General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI doubt that we will get anything useful from, Mueller. I put my hopes in him before
and was left feeling judicially castrated. I will proceed with caution for the hearing and pray that I am wrong.
Funtatlaguy
(10,875 posts)watoos
(7,142 posts)JI7
(89,249 posts)emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)watoos
(7,142 posts)The burden is on what questions the Democrats ask him. Mueller won't volunteer information but Mueller will not lie.
This hearing is Democrats to blow, they better come prepared.
stopdiggin
(11,306 posts)Whether Mueller is helpful or not is substantially under his control. He could very easily lead things to places that he thinks needed to be exposed. If he falls into the "bare minimum" scenario that you describe .. it is because HE has personally decided that information should not be shared (at least in this forum). I, personally, am making no prediction as to which path he might choose to take. But it is his path to choose.
(and all of this is, of course, set apart from any information that he thinks he cannot share)
JI7
(89,249 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,693 posts)He might not testify about anything outside the report, but good questions will require him to say plainly what his investigation found regarding Trump's acts of obstruction of justice, not to mention the fact that the Russians really did interfere with the election.
BlueTsunami2018
(3,492 posts)The problem is, few people know about it. The questioning will be key. Hes going to stick to whats in there, so get him to answer yes or no questions that bring it all out.
If you expect him to demand Тяцмр be arrested or whatever, youre going to be disappointed.
True Dough
(17,305 posts)how the ReThug stooges do their best to try to tear away at his credibility, making fools of themselves once again.
RockRaven
(14,966 posts)this country is going suffer dearly, because an incompetent handling of this hearing will vastly increase Trump's chances of a second term.
Mueller is not going to OFFER a single f-ing inch. He has made that very clear. But he is also not going to self-immolate on Trump's behalf.
The Democratic members of the committee need to be prepared to TAKE every single millimeter of ground. And to do so by asking BRIEF, DIRECT questions with SPECIFIC answers.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,693 posts)have figured that out. This isn't their first rodeo; many are former prosecutors. They'll manage.
RockRaven
(14,966 posts)and in a manner which makes them look either poorly prepared or too enamored with their own voice to make the most of their limited opportunities.
I do not think that most of those members of Congress need my advice, but I *do* think hopeful Democratic voters are going to find a) less of a savior than they were anticipating in Mueller and b) more missed opportunities than ought to have existed.
stopdiggin
(11,306 posts)And herein lies the problem with the old lawyers adage "never ask a witness on the stand a question that you DON'T know the answer to." In this case, we NEED answers and info we don't yet have. So the questions might have to be probing and experimental.
RockRaven
(14,966 posts)Better to make him say something out loud on live national television which is in the report/already known than ask him questions which he answers with a non-answer.
He's not going to be proactively helpful. So get out of him what you know you can get out of him. A video clip is worth ten thousand written words.