Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
Fri Aug 9, 2019, 09:15 AM Aug 2019

Is there like a "minimum IQ requirement" to opine about politics on tv?

The reason I ask is that I have heard nearly nonstop "discussion" this morning about whether maybe, just maybe, McConnell will bow to public pressure and allow a vote on gun legislation.

As Rachel says, "Ignore what they say---watch what they DO!

Is Mitch bringing the Senate back from their vacay to consider ANYTHING?

I believe the appropriate expression is "DUH!"

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is there like a "minimum IQ requirement" to opine about politics on tv? (Original Post) Atticus Aug 2019 OP
Well, Fox News has a "maximum IQ requirement" PJMcK Aug 2019 #1
A debate over guns would help Mitch in Kentucky. kentuck Aug 2019 #2
I have not thought of that. And of course, #MoscowMitch needs to win Kentucky to save riversedge Aug 2019 #5
In most cases the requirement is any who will stir up controversy still_one Aug 2019 #3
:) No, the requirement is for lack of integrity. Hortensis Aug 2019 #4
... Me. Aug 2019 #8
I'm with Rachel. I'll wait to see what happens. blueinredohio Aug 2019 #6
Obviously not judging by what I see on TV. comradebillyboy Aug 2019 #7
They need to be entertainers and present the charade in such a way ooky Aug 2019 #9
I'm pretty sure it's in the single digits... Wounded Bear Aug 2019 #10
I consider Limbaugh a genius Dirty Socialist Aug 2019 #11

riversedge

(70,264 posts)
5. I have not thought of that. And of course, #MoscowMitch needs to win Kentucky to save
Fri Aug 9, 2019, 09:36 AM
Aug 2019

himself. That is probably all that matters at this point.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
4. :) No, the requirement is for lack of integrity.
Fri Aug 9, 2019, 09:31 AM
Aug 2019

Those who want to be invited back must be willing to push the approved themes. Those who don't do it and well have their talking-head careers cut short. Those who buck the requirement, by say, calling out a dishonest theme or lie the group is pushing for what it is, get blacklisted from all shows. I saw it happen to a regular on Morning Joe and other shows who one day had had enough of an obvious lie about Hillary and pointed out that "other" people, "of course not here" were pushing it. Gone that day from all shows, never seen again.

At least in daytime cable. Evening shows tend to have a bit more sophisticated viewers and more powerful anchors so the bias and other content control have to be less blatant.

ooky

(8,926 posts)
9. They need to be entertainers and present the charade in such a way
Fri Aug 9, 2019, 10:14 AM
Aug 2019

that viewers actually believe the nonsense until something new happens to shift the attention of their viewers to.

Dirty Socialist

(3,252 posts)
11. I consider Limbaugh a genius
Fri Aug 9, 2019, 10:54 AM
Aug 2019

A master of sophism.
He’s just fucked up.
The Fox talking heads are not so smart.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is there like a "minimum ...