General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNancy Pelosi Has Power--She Just Doesn't Want to Use It
Its advice that Pelosi may have needed more than any of her colleagues. A Maureen Dowd New York Times column on Sunday quoted the Speaker sniping at a quartet of progressive first-term congresswomen. These people have their public whatever and their Twitter world, Pelosi said, in between boasting about hanging out with Bono and discussing her Napa vineyard. But they didnt have any following. The representatives Pelosi was referring toAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Ayanna Pressleyhad all recently voted against a version of a border funding bill that provided billions of dollars to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), but did so without any of the oversight most House Democrats had originally sought.
...Pelosis approach to impeachment is probably the clearest example of this schism. Fearing that opening impeachment proceedings will distract fromand underminethe 2020 campaign, she has put the brakes on many measures to hold Trump and his administration accountable. Instead, she has made opaque and confusing public statements, claiming that Trump is just not worth it and that he self-impeaches every day. She has similarly declined to go after other Trump officials. Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, most recently, has been rightfully attacked for his shameful handling of a plea deal with billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein while serving as U.S. attorney for Floridas southern district. Pelosi could launch impeachment proceedings against Acosta. Instead she launched a petitionattached to a fundraising ask. While Pelosi has a well-earned reputation for whipping votes and retaining loyalty, thanks in large part to her ability to dole out the huge sums she rakes in from donors, she has also consistently wielded power in this cautious manner.
...(Since 1980) the Republican Party has embraced a completely opposite approach to politics. While Democrats have long seen power as something to accrue and wield responsibly, they typically do little more than hoard it. The GOP, meanwhile, seeks power at all costs and wields it with abandon. No figure in contemporary politics sums up this approach better than Mitch McConnell, who has gone to extraordinary lengths, particularly when it comes to the federal judiciary, to use his power to reshape the government. The kinds of bold gambits on which McConnell has embarkedblocking Merrick Garland from the Supreme Court is a particularly galling exampleare based on the idea that not only should power be used to the fullest extent possible, but that Republicans will more likely be punished for not acting than they will for taking aggressive action.
And in response, more often than not, Democrats are reactive, almost apologizing for what power they have. Leaders like Pelosi contort themselves to appear moderate and eager for compromise. They are terrified about any approach that looks like open, unabashed advocacy for the rights of undocumented immigrants, or restoring some degree of economic equity by (gasp) raising taxes on those who can most afford to pay them. They fear being called tax-and-spend socialists, more than they desire progressive results. And so they retreat, again and again, fearing that doing much of anything could cost them campaign contributions, and, ultimately, cost them seats. Looking over the barren landscape of recent American politics, its easy to see that this is not a particularly rewarding strategy.
More at https://newrepublic.com/article/154464/nancy-pelosi-abdicates-power
Gothmog
(145,315 posts)I wonder why there's such a big effort and deliberate campaign to damage her and subsequently the DEms
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)She certainly doesnt need advice from this hit man, quoting Poison Pen Dowd no less.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Thats funny.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)this stuff up themselves, and spread it by themselves. Writings like this are missiles in a battle.
Beyond, her history is very well documented. If you educated yourself about her (good, and fascinating, reading!), you would also have realized at first glance how absurdly dishonest this agents meme is.
Nancys record is hardly for not using her power. How on earth do you imagine shes risen to be the most powerful woman in American history? Elected by men in an era when all such positions were reserved for men?
Her power role in passing the ACA alone, against intense opposition from both sides, should be a huge clue. With Steny Hoyer have fought as hard and successfully to include coverage for pre-existing conditions? I really doubt it.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)It was also about ten years ago.
Holding Republicans accountable otoh is not something she was ever particularly good at, that is the one big thing she can accomplish in this session and she is once again not getting it done.
The article is spot-on IMO on the different approaches to power between the parties. Were in a situation now where our politics sharply diverge from reality on the ground. Minority rule. Pelosis response to the frustration people feel is basically to hippie-punch the popular new progs who are going over her head to communicate with the base. Good luck with that.
She made a terrible choice to mock the squad to a Beltway pot stirrer like Dowd. I cant believe anyone here defends it.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)for the same people, and 10 years ago the same liars were confusing the same gullible and ignorant citizens into believing this disinformation.
Its not that the Democratic Party is as representative as it should be, those who have to constantly struggle to get and keep their seats like those jobs way too much for our good. However, the typical Democrat in office believes in using government progressively of, by, and for the people. And the typical conservative in office does not. That is proven over many decades by many studies. This is not something that is not examined.
Those who dont understand that enormous, seminal difference between liberal and conservative politicians do not understand politics at all and wear their ignorance like a ring in their noses to be lead around by power-seeking scoundrels.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Point is you have to build something strong enough for them to be unable to tear it down.
We did it before and if we're to salvage this democracy of ours we can and must do it again. One way or another, the era of half-measures is coming to a close.
Me.
(35,454 posts)and why, I wonder, such a concerted effort to damn her lately? Is it the only way some can think of to build up and push AOC forward. So divisive.
leftstreet
(36,108 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)Kid Berwyn
(14,909 posts)Yet, there was acrimony.
https://www.politico.com/story/2009/02/pelosi-butts-heads-with-obama-019389
http://content.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1876912,00.html
Two years later, nada.
And the Banksters and Warmongers got away.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Trump Labor Secretary Alex Acosta resigns amid pressure from Jeffrey Epstein sex traffic case
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/12/labor-secretary-alex-acosta-is-resigning-as-pressure-mounts-from-jeffrey-epstein-case.html
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Much more than the anti Pelosi crowd here on DU that trash her on a daily basis.