428 posts)..I really don't care how it used to be or the lack of comity or civility or disrespect for the parameters of the office of President or of Congress. We are so far beyond that, and watching our leaders try to "shame" the other side or point out their hypocrisy while the other side laughs all the way to the bank of the back of the American public is pathetic and maddening.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Bayard
(22,108 posts)DEMOCRATS---we--are the last, best hope for this country.