Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt Is False To Claim the Counterintelligence Investigation into Trump Is Unprecedented
It Is False To Claim the Counterintelligence Investigation into Trump Is Unprecedented
https://www.emptywheel.net/2019/08/07/it-is-false-that-the-counterintelligence-investigation-into-trump-is-unprecedented/
Theres a conceit among the frothy right that the counterintelligence investigation into Donald Trump is unprecedented. At a recent hearing with FBI Director Christopher Wray, for example, Josh Hawley set up the question this way.
Hawley: Director Wray, earlier this year I sent the FBI two letter seeking additional information about news reports that the agency, the Bureau, had opened a counterintelligence investigation of the President following the exercise of the Presidents constitutional prerogatives to direct foreign policy and otherwise oversee the Executive Branch. I did not receive a response to those letters beyond a form letter acknowledging receipt. And since I have you here and have you under oath, let me just ask you what I want to know. To your knowledge has the FBI ever launched a counterintelligence investigation into another President in American history?
Wray: I dont know the answer to that question.
Hawley: And so it would be no then, since its to your knowledge? Its fair to say youre not aware of one, personally, is all Im asking?
Wray: Its fair to say Im not aware of one.
Hawley: Is it safe to say then, to the best of your knowledge, that such a move would be and is unprecedented?
Wray: Um, well again, weve been around for 111 years, so I dont really know what is precedented or not precedented in that regard.
The question, as framed, is totally bullshit, and Democratic members of Congress should stop letting their colleagues frame what happened to Donald Trump in such a way.
The proper question is, is there precedent that a counterintelligence investigation was opened into a major party candidate (distinguishing from Eugene Debs, into whom Im sure there was a standing counterintelligence investigation through his presidential runs).
And the answer to that is simple. The precedent is Hillary Clinton.
In 2016, there was a counterintelligence investigation touching on both the Democratic and Republican candidates for President. The one into the Democrat was public. FBI managed it in ways, twice, that had an impact on the race. In addition to that CI investigation, there was also an investigation predicated in part on oppo research from the Republican party that involved the candidates interactions with foreign leaders. The latter investigation, into the Clinton Foundation, leaked. It leaked so egregiously that the Deputy Director of the FBI was fired for the leak.
<<snip>>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 623 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It Is False To Claim the Counterintelligence Investigation into Trump Is Unprecedented (Original Post)
dajoki
Aug 2019
OP
FBaggins
(26,754 posts)1. How was the Clinton Foundation investigation "counterintelligence "
Involved foreign leaders isnt the same thing.