Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
180,000,000 times $600 ? (Original Post) questionseverything Jul 2019 OP
not taxing these benefits started under fdr questionseverything Jul 2019 #1
Who are "others"? There's hardly anyone not on either employee healthcare or medicaid/medicare. nt MadDAsHell Jul 2019 #26
Ask your favorite candidate to propose eliminating that exclusion from income. See what happens. Hoyt Jul 2019 #2
i get that it would not be popular but can we not even talk about the difference in the way people questionseverything Jul 2019 #3
It wouldn't affect me, but it would be a big change. Plus, I believe that $600 would also Hoyt Jul 2019 #5
the self employed and employees w/o benefits are already paying ss tax and income tax on their questionseverything Jul 2019 #6
I think self-employed can exclude/deduct their health insurance premiums. Hoyt Jul 2019 #8
your irs thing was from 2005...i am pretty sure the aca changed it but questionseverything Jul 2019 #10
I think it's still deductible. Obama would have been crucified if he ended that Hoyt Jul 2019 #18
i stand corrected in part...while it says the premiums are deductible not all the other expenses are questionseverything Jul 2019 #23
I get it. Time to get everyone insured under the cheapest, but quality, care we can. Hoyt Jul 2019 #24
i dont know how the self employed could be on medicaid because in illinois you can't have more than questionseverything Jul 2019 #14
I said "those without selfpayed insurance," meaning they didn't have insurance. Hence, Medicaid Hoyt Jul 2019 #15
np i apprciate the feed back questionseverything Jul 2019 #16
so is 180,000,000 times $500 $90,000,000,000? questionseverything Jul 2019 #20
Yeah, but the taxes would "only be" $18 B depending on tax brackets. Hoyt Jul 2019 #21
taxing the mega churchs would be fine with me questionseverything Jul 2019 #25
You math is so far off.Di former9thward Jul 2019 #17
that is very high dsc Jul 2019 #4
i'm just over 60 and the aca would cost my spouse and myself 1800 a month if we didnt get a subsidy questionseverything Jul 2019 #7
kids are vastly less dsc Jul 2019 #9
we are pretty much in agreement i think questionseverything Jul 2019 #11
Look at Form w2 box 12 Code dd to see cost Cicada Jul 2019 #12
i agree completely, price control is the place to start questionseverything Jul 2019 #13
You are just making up figures. former9thward Jul 2019 #19
There was a time when Orthos would make that in a week. But nowadays with Hoyt Jul 2019 #22
478120 was average salary for orthopedic surgeon last month Cicada Jul 2019 #28
I bet not many would go to business school. Medical school is all but a guarantee of Hoyt Jul 2019 #29
That is a Repulican idea brought up a doc03 Jul 2019 #27

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
1. not taxing these benefits started under fdr
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 07:50 PM
Jul 2019

maybe it is time to even the playing field

there are a couple different ways to do it

either tax the benefits or allow others to deduct the same kind of costs

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
3. i get that it would not be popular but can we not even talk about the difference in the way people
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 08:46 PM
Jul 2019

are taxed?

especially since we constantly hear how we cant afford anything

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
5. It wouldn't affect me, but it would be a big change. Plus, I believe that $600 would also
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 08:51 PM
Jul 2019

be subject to Social Security tax, not just income tax.

On the other hand, sooner or later, we all are going to have to pay more for things like universal healthcare, climate change, education, deficit and debt reduction, etc. Might as well look at everything.

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
6. the self employed and employees w/o benefits are already paying ss tax and income tax on their
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 09:09 PM
Jul 2019

healthcare insurance dollars

if there are 180 million peops with employer paid insurance then there are 140 million w/o it, getting the short end of the stick


this is one reason getting rid of private ins doesn't sound like such a bad idea to me


besides private ins gets you when you are younger and cost less while Medicare gets you when we are almost guaranteed to cost more

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
8. I think self-employed can exclude/deduct their health insurance premiums.
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 09:16 PM
Jul 2019

"Self-employed people who qualify are allowed to deduct 100% of their health insurance premiums (including dental and long-term care coverage) for themselves, their spouses, and their dependents. It’s important to understand, however, that this is not a business deduction. It is a special personal deduction for the self-employed. This deduction applies only to your federal, state, and local income taxes, not to your self-employment taxes."

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/the-self-employed-health-insurance-deduction-a-valuable-personal-deduction.html


Those without self-payed insurance are often on Medicaid, or have ACA subsidies. Those without any coverage, are the ones really screwed. If it takes taxing those who are covered to insure everyone, I'd be for that.

While you and I don't think it would be bad to get rid of private, employer based insurance, those 180 Million might, as well as a bunch of self-employed people who are too stupid to see a government run health plan should be better.

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
10. your irs thing was from 2005...i am pretty sure the aca changed it but
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 09:25 PM
Jul 2019

even if it was just the ss tax that was handled differently, it still would not be an even deal


the aca uses your income before ss taxes or income tax is paid, to figure your credit, that I am sure of

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
23. i stand corrected in part...while it says the premiums are deductible not all the other expenses are
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 11:15 PM
Jul 2019

Background on Deducting Expenses
Generally speaking, when you file your taxes, you have the option of taking the standard deduction or itemizing your deductions. The 2018 standard deduction is $12,000 for a single filer.
However, you have the option to itemize your deductions on a separate form, Schedule A, instead of taking the standard deduction on Form 1040. Itemizing deductions could save you a lot of money come tax time since you can potentially claim a deduction higher than $12,000 (if you have enough deductible expenses to itemize). Here are some of the deductions that you can itemize:
Mortgage interest
Gifts to charity
State and local income taxes
Medical expenses above 7.5% of your Adjusted Gross Income

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I just know I haven't had health insurance since they raised it to 3 grand a month a piece

the aca is tricky at 42 grand a yr I could get a high deductible policy for nothing but at 52 grand it is 18 grand a year

since when u r self employed you never know what you will make and I don't want to owe 18 grand at end for subsidies I didn't deserve

it's complicated

thanks for the civil discussion

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
14. i dont know how the self employed could be on medicaid because in illinois you can't have more than
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 09:50 PM
Jul 2019

$2000 of anything and qualify

heck the insurance I have to pay every January is more than that but it might be different in other places

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
15. I said "those without selfpayed insurance," meaning they didn't have insurance. Hence, Medicaid
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 10:35 PM
Jul 2019

might apply. I could have worded it better.

