General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReporter asks Trump about high-capacity magazine ban, Trump responds with...
@ddale8
Asked today about banning high-capacity magazines, Trump ended up talking about the concept of mental institution and the concept also of voter identification:
Link to tweet
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)dweller
(23,641 posts)settled for military acadamy ...
✌🏼
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)Dump proved with that ignorant screed that people with mental health issues are the ones most likely to fall victim to violence.
greatauntoftriplets
(175,742 posts)But here in Illinois, it was a Republican governor -- Big Jim Thompson -- who closed or downsized the mental health facilities. There are a few small facilities left.
msongs
(67,420 posts)the residents out on the streets. is trump blaming him?
calimary
(81,321 posts)Homelessness went up noticeably and stayed that way. Heartless, thoughtless, his conscience had myopia. Compassion much?
I remember the irony of those sanctimonious photos of him acting so pious at these Prayer Breakfasts with the religious extremists. Nauseating and galling as all-get-out. This is the same shameless heartless phony-baloney who closed the mental institutions in California, turning all those helpless people out onto the streets. How can you play holier-than-thou when youve done that?
I guess he didnt consider the least of My brethren story in Matthew 25.
cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)many of those people didn't really belong in mental institutions because they were no harm to anyone. But what was really reprehensible is that the money saved by letting harmless people out of repressive mental institutions wasn't reinvested in community mental healthcare.
What should have been done is leave some mental institutions open for those that had to be there. Create group homes with on staff psychiatrists for those that needed more supervision and create community mental health centers for those who needed health on an outpatient basis. I know these do exist but we don't have near enough mental health care for those that need it and don't have insurance. Not only that, those that do have insurance many times end up losing jobs that provide it when their mental illness becomes acute and they lose their jobs.
Aussie105
(5,401 posts)And half way though his non-answer he seems to forget what the question was.
But anyone with a functional brain would have answered either 'YES!' or 'No, the NRA won't let me!'
But yeah, every hunter needs his 100 round magazine. You might be stalking something big in the backwoods, and be confronted by hordes of brain eating zombies!
RainCaster
(10,884 posts)bearssoapbox
(1,408 posts)At least not anything that made sense to anyone that isn't a brainwashed, idiotic, sheet wearing, Trumplethinskin cultist.
IronLionZion
(45,457 posts)The only voter identification they want is if you're white you're alright, if you're brown you're illegal.
bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)Gun control is going to be linked to voter suppression efforts going into the next election.
Hope we're up for that fight...
shenmue
(38,506 posts)LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)a very complicated process that requires even more funding than institutions -- but the state never provided the resources nor did it consult with the professionals who could have made clear the benefits and pitfalls. Never considering the opinions of experts is a Reagan hallmark, and the Dumpster has elevated it to a new level.
pecosbob
(7,541 posts)A majority of those that voted against him in the Seventeenth Party Congress were dead within two years.
CaptYossarian
(6,448 posts)at least he never brought up banning Time or Newsweek. His answer was totally ad-libbed and uninformed, but he never went there.
StarryNite
(9,446 posts)I was expecting something along those lines too.
Capt. America
(2,477 posts)AlexSFCA
(6,139 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,350 posts)You can't have national security if the Senate and the Executive Branch are controlled by a hostile foreign power. You can't have national security if that hostile foreign power used its influence to aid the takeover of the Supreme Court and a significant part of the Judiciary Branch.
peggysue2
(10,832 posts)Primo patient: Donald Trump.
And yes, I've looked at it very strongly.