Paul Krugman on GOP excuses
Paul Krugman Opinion Columnist
NY Times email
"SNIP.....
As you can see from the figure, on the eve of the 2008 financial crisis, the prime-age employment ratio was just shy of 80 percent. When the crisis struck, it dropped to 75 percent, and stayed low for a long time long enough for many influential people to declare, with an air of great wisdom, that prime-age employment would never recover to its previous level.
Why not? Well, declared the Very Serious People (a term I used a lot at the time), U.S. workers just didnt have the skills the modern economy needed. And maybe they lacked motivation too, paying video games instead of working, or turning to drugs and alcohol. Some of us with a sense of history recognized these arguments:
Influential people made similar claims in the 1930s, asserting that high unemployment reflected the inadequacy of American workers, not a simple lack of sufficient demand. But then came World War II, and suddenly all those inadequate workers proved perfectly capable of operating the most awesome defense economy the world had ever seen. Sure enough, after late 2011 prime-age employment began recovering, and it just kept on recovering, year after year. And at this point prime-age employment is right back where it was before the financial crisis. American workers do, it turns out, have both the skills and the motivation to work productively, and did all along. Oh, they may lack some specific skills that employers need but lo and behold, in a tight labor market many employers are willing to take on and train workers who clearly have the native ability to do jobs they havent done before.
So what are we to make of the long trough in employment from 2007 to about 2017? The answer is that it represented a huge waste of human and economic potential. We should have been doing whatever it took to boost the economy, including a lot of infrastructure spending. Instead, our elite obsessed over entitlement reform while insisting that our workers were no good.
.....SNIP"