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
20. so is 180,000,000 times $500 $90,000,000,000?
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 10:48 PM
Jul 2019

I compromised at 500 because someone said 600 was too high an average

is it 90 billion bucks a month we are talking about?

these numbers are too big for my old head to be sure of

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
21. Yeah, but the taxes would "only be" $18 B depending on tax brackets.
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 10:57 PM
Jul 2019

Again, doesn’t impact me, semi-retired. But the tax rates have been built for 50 years or more incentivizing companies to offer health insurance and employees to all but demand it.

I think if we got away from employer based insurance, it would pretty much come out in the wash with increased taxes to fund single payer.

If I were going after tax income now, I’d would start with churches, many other “non-profits,” and repealing last couple of tax cuts.

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
25. taxing the mega churchs would be fine with me
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 11:29 PM
Jul 2019

I would hate to tax the tiny ones that actually try and help peops

getting rid of some of the last tax cuts goes w/o saying

former9thward

(32,025 posts)
17. You math is so far off.Di
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 10:42 PM
Jul 2019

Do you think there is 140 million without insurance? What about the people on Medicare and Medicaid? They don't count? What about children? Who is getting the "short end of the stick"?

dsc

(52,162 posts)
4. that is very high
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 08:48 PM
Jul 2019

many of that 180,000,000 million would be children who are on their parent's policy and they don't cost anything like $600. Also, I think even for the adults who are covered the $600 figure is likely high. Full price on the exchange is lower than that for a sliver plan for anyone under 60. https://www.healthcare.gov/small-businesses/shop-rates/north-carolina/

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
7. i'm just over 60 and the aca would cost my spouse and myself 1800 a month if we didnt get a subsidy
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 09:16 PM
Jul 2019

that's 900 a piece with a 6 grand a piece out of pocket

my newborn grandson cost 400 bucks a month to add to his mom's policy (and that is with her employer subsidizing it)

if you want to use 500 a month average times 180 mill we could do that...it is still a huge number to be untaxed for SOME

while others pay ss taxes and income tax on every dollar of healthcare premiums

I am simply saying it is not an even playing field

dsc

(52,162 posts)
9. kids are vastly less
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 09:22 PM
Jul 2019

and many of those 180 million are kids. Also many of us who get insurance provided don't get the whole amount provided. I think the more accurate figure is about $300 a month. I do get that there is an unfairness and that medical insurance should be able to be purchased with pre tax dollars by individuals.

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
11. we are pretty much in agreement i think
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 09:28 PM
Jul 2019

employees that have to subsidize their employer provided healthcare should get to deduct that too

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
12. Look at Form w2 box 12 Code dd to see cost
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 09:42 PM
Jul 2019

In my town a married couple both teaching, two children, the amount for 2018 $29,547.

The school doesn’t care what it’s compensation costs are for, it just cares how much it costs.,If we had a national health system wages would increase $29547. Or at least the school could increase wages that much with no change in its budget. There is a lot of money available to pay tax for national health system.

Our problem is that the cost of medical services is high. Elsewhere they have price controls. An orthopedic surgeon at Kaiser probably makes more than $500,000 a year. In Germany I bet she makes only half that much. Our hospitals get paid more too, I bet. I bet if they got paid less all who are paid by the Hospital would accept less compensation. I think we need price controls.

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
13. i agree completely, price control is the place to start
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 09:47 PM
Jul 2019

I don't know about a Kaiser surgeon but we have built houses for surgeons who would laugh at a 40,000 dollar cost, saying they make that by noon most days


shhhhhhhhhh


yes there is plenty of money it just needs moved around a lil

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
22. There was a time when Orthos would make that in a week. But nowadays with
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 11:02 PM
Jul 2019

Medicare and private insurers pretty much controlling fees, that’s tough. Some really sought after Orthos might not even enroll with Medicare or low-paying private insurers, but they are rare.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
28. 478120 was average salary for orthopedic surgeon last month
Fri Jul 12, 2019, 01:43 AM
Jul 2019
https://www.salary.com/research/salary/alternate/orthopedic-surgeon-salary

If they made $100,000 less the US would still pay more than in any other country. I wonder how many would retire. I wonder how many in college would go to business school instead of medical school.
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
29. I bet not many would go to business school. Medical school is all but a guarantee of
Fri Jul 12, 2019, 04:20 AM
Jul 2019

being in upper 1% to 5% of income. Business school, not so much unless one has some good connections to begin with.

But the days of an Ortho making $40K in half a day are long gone, unless the own surgery centers, PT clinics, X-ray and MRI facilities, have a bunch of junior docs and PAs working under them, etc.

doc03

(35,348 posts)
27. That is a Repulican idea brought up a
Thu Jul 11, 2019, 11:58 PM
Jul 2019

few years ago to screw Unions. Millionaires getting away with murder and you want to tax benefits Unions strugled decades to get!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»180,000,000 times $600 ?