Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDOJ agrees to work with Democrats if House pulls Barr contempt vote
Blackmail? Extortion?https://www.axios.com/justice-department-house-judiciary-bill-barr-contempt-5cb9bbf8-3679-4c4e-9e86-adfe999c711f.html
Zachary Basu
2 hours ago
DOJ agrees to work with Democrats if House pulls Barr contempt vote
The Justice Department has sent a letter to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) informing him that it would be willing to resume negotiations on the committee's subpoena for the full, unredacted Mueller report if the House removes its threat to hold Attorney General Bill Barr in contempt next week.
Details: DOJ claims that Nadler sent a letter on May 24 recognizing that the committee's subpoena is "unworkably broad" and offering for the first time "to narrow the subpoena's scope to cover a much more limited set of documents." In light of this offer, DOJ asserts that it would "hardly make sense" to hold Barr in contempt for not complying with the original subpoena and asks the House Judiciary Committee to withdraw its previous contempt citation so that the two sides can negotiate an accommodation.
Context: The House Judiciary Committee voted last month to hold Barr in contempt for refusing to comply with a subpoena demanding the release of the full Mueller report and its underlying materials. On Monday, Democrats announced that a contempt resolution for Barr and former White House counsel Don McGahn would be brought to the full House floor for a vote.
The new letter from DOJ notes that the department recently negotiated a similar accommodation with the House Intelligence Committee, which had also threatened to hold Barr in contempt.
"The only reason we were not able to engage in a similar accommodation with the Judiciary Committee is that you insisted on taking the unnecessary step of holding a contempt vote less than three weeks before issuing the subpoena, at a time when negotiations were ongoing," DOJ writes.
"The only reason we were not able to engage in a similar accommodation with the Judiciary Committee is that you insisted on taking the unnecessary step of holding a contempt vote less than three weeks before issuing the subpoena, at a time when negotiations were ongoing," DOJ writes.
Why it matters: Much has been made about the potency of contempt citations and whether they would actually have any effect in changing the Trump administration's pattern of stonewalling. Yet his letter marks the second time that the Justice Department has agreed to reopen subpoena negotiations to avoid the threat of contempt.
Democrats pulling Monday's contempt vote would mark a significant de-escalation in tensions with the Justice Department. Chairman Nadler has previously been unwilling to bend to many of the department's demands.
Read the full letter @ link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 849 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ agrees to work with Democrats if House pulls Barr contempt vote (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2019
OP
LOL, sure, they pull the contempt and Barr is back at giving the House the finger.
Thomas Hurt
Jun 2019
#5
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)1. The only proper response
"Let's see the full Mueller report, then we'll talk about just how guilty the AG might be.
charlyvi
(6,537 posts)2. Don't do it!
You've negotiated enough. That's why a subpoena was issued. Rep. Nadler, your committee has a lawful right to see the Special Counsel's report UNREDACTED. Negotiate hell, hold him in contempt.
Owl
(3,642 posts)3. Just say no. Please!
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)4. i completely trust them. HA!
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)5. LOL, sure, they pull the contempt and Barr is back at giving the House the finger.
shanti
(21,675 posts)6. Hell, no, don't do it, Nadler!
Barr NEEDS to be held in contempt, and he is afraid of it.
Gothmog
(145,359 posts)7. House Majority Leader rejects DOJ's offer of documents in return for stopping Barr contempt vote
yonder
(9,668 posts)8. Smoke and mirrors with an extra lump of stonewalling sounds like to me.
HJC needs to take control of this in a dominant fashion. I don't think accommodation is the way to do it.
trof
(54,256 posts)9. Good night! DOJ is BARGAINING to keep the AG from being held in contempt?
My, my...how things have changed.
keithbvadu2
(36,835 posts)10. "work with / resume negotiations" - vague promises, not very promising.
"work with / resume negotiations" - vague promises, not very promising.