Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmy McGrath backtracks on Kavanaugh: 'I would have voted no'
Rebecca Morin, USA TODAY Published 9:28 p.m. ET July 10, 2019
WASHINGTON Hours after saying she would have voted to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, Kentucky Senate candidate Amy McGrath changed her stance.
McGrath, a Democrat hoping to unseat Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in 2020, wrote on Twitter that after "further understanding" of Kavanaugh's record, she would not have voted to confirm him.
"I was asked earlier today about Judge Brett Kavanaugh and I answered based upon his qualifications to be on the Supreme Court," she tweeted Wednesday evening. "But upon further reflection and further understanding of his record, I would have voted no."
During an interview with the Louisville Courier Journal on Wednesday, McGrath said she would have voted to confirm Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. During his confirmation process, many Democrats in Congress and many progressive activists took issue with Kavanaugh's judicial record, judicial philosophy and views on the precedents of the high court -- in particular, whether he would hold respect Roe v. Wade as binding precedent in subsequent Supreme Court cases dealing with abortion.
Link to tweet
more
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/10/amy-mcgrath-backtracks-brett-kavanaugh-i-would-have-voted-no/1699651001/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 488 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amy McGrath backtracks on Kavanaugh: 'I would have voted no' (Original Post)
DonViejo
Jul 2019
OP
Yes, she needs to have positions ready on all the controvisial issues she's likely to be asked about
PoliticAverse
Jul 2019
#2
she spoke with out thinking and made a gotcha moment all be herself, kinda sad she flubbed this
beachbum bob
Jul 2019
#3
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)1. This is a rookie mistake.
She needs to get some good advisors fast and get up to speed.
Along with a lot of others, I donated to her campaign the other day. If she runs a smart campaign, I think she has a good chance of defeating McConnell.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)2. Yes, she needs to have positions ready on all the controvisial issues she's likely to be asked about
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)3. she spoke with out thinking and made a gotcha moment all be herself, kinda sad she flubbed this
so bad right out of the gate and really disappointing that this may impact her too great to recover. I thought she had better sense and was mistaken. She does not.