Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 09:52 AM Aug 2019

GOOD CHANGE: 181 CEOs say shareholder value is longer their main objective.

The Business Roundtable, a group of chief executive officers of nearly 200 major U.S. corporations, issued a statement Monday with a new definition of the “purpose of a corporation.”

* The re-imagined idea of a corporation drops the age-old notion that corporations function first and foremost to serve their shareholders and maximize profits.

* Investing in employees, delivering value to customers, dealing ethically with suppliers and supporting outside communities are now at the forefront of American business goals.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/19/the-ceos-of-nearly-two-hundred-companies-say-shareholder-value-is-no-longer-their-main-objective.html


This very positive beginning of change comes about because of employee and consumer choices, including investors and notably millennials who came of age in the callous, irresponsible laissez-faire post-1980 era and want more. What the liberal New Deal era created before the big national wave followed that with a more conservative era.

The new billionaire class were able to delay the next big wave into a new liberal era, but this is one of many, many signs, Obama's elections perhaps the largest, that it's happening in spite of them.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
4. :) Some. Others always wanted to be better but didn't have the power.
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 10:11 AM
Aug 2019

Remember the auto company executives who called for NOT riding the gravy trains over the cliff? They weren't powerful enough to force their companies to do what they were supposed to? Their choices at that time were either to continue causing trouble and be tossed overboard or to ride to the end and hop off into golden coaches with all the others.

What this indicates is a giant shift back toward more liberal ideals at the top. They won't use that word, but that's what's happening in the BIG picture.

Younger people won't remember, but prior to 1980 a relatively liberal sharing of profits through pensions and lifetime health benefits was normal. But many companies were ruined and whole industries in very bad trouble after conditions changed, including that most retirees lived much longer and healthcare that kept many of them alive for another quarter century itself became far, far more expensive. In the conservative era that followed, that disaster empowered hard-core conservatives and other greedy people, who used the new national mood to deregulate, exploit and pay as little as possible.

But that doesn't mean our business leaders didn't always include more decent people, both liberal and moderate conservative, who needed the power to swing their way again so that their beliefs could become ascendant. I believe this announcement is a huge indicator of the right kind of change, and no accident that it follows/is part of a swing of national mood away from the extreme conservatism that took hold on the right and toward increased liberalism.


pecosbob

(7,541 posts)
10. Would that it were so
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 12:33 PM
Aug 2019

Corporate entitities that refuse to be good members of the community should face action by that community at some point.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
11. Well, they say that's what's been happening, and it's costing.
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 12:47 PM
Aug 2019

Desirable employees have been increasingly avoiding predatory companies, as are investors.

This has been going on and building for a while, of course. It didn't just now happen. Added to other big-picture factors pulling the same direction, this has already lead to a power shift away from the hard right and we're seeing that now.

Note the Business Roundtable, made up of a couple hundred CEOs, has been around since the early 1970s, toward the end of the liberal New Deal era. It shifted right with the nation within the next decade, and now this new definition of purpose -- the antithesis of the laissez-faire attitudes that swept into power with reaganomics and built disastrously after -- has to be a function of change happening both within and without.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
5. Whether they are scared or whatever, this would be a good change. It's essentially how Denmark and
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 10:13 AM
Aug 2019

Scandinavian countries forge a partnership with industry, government and people.

It was not such a foreign thought in the late 60s when I remember business and economic professors -- at my conservative school -- talking of "satisfying profits" for business that considered all stakeholders, including government and communities. Nowadays, it's take what you can get right now, the hell with the long view.

ret5hd

(20,496 posts)
6. Now if they would abandon their TRUE #1 goal:
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 10:17 AM
Aug 2019

Executive officer/Board of Directors compensation/self dealing.

This move is merely a smokescreen. Their TRUE goal (for at least the last two decades) has not been shareholders. It's been themselves. Almost a "pump and dump" scheme writ large.

FBaggins

(26,748 posts)
9. Not really a change for the better companies
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 11:03 AM
Aug 2019

Most of them have been saying for years that focusing on their communities, customers, and employees is how they ensure shareholder return.

Fullduplexxx

(7,864 posts)
12. Their about to lose their sugar daddies in congress so now it's time to play to the left
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 01:16 PM
Aug 2019

In hopes that the left forgets about corporate america's stranglehold on consumers

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
13. That's not it. Business's own power is huge, easily in many ways
Mon Aug 19, 2019, 01:24 PM
Aug 2019

as big or bigger than any democratic government's, and it will continue to be.

Look at how McConnell tried to keep the economy mostly depressed with scorched-earth policies all through Obama's first term so there wouldn't be a second, and failed. Then repeated it over the second term and failed again. The recovery was doing very well under Obama, but that was in good part because, although he importantly helped where and how he could, the Republican-controlled congress couldn't control business. Business's choices of keeping wages low and not creating enough new jobs did work for McConnell, but if they thought it was in their interest to do either the Republican leadership could not have stopped them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOOD CHANGE: 181 CEOs say...