Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

misanthrope

(7,417 posts)
Fri May 10, 2019, 04:02 AM May 2019

You think you're sickened now, if RBG passes away in the next two years

Last edited Fri May 10, 2019, 06:19 AM - Edit history (2)

then the open jubilation expressed by much of this nation will rankle not just you but likely the world. It will be one of the most ghoulish displays America has exhibited in a long history of such things.

EDIT TO ADD: The first dozen or so responses to this post are trying way too hard to find something that isn't here. This isn't a discussion about RBG's actions or decisions in any form but simply the anticipation as to the craven behavior that will undoubtedly be shown by the right wing should she expire during the Trump administration. That's all.

It's not about her. It's about them and their continual lowering of the bar. The current round of Draconian and preposterous state laws regarding women's rights to choose are a vision into the fervency that will cause America's id to even further disgust other nations.

84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You think you're sickened now, if RBG passes away in the next two years (Original Post) misanthrope May 2019 OP
yes Skittles May 2019 #1
Scuse me canetoad May 2019 #2
That was counting chickens. madaboutharry May 2019 #3
CORRECT Skittles May 2019 #7
Sadly, it's true... Drunken Irishman May 2019 #9
Let be sure to beat up Thurgood Marshall as well... brooklynite May 2019 #42
Justice Marshall was only 68 when Carter became president. madaboutharry May 2019 #44
Remind us of who the replacement was... brooklynite May 2019 #47
Sarcasm, I must assume... pangaia May 2019 #77
she should have retired regardless of who was the next president Skittles May 2019 #6
why? pangaia May 2019 #78
This isn't about her misanthrope May 2019 #14
And left TWO seats instead of one for McConnell to hold open for Trump to fill? StarfishSaver May 2019 #21
McConnell pulled his stunt Obama's last year Skittles May 2019 #51
He pulled this stunt for the first Obama SC nomination in his second term StarfishSaver May 2019 #63
EIGHT YEARS Skittles May 2019 #73
You think RBG should have stepped down in Obama's first term? StarfishSaver May 2019 #76
during Obama's TERM, yes I do, absolutely Skittles May 2019 #81
Yup BeyondGeography May 2019 #26
If she'd stepped down during Obama, McConnell would have added another SCOTUS seat to his roster. lagomorph777 May 2019 #33
McConnell pulled his stunt Obama's last year Skittles May 2019 #52
He would have pulled that stunt more often if he could; he'd use some other justification. lagomorph777 May 2019 #62
RBG is only 5 years older than Justice Breyer StarfishSaver May 2019 #64
That is interesting. You make a good point. suffragette May 2019 #74
I notice we don't have Merrick Garland on the Court. Obama couldn't force the GOP to budge.nt Hekate May 2019 #39
once again Skittles May 2019 #53
I think Clarence Thomas wants to step down secondwind May 2019 #4
There's a good chance both Thomas and Alito retire this year or next. briv1016 May 2019 #13
If there is an opening created NEXT YEAR, a PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION YEAR...McConnell Rule prevails. Fla Dem May 2019 #23
McConnell rule is only for Democratic Presidents. Isn't this already true? marylandblue May 2019 #31
Yea, he wouldn't want to ruin the stellar country-first image he has now. briv1016 May 2019 #46
Good chance? rusty fender May 2019 #41
Thomas has and Alito is only 2 years younger. briv1016 May 2019 #45
Why? They have lifetime appointments. comradebillyboy May 2019 #48
Because they're both around 70. briv1016 May 2019 #50
Sheesh. SO Trump could get 3 MORE picks? fescuerescue May 2019 #65
YES HE COULD Skittles May 2019 #82
Whether she did or didn't, it isn't germane misanthrope May 2019 #15
I know what you're talking about, I've seen it firsthand Brawndo May 2019 #43
No, don't stop them misanthrope May 2019 #59
Exactly, the grave-dancing by the scum-wing will be absolutely grotesque. MH1 May 2019 #49
That's one of the things I like about this site fescuerescue May 2019 #68
RBG is worthy of a hell of a lot more respect than is being shown on this thread. That is all. hlthe2b May 2019 #5
I'm not disrespecting her Skittles May 2019 #8
It is not disrespectful to speak of an opinion that is shared by many who also admire her. madaboutharry May 2019 #11
Because if she would have retired in Obama's 2nd term TheRealNorth May 2019 #25
I agree and the reason was discussed openly then LakeArenal May 2019 #27
And we would have three Trump justices on the the Supreme Court instead of two StarfishSaver May 2019 #35
And keep a seat open for 4 years? madaboutharry May 2019 #40
McConnell was threatening to do just that TheRealNorth May 2019 #61
threatening and doing are different things fescuerescue May 2019 #69
Sure TheRealNorth May 2019 #72
They don't care about the voters fescuerescue May 2019 #83
Thank you StarfishSaver May 2019 #22
Point! LakeArenal May 2019 #28
OMG Skittles May 2019 #54
This! mcar May 2019 #84
They would love to replace her during an election year too RandiFan1290 May 2019 #10
I agree, she showed horrible judgement by not stepping down in 2009. LenaBaby61 May 2019 #17
I regret your need to rally so much resentment for this exceptional woman. Judi Lynn May 2019 #12
I'm not "attempting" to do any such thing misanthrope May 2019 #16
You've obviously somehow missed the grave dancing cwydro May 2019 #29
I am not as regular in this place as many are misanthrope May 2019 #60
Misanthrope: LakeArenal May 2019 #30
That is EXACTLY what is happening here. It is shameful, proving only that we don't DESERVE HER. hlthe2b May 2019 #20
hoo boy Skittles May 2019 #55
Why are realists and pragmatists such downers. LakeArenal May 2019 #32
Why make up some future scenario? Tipperary May 2019 #18
I love her MFM008 May 2019 #19
The first dozen or so responses are typical of the type ismnotwasm May 2019 #24
but, but, those who refused to vote for the Democratic nominee in 2016 told us that the SC didn't still_one May 2019 #34
It's Hillary's fault that people didn't vote for her. It's RBG's fault that she didn't quit her job StarfishSaver May 2019 #36
Ya nailed it starfish still_one May 2019 #37
I'm not a fan of preemptive suffering. It's not good for us. nolabear May 2019 #38
No one is suffering misanthrope May 2019 #58
That's an amazing fact fescuerescue May 2019 #67
Look up studies on the long term effect of cortisol misanthrope May 2019 #70
It's at the heart of PTSD. The limbic system is in overdrive. nolabear May 2019 #71
Thank You So Much For Adding Another Layer Of Worry To This Day Me. May 2019 #56
"if RBG passes away" mitch96 May 2019 #57
Need an Amendment limiting the number of SC picks a President is allowed fescuerescue May 2019 #66
On the other hand he might get 0 more. n/t PoliticAverse May 2019 #79
But Susan Saranwrap said that Hillary was worse than Trump. NurseJackie May 2019 #75
I respect her wisdom, but she should have retired. Hassler May 2019 #80

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
1. yes
Fri May 10, 2019, 04:03 AM
May 2019

which is why it kills me she did not step down when Obama was president.....enough of this fawning already

madaboutharry

(40,212 posts)
3. That was counting chickens.
Fri May 10, 2019, 04:38 AM
May 2019

I think she was selfish. She didn’t want to give up being on the SC. It is a very special life these justices live. I feel she put herself before the country.

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
7. CORRECT
Fri May 10, 2019, 05:23 AM
May 2019

there's a lot to admire about her but she should have stepped down by now - I am tired of the endless fawning

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
9. Sadly, it's true...
Fri May 10, 2019, 05:32 AM
May 2019

She should have understood her role and the importance of that seat. Had she stepped down shortly into 2013, there's very little chance that seat is at risk of flipping to a conservative.

Now we just gotta hope she can make it two years - if not longer.

brooklynite

(94,585 posts)
42. Let be sure to beat up Thurgood Marshall as well...
Fri May 10, 2019, 12:52 PM
May 2019

...for not stepping down during the Carter Administration...

madaboutharry

(40,212 posts)
44. Justice Marshall was only 68 when Carter became president.
Fri May 10, 2019, 01:06 PM
May 2019

Those were different times. Republicans were different. The comparison is silly.

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
63. He pulled this stunt for the first Obama SC nomination in his second term
Fri May 10, 2019, 03:19 PM
May 2019

You don't think he would have done it if RBG's seat came open in how last two years?

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
81. during Obama's TERM, yes I do, absolutely
Fri May 10, 2019, 06:29 PM
May 2019

I remember wishing both she and Breyer would step down because I knew Obama would chose quality replacements

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
33. If she'd stepped down during Obama, McConnell would have added another SCOTUS seat to his roster.
Fri May 10, 2019, 11:19 AM
May 2019

How would that have helped anything?

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
62. He would have pulled that stunt more often if he could; he'd use some other justification.
Fri May 10, 2019, 03:13 PM
May 2019

And I don't think the RBG discussion was year-specific.

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
64. RBG is only 5 years older than Justice Breyer
Fri May 10, 2019, 03:21 PM
May 2019

So it's interesting that HE's not being subjected to the "should stepped down so he won't dies on the job" insults.

