General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBoycott of Bill Maher's Show Suggested by Rep Rashida Tlaib After He Criticizes BDS
Rep. Rashida Tlaib suggested boycotting "Real Time With Bill Maher" Saturday after he called the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement she supports a "bulls purity test" during Friday's HBO show.
"Maybe folks should boycott his show," she tweeted Saturday. "I am tired of folks discrediting a form of speech that is centered on equality and freedom. This is exactly how they tried to discredit & stop the boycott to stand up against the apartheid in S. Africa. It didn't work then and it won't now."
Link to tweet
?s=20
Michigan's outspoken Democratic freshman in Congress was responding to a tweet earlier in the day by Intercept columnist Mehdi Hasan, in which he included a clip of a roundtable discussion on Maher's "Real Time" Friday criticizing BDS. Hasan wrote: "Maher rails against BDS, Palestinians, and Omar/Tlaib with an all-white panel featuring no Palestinians, no Arabs, no Muslims, no people of colour. 'Liberal' Maher."
Maher came out hard against the BDS movement Friday, calling it a "bulls purity test by people who want to appear woke but actually slept through history class."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/boycott-of-bill-mahers-show-suggested-by-rep-rashida-tlaib-after-he-criticizes-bds/ar-AAFYK4f?li=BBnbfcL
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)Just as you are entitled to your opinion, so is Mr. Maher.
question everything
(47,486 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,732 posts)on account of someone's political opinion, they are getting awfully close to violating the First Amendment, because they are a government agent trying to suppress a private citizen's free speech by punishing them for it. It's fine to argue with the opinion but not so good to suggest a boycott on account of it. I agree more with her than I do with him on the issue, but she should remember that when she speaks, she speaks as an elected representative and not just for herself.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)There are plenty of opinions held by Bill Maher that I disagree with, but he is a liberal and a religious skeptic and not ashamed to speak of either on a nationally distributed TV show, and for that he has my attention.
I agree with you though, counselor, in that the esteemed lady should know that as an elected official her words do carry the weight of a constituency and the institution of the House behind them (or perhaps 'over' them) and Mr. Maher is simply a humorist with a platform.
The often offered disparaging opinions of Bill Maher and his politics on this site are amusing, at best.
It's similar to the regular threads/comments about this or that thing an MSNBC talking head said.
They (some DU'ers I mean) hate them one minute because they said something they think is horrible, but privately applaud them the next minute because that next thing they said fits the sensibilities better.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)Hes a libertarian and often parrots right wing talking points to attack liberals.
Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)Like if you laid them all out, are you really suggesting that he is a conservative? He may be less "progressive" (or just have a different opinion on what is progressive) than you on some issues, but does that make someone not a liberal? Would Marher fit in with the republican party or even the libertarian party? I find that often times these sorts of "not a true liberal" statements are hinged on a belief that if someone doesn't believe a specific thing that a person considers to be absolutely mandatory, then that person is stripped of their "liberal" label in that person's mind regardless if the target is liberal on the majority of other issues.
It seems to be a more accurate statement would be that in your opinion Maher isn't as progressive as you are, and that maybe you believe anyone who isn't as progressive as yourself should be put in the same category as every right-wing conservative.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)not a liberal.
Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)How about his push for environmental regulations?
He is definitely anti-conservative based on his support of gay marriage, marijuana, and dislike of needless US wars. Those things all being things in which liberals and libertarians often agree on. Surely you don't count those strikes against him that puts him in the libertarian camp. He is clearly socially liberal.
What libertarian views does he hold that nullifies those views? He does support medicare for all and strong environmental regulations. Not really something libertarians of any type are known to support. I don't think I've ever seen him express any views about abolishing the IRS, making all road toll roads, ending welfare programs, taxes being theft, or anything else like that.
*My point isn't that Maher is a great guy with awesome opinions/views. I think he has some weird views and is wrong on some of the things he says. However, I don't think that disagreement makes him a right-wing libertarian.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)and his parroting of RW talking points to attack liberals make him a real liberal? Face it he's a bigoted rich white guy and not a liberal.
Bradshaw3
(7,522 posts)Your ignorance of Maher's positions and using name-calling rather than facts shows true prejudice. You were asked to explain your description with known positions he has taken and your response is more name-calling. Let's see, he gave a million dollars to Obama and a million dollars to the DNC in the 2018 elections. I'd say that is putting his money where his mouth is and - in addition to his positions - shows he is a liberal, just one who believes in free speech.
Unfortunately, political purists on here and elsewhere don't like it when inconvenient truths are pointed out about themselves and their stances. Then all they have is baseless name calling.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)And just because he has some liberal positions doesn't make him a liberal especially when he regularly bashes Democrats.
Bradshaw3
(7,522 posts)And he backs it up with his donations. Having illberal positions such as trying to shut down free speech - now that disqualifies one as a liberal. In your short time you've spent a lot of time bashing others - again, very hypocritical.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)and misogynist who parrots right wing talking points to bash Democrats disqualifies him.
Bradshaw3
(7,522 posts)He is not a bigot and anyone who thinks so is ignorant or deliberately misrepresenting because they don't want to hear inconvenient truths. You just keep smearing without proof. I and others have pointed out facts about Maher - and you respond with incessant name-calling. That just shows how wrong you are, and repetition makes it even more obvious.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)Bradshaw3
(7,522 posts)Anyone who thinks so is clearly prejudiced themselves and can't admit it.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)He attacked a 13 year old just because he was a Muslin.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)"Boys being boys." He once suggested women maybe just aren't any good at math and science. Those were a long time ago. I haven't watched him since.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Wow.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)In what way is he a bigot?
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)Chocolate Jesus in 08. If Rush Limbaugh had said that peoples heads would explode. Then there are his many bigoted statements regarding Arabs and Muslims. These are well known.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Welcome to DU lol.
Enjoy your stay.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)Heres some interesting reading for you: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/09/bill-maher-real-time-trump-islamophobia
Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)Or are you just another trouble-making, russian bot ?
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)Didnt excuse her from making a racist remark.
And pointing out that someone who is not a Democrat has made racist and bigoted statements shouldnt be discouraged on a site dedicated to supporting democrats.
Rhiannon12866
(205,467 posts)Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,467 posts)Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)But that doesnt excuse him of making racist and bigoted statements.
onenote
(42,714 posts)Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)So dont dishonestly put words in my mouth.
onenote
(42,714 posts)Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)onenote
(42,714 posts)Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)I thought on Democratic Underