General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFox: Dem Policies Have "Infantilized" African-Americans & "Made Them Addicted To Crappy Programs"
From Media Matters:
http://mediamatters.org/video/2012/08/29/foxs-gutfeld-democratic-policies-have-infantili/189651
Fox's Gutfeld: Democratic Policies Have "Infantilized" African-Americans And "Made Them Addicted To Crappy Programs"
Video August 29, 2012 7:12 PM EDTFrom the August 29 edition of Fox News' The Five:
GUTFELD: (Utah GOP congressional candidate Mia Love is) a black conservative woman. The only thing that scares liberals and the New York Times editorial board more is Israel and an arugula shortage. This woman -- even though I love her name, it sounds like it's from a Richard Roundtree movie, Mia Love - she's the best shot the Republicans have to remind America that (Abraham) Lincoln was a Republican and that all the policies from the Democrats have done nothing but infantilize an entire race and made them addicted to crappy programs.
Video at the link.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)People are becoming addicted to eating, I hear.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)if we don't watch em.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)Politely...
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?
chowder66
(9,074 posts)Where are the facts to back this up and if you can show this what are the factual reasons and causes?
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)programs. ANd I have seen here on DU twice that there are more white people getting food stamps than black. I don't know how that works percentage wise, who uses more social programs, but they are definitely used by all races.
But the pugs hate all poor, so they will just adjust the message from African American to poor or lower class people.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Just because 61% of welfare recipients are white and 49% of food stamp recipients are white does not mean that Democrats have "infantilized" white people, just African Americans.
Republicans are going to lose bad. If the Democrats avoid doing anything monumentally stupid they should be able to keep the Presidency and the Senate and possibly take back the house.
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)I was wondering how long the Republicans would last, and how they'd go out.
I am getting the feeling we are watching the start of the end-game, for the Republicans.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Republicans are desperate. They see the writing on the wall and they are trying to salvage at least Congress. Id the Dems can take everything and quit fucking around with "bi-partisanship" then we could see a major change in the Republican party.
Of course change for the Republicans means backing off from "looney as fuck" to "just plain dickheads".
a geek named Bob
(2,715 posts)1.) the question is how desperate? Desperate enough to start a coup?
2.) there seems to be a pernicious meme of "noble loser" haunting the democrats
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Most have jobs. Most are just hard-working Americans supporting their families.
How can Faux get away with claiming an entire race of people in the United States is on government assistance when it's a total lie?
The scary part is that the Faux minions actually believe every black person is on welfare and stealing money from hard-working white Americans.
siligut
(12,272 posts)Mormonism uses mind-control, she doesn't realize she is a tool. And the fucking myth that it is AAs that make up the majority using government programs irritates me to no end and it would seem we just can't rid ourselves of this falsehood.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Of course, it's not Democrats doing that. And Abe Lincoln's Republican party was a very different animal from the GOP today.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Jennicut
(25,415 posts)this idiot also puts down arugula. I take it he never had a delicious arugula salad. Scum. And more whites are on food stamps. They spread lies without even thinking about it.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)JHB
(37,161 posts)Does Gutfeld claim those policies have been in effect for nearly 150 years?
Digital ID: (digital file from b&w film copy neg.) cph 3a41094 http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/cph.3a41094
Reproduction Number: LC-USZ62-40764 (b&w film copy neg.)
Repository: Library of Congress Rare Book and Special Collections Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA
Title: The Freedman's Bureau! An agency to keep the Negro in idleness at the expense of the white man. Twice vetoed by the President, and made a law by Congress. Support Congress & you support the Negro Sustain the President & you protect the white man
Date Created/Published: 1866.
Medium: 1 print : woodcut on wove paper ; 45.5 x 58.1 cm. (image)
Summary: One in a series of racist posters attacking Radical Republicans on the issue of black suffrage, issued during the Pennsylvania gubernatorial election of 1866. (See also "The Constitutional Amendment!," no. 1866-5.) The series advocates the election of Hiester Clymer, who ran for governor on a white-supremacy platform, supporting President Andrew Johnson's Reconstruction policies. In this poster a black man lounges idly in the foreground as one white man ploughs his field and another chops wood. Accompanying labels are: "In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat thy bread," and "The white man must work to keep his children and pay his taxes." The black man wonders, "Whar is de use for me to work as long as dey make dese appropriations." Above in a cloud is an image of the "Freedman's Bureau! Negro Estimate of Freedom!" The bureau is pictured as a large domed building resembling the U.S. Capitol and is inscribed "Freedom and No Work." Its columns and walls are labeled, "Candy," "Rum, Gin, Whiskey," "Sugar Plums," "Indolence," "White Women," "Apathy," "White Sugar," "Idleness," "Fish Balls," "Clams," "Stews," and "Pies." At right is a table giving figures for the funds appropriated by Congress to support the bureau and information on the inequity of the bounties received by black and white veterans of the Civil War.
Reproduction Number: LC-USZ62-40764 (b&w film copy neg.)
Rights Advisory: No known restrictions on publication.
Call Number: Broadside Collection, portfolio 159, no. 9a c-Rare Bk Coll
Repository: Library of Congress Rare Book and Special Collections Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA
Notes:
Title appears as it is written on the item.
Published in: American political prints, 1766-1876 / Bernard F. Reilly. Boston : G.K. Hall, 1991, entry 1866-6.