Skittles

(153,164 posts)
53. once again
Fri May 10, 2019, 01:45 PM
May 2019

McConnell used the weak excuse that an election was imminent. Obama was president for eight years.

secondwind

(16,903 posts)
4. I think Clarence Thomas wants to step down
Fri May 10, 2019, 05:06 AM
May 2019

this summer. I have to say that I, too, wanted Ginsberg to step down under Obama.

Oh well.



briv1016

(1,570 posts)
13. There's a good chance both Thomas and Alito retire this year or next.
Fri May 10, 2019, 06:08 AM
May 2019

Especially if Donald's poll numbers start to go down.

Fla Dem

(23,677 posts)
23. If there is an opening created NEXT YEAR, a PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION YEAR...McConnell Rule prevails.
Fri May 10, 2019, 10:34 AM
May 2019

This is what McConnell established when SCJ Scalia died in 2016 leaving open a vacancy that Trump filled in 2017 with Neil Gorsch. Democrats should stand firm in resisting any attempt of the Senate trying to fill a vacancy in 2020. If McConnell ignores his own rule it will be so very transparent what a crook and thief he is for all of America to see.

briv1016

(1,570 posts)
45. Thomas has and Alito is only 2 years younger.
Fri May 10, 2019, 01:07 PM
May 2019

Besides, they'll be compelled to if it starts to look like Donald will lose.

briv1016

(1,570 posts)
50. Because they're both around 70.
Fri May 10, 2019, 01:40 PM
May 2019

Replacing them with 50 year olds buys them an additional 40 years of conservative influence on the court. (Barring random early deaths.)

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
65. Sheesh. SO Trump could get 3 MORE picks?
Fri May 10, 2019, 03:50 PM
May 2019

That's a total of 5.

Has ANY President ever gotten 5 picks outside of George Washington?

misanthrope

(7,417 posts)
15. Whether she did or didn't, it isn't germane
Fri May 10, 2019, 06:20 AM
May 2019

I'm talking about the deplorables showing their asses for the world to see.

Brawndo

(535 posts)
43. I know what you're talking about, I've seen it firsthand
Fri May 10, 2019, 12:55 PM
May 2019

Repugs at work, sharing articles about RBG's health. I've seen the jackal smiles of "Men" who salivate at the thought of the passing of an elderly woman. I can't post what it makes me want to do to them.

misanthrope

(7,417 posts)
59. No, don't stop them
Fri May 10, 2019, 02:39 PM
May 2019

Don't encourage it but if anything, let them feel even more free to exhibit as much to the public. Let them create backlash without realizing what they are doing.

MH1

(17,600 posts)
49. Exactly, the grave-dancing by the scum-wing will be absolutely grotesque.
Fri May 10, 2019, 01:24 PM
May 2019

I think all of us are praying for RBG every day.

madaboutharry

(40,212 posts)
11. It is not disrespectful to speak of an opinion that is shared by many who also admire her.
Fri May 10, 2019, 05:35 AM
May 2019

No one is disrespecting her or her legacy on the court. But it can not be denied that she was not thinking about the future of the country. She was being selfish by refusing to step down during a time when a liberal seat on the court could have been secured for many decades to come. if she had stepped down at the beginning of President Obama's second term things would not be as precarious as they are now. That is a fact.

TheRealNorth

(9,481 posts)
25. Because if she would have retired in Obama's 2nd term
Fri May 10, 2019, 11:09 AM
May 2019

You are betting Mitch McConnel would not have blocked a replacement.

While Democrats held the Senate Majority until 2014, we were still operating with filibusters could block SC nominees.

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
35. And we would have three Trump justices on the the Supreme Court instead of two
Fri May 10, 2019, 11:28 AM
May 2019

And that third justice would not have been RBG.

I'm glad she stayed.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
69. threatening and doing are different things
Fri May 10, 2019, 03:59 PM
May 2019

I don't think he could have gotten away with 4 years.

Because payback is a bitch and we would do the same.

16 years of that and the SC would be vacant.

TheRealNorth

(9,481 posts)
72. Sure
Fri May 10, 2019, 05:32 PM
May 2019

Because Republican voters are gonna hold him accountable for stances that the Republican base approves of.

Paybacks a bitch only if you are in a place that you can deliver the payback. Mitch and Republicans are fixing the rules so that they will never be held to account.

 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
22. Thank you
Fri May 10, 2019, 10:17 AM
May 2019

What's with the "The old lady should have gone away years ago so she wouldn't die on us" insults of one of greatest living heroes?

RandiFan1290

(6,235 posts)
10. They would love to replace her during an election year too
Fri May 10, 2019, 05:34 AM
May 2019

Just to stick it in a little further.

I agree, she showed horrible judgement by not stepping down in 2009.

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
17. I agree, she showed horrible judgement by not stepping down in 2009.
Fri May 10, 2019, 06:44 AM
May 2019

IF the rumors I read were true, her daughter tried to reason with her to step down from the bench in 2009 due to age/health concerns. But RBG 'allegedly' wasn't having any of it.

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
12. I regret your need to rally so much resentment for this exceptional woman.
Fri May 10, 2019, 05:37 AM
May 2019

It really couldn't hurt to live with the facts, and hope for the best. We're all acquainted with the situation completely, and can't possibly want to hear how many people want to rail on about her.

What we want is to get to a safer world as soon as possible without losing hope. We NEED to have hope to survive.

misanthrope

(7,417 posts)
16. I'm not "attempting" to do any such thing
Fri May 10, 2019, 06:22 AM
May 2019

That was how some people chose to view my comment about the lack of humanity in so many right wingers these days.

misanthrope

(7,417 posts)
60. I am not as regular in this place as many are
Fri May 10, 2019, 02:45 PM
May 2019

Though when I've seen it in the past, I've sometimes commented in sincere disagreement. Other times, I just shake my head and move on.

I didn't agree with people like George H. W. or Barbara Bush, or John McCain but I didn't celebrate their demise.

I couldn't stand Ronald and Nancy Reagan but I didn't "celebrate" their deaths. It just conjured my contempt for them.

The depths to which so many have sunk now in following the example of Trump ensures the "happy feet" would break out for the discussed scenario.

LakeArenal

(28,819 posts)
32. Why are realists and pragmatists such downers.
Fri May 10, 2019, 11:18 AM
May 2019

This woman has given everything to make it through this crisis.

Thank gawd for her.

still_one

(92,207 posts)
34. but, but, those who refused to vote for the Democratic nominee in 2016 told us that the SC didn't
Fri May 10, 2019, 11:20 AM
May 2019

matter


 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
36. It's Hillary's fault that people didn't vote for her. It's RBG's fault that she didn't quit her job
Fri May 10, 2019, 11:36 AM
May 2019

Pelosi is a lightning rod.

Hmmm. Could there be a pattern here?

nolabear

(41,984 posts)
38. I'm not a fan of preemptive suffering. It's not good for us.
Fri May 10, 2019, 12:12 PM
May 2019

I mean that literally. Take it from an old shrink. The brain produces the same stress chemicals with strongly imagined suffering (when you believe it, rational or not) as it does with real suffering. It lowers the threshold for anxiety, interferes with learning, overwhelms coping mechanisms and so interferes with relationships. They become narrow, survival-focused, and age the body and brain considerably.

The need to post something like this might indicate you’re already there and are looking for communication and reinforcement to help your particular way of coping. There’s nothing at ALL to feel bad about with that. I do it. Everyone does to varying degrees. But contrary to what we believe, it hurts far more than it helps.

They’re giving us enough real trauma. We have to hold onto hope and use all the power we have. Hang in there! ❤️ (And I know this sounds preachy but I can’t do it any better.)

misanthrope

(7,417 posts)
58. No one is suffering
Fri May 10, 2019, 02:36 PM
May 2019

Once again, what i said is not about Ginsberg in any fashion. No anxiety from thoughts of her demise, no regrets or nail-baiting. We all die and few times are those deaths opportune.

No sweat. Just life. C'est la vie. "Ask not for whom the bell tolls" and all.

It. Is. Solely. About. The. Craven. Display. To. Be. Shown.

In casual parlance, "those pricks are really going to show their asses to world if RBG's death allows Trump to pick a justice." If anything, I find it darkly humorous so many won't be able to prevent themselves from revealing their character to a shocked globe. Look at the trendsetters for their behavior: Trump and McConnell. The acolytes will follow suit, then attempt to rationalize it by falling back on their ostensibly religious beliefs. They can't avoid it.

Let 'em dance and gloat. The more the better. The perversity of them ruining their own reputations will be amusing to me. Highly. Let's call it, "just rewards."

My "need to post something like this" was for others who able to find dark humor in such scenarios. Life is too short not to laugh.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
67. That's an amazing fact
Fri May 10, 2019, 03:56 PM
May 2019

That I'm going to take with me from now on.

I've long said that it's bad to "borrow" pain from the future worrying about possible bad things (that we cannot influence). I didn't know until now that's physical and well as Karma related.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
66. Need an Amendment limiting the number of SC picks a President is allowed
Fri May 10, 2019, 03:53 PM
May 2019

Trump might get 4 or 5 picks before this is all over.

Hassler

(3,379 posts)
80. I respect her wisdom, but she should have retired.
Fri May 10, 2019, 05:56 PM
May 2019

The GOPee didn't claim the Senate until 2014. Moscow Mitch couldn't have stopped Obama. Reid had already done away with filibustering some judges, and would have for SCOTUS.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You think you're sickened...