Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 11:50 PM Jan 2012

The Path to Persia Brookings Institute for regime change in Iran

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/NA05Ak03.html

What we are seeing in Syria is a deliberate and calculated campaign to bring down the Assad government so as to replace it with a regime "more compatible" with US interests in the region.

The blueprint for this project is essentially a report produced by the neo-conservative Brookings Institute for regime change in Iran in 2009. The report - "Which Path to Persia?" - continues to be the generic strategic approach for US-led regime change in the region.

A rereading of it, together with the more recent "Towards a Post-Assad Syria" (which adopts the same language and perspective, but focuses on Syria, and was recently produced by two US neo-conservative think-tanks) illustrates how developments in Syria have been shaped according to the step-by-step approach detailed in the "Paths to Persia" report with the same key objective: regime change.

The authors of these reports include, among others, John Hannah and Martin Indyk, both former senior neo-conservative officials from the George W Bush/Dick Cheney administration, and both advocates for regime change in Syria. [5] Not for the first time are we seeing a close alliance between US/British neo-cons with Islamists (including, reports show [6], some with links to al-Qaeda) working together to bring about regime change in an "enemy" state.


Is this the playbook we are following?
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Path to Persia Brookings Institute for regime change in Iran (Original Post) lovuian Jan 2012 OP
Bush called Syria and Iran evildoers ...Is this the NeoCon PNAC plan? lovuian Jan 2012 #1
So why are the Arab League in Syria now? tabatha Jan 2012 #2
Just wow. Those fuckers. nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2012 #3
Just checking lovuian Jan 2012 #4

lovuian

(19,362 posts)
1. Bush called Syria and Iran evildoers ...Is this the NeoCon PNAC plan?
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 12:04 AM
Jan 2012

Bush has admitted on the record that the "minds" of his administration are "borrowed" from the right-wing think-tank American Enterprise Institute (AEI), which rents office space in Washington to the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) - the people who conceived the Iraq war (see This war is brought to you by ... of March 20, 2003).

Vice President Dick Cheney's concentration of power under Bush II will be even more complete. Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld - despite Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, the quagmire in Iraq - remains in place. The CIA under Porter Goss has been through a Soviet-style purge and is being turned into an ersatz Office of Special Plans (OSP), which everyone remembers was a Rumsfeld-sponsored operation that specialized in fabricating false pretexts for the invasion of Iraq. The OSP was directed by neo-conservative Douglas Feith (who now wants the US to attack Iran). The new CIA is Feith's OSP on steroids. Goss' job is to make sure the CIA agrees with everything Bush and the neo-conservatives say. Expect more wars.

The road to Damascus
The road to Damascus is the key node in the Bush/neo-con roadmap for a new Middle East.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FL17Ak01.html

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
2. So why are the Arab League in Syria now?
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 12:33 AM
Jan 2012

The Arab League monitors were to prevent any foreign intervention.

I would say NO.

Edit: asiatimes is full of crap.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Path to Persia Brooki...