General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFox News crosses the line on Joe Biden
While that position puts Fox somewhere in the gray area between journalism and activism, it's not exactly new. There are ratings in partisanship -- so Fox News engages in partisanship.
But even partisanship should have its limits. And one of those limits should be raising entirely unfounded questions about a presidential candidate's health. Which is exactly what two Fox News personalities -- Kennedy and Sean Hannity -- have done, according to this terrific piece by the Daily Beast Justin Baragona:
"Since the end of May, Fox Business Network and Fox News star Lisa 'Kennedy' Montgomery and Fox News prime-time host Sean Hannity have speculated on-air, on at least four separate occasions, that the current Democratic presidential frontrunner is secretly dealing with health issues, often comparing his condition to illness-related conspiracy theories the network pushed about Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election."
https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/10/politics/joe-biden-age-fox-news-oldest-2020-democrats/index.html
marble falls
(57,106 posts)dlk
(11,569 posts)What we are witnessing are the results of a 40-year game plan by Republicans to drown the airwaves with right wing propaganda. The fascists are here.
sop
(10,193 posts)zanana1
(6,122 posts)Thrill
(19,178 posts)Trump isnt likely to beat him in places like Iowa and Pennsylvania
Wounded Bear
(58,670 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)https://www.wonkette.com/fox-news-just-wondering-what-joe-biden-is-dying-from-today
Takket
(21,577 posts)It works and... nothing has been done to stop fake news conspiracy theories so... they are going to keep doing it.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Democrats and empower Republicans. This, of course, being the smoke screen of respectable journalism sent out to attract and keep viewers and obscure the swiftboating.
CNN might have more accurately, and honorably, pointed out that Fox normally operates on the wrong side of the line and not suggested it normally does not.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)than Biden. Fuck Fox.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,841 posts)...but the Fairness Doctrine was only for broadcast media-- TV and Radio-- so Fox would never have been affected by it.
You could argue dropping the Fairness Doctrine did pave the way for Rush Limbaugh and the other RWNJs with radio shows stirring up a market for a big cable fake news outlet but Fox could conceivably have done it either way.
Now Sinclair, on the other hand...