Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublican lawmaker claims that 'owning slaves doesn't make you racist'
Horn originally made the comments in response to a Facebook post from the former state House representative Dan Haynes, who took to the social media site to ask:
If Trump is the most racist president in American history, what does that say about all of the other presidents who owned slaves?
In response, Horn reportedly said:
Wait, owning slaves doesnt make you racist...
Writing on Tuesday, Haynes then said:
I guess not.
Which is surprising since everything else makes someone a racist.
According to USA Today, Horn then added:
It shouldnt be surprising since owning slaves wasnt a decision predicated on race but on economics. Its a business decision.
On Thursday, Hayes took a different position on Facebook, saying that "slavery in the U.S. was in fact racist", reports USA Today.
However, Horn, a three-term lawmaker, doubled down on his claims in interviews with the Huffington Post and the New Hampshire Union Leader. Speaking to the Huffington Post, he said that he thought that "slavery's not OK", however, he also said:
Human beings have been owning other human beings since the dawn of time. Its never been about race.
According to Horn, slave owners didn't consider race at the auction block, but instead, it was "an economic decision". He also added that women and children cost less than male slaves, saying:
Unless youre going to try to tell me those plantation owners were so in the dark ages that they delighted in being also sexist and ageist practicing age discrimination and sex discrimination when they bought slaves I dont see how you can say theyre being racist because they bought black slaves.
Essentially, his main argument was that slave owners were motivated by economics, meaning they weren't discriminatory.
Consolidating his argument, he said:
My comment specifically was aimed at a period of time when that was how you survived, thats how you fed your family.
It wasnt, I want to own a black person today. It was, I need to feed my family; I need five guys who can work stupidly long hours in the sun without killing themselves.'
If Trump is the most racist president in American history, what does that say about all of the other presidents who owned slaves?
In response, Horn reportedly said:
Wait, owning slaves doesnt make you racist...
Writing on Tuesday, Haynes then said:
I guess not.
Which is surprising since everything else makes someone a racist.
According to USA Today, Horn then added:
It shouldnt be surprising since owning slaves wasnt a decision predicated on race but on economics. Its a business decision.
On Thursday, Hayes took a different position on Facebook, saying that "slavery in the U.S. was in fact racist", reports USA Today.
However, Horn, a three-term lawmaker, doubled down on his claims in interviews with the Huffington Post and the New Hampshire Union Leader. Speaking to the Huffington Post, he said that he thought that "slavery's not OK", however, he also said:
Human beings have been owning other human beings since the dawn of time. Its never been about race.
According to Horn, slave owners didn't consider race at the auction block, but instead, it was "an economic decision". He also added that women and children cost less than male slaves, saying:
Unless youre going to try to tell me those plantation owners were so in the dark ages that they delighted in being also sexist and ageist practicing age discrimination and sex discrimination when they bought slaves I dont see how you can say theyre being racist because they bought black slaves.
Essentially, his main argument was that slave owners were motivated by economics, meaning they weren't discriminatory.
Consolidating his argument, he said:
My comment specifically was aimed at a period of time when that was how you survived, thats how you fed your family.
It wasnt, I want to own a black person today. It was, I need to feed my family; I need five guys who can work stupidly long hours in the sun without killing themselves.'
[link:https://www.indy100.com/article/republican-slaves-werner-horn-racism-new-hampshire-9012001|
This is where republicans are now
Send her back and Slaves - neither are racist...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 699 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republican lawmaker claims that 'owning slaves doesn't make you racist' (Original Post)
Soph0571
Jul 2019
OP
tanyev
(42,558 posts)1. Uh-oh, did he forget he's the "Party of Lincoln"??
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)2. OK, Republicans need to keep their racist
mouth shut tight.
Slaves were not even considered human, just property.
Fuck off.
DBoon
(22,366 posts)3. and being a guard at Aushwitz doesn't make you an anti-semite either, right?
Every time I think Republicans have hit rock bottom, they manage to achieve a new low