Judge strikes down rule requiring drug ads to reveal prices

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge Monday blocked a major White House initiative on prescription drug costs, saying the Trump administration lacked the legal authority to require drugmakers to disclose their prices in TV ads.

The narrow ruling by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington, D.C., struck down a requirement that was set to go into effect within hours, on Tuesday. Drugmakers had argued that requiring them to disclose list prices amounted to coercion that would violate their free speech rights under the Constitution.

But in his 27-page ruling Mehta avoided debating the First Amendment, saying simply that the Trump administration had failed to show it had legal authority under the statutes that govern federal programs such as Medicare to require price disclosure.

He wrote that neither the law's "text, structure, nor context evince an intent by Congress to empower (administrative agencies) to issue a rule that compels drug manufacturers to disclose list prices."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/judge-strikes-down-rule-requiring-drug-ads-to-reveal-prices/ar-AAE2BLO?li=BBnb7Kz

[sandensea]

1. For once, Cheeto seemed to be doing the right thing (though the devil's probably in the details)

Big Pharma's caterwauling about "coercion" over having to reveal prices reminds me of their reaction when Clinton forced them to reveal side effects in their ads.

"It violates our First Amendment rights!"

"How so?"

"Like the say: it's sexier to conceal than to reveal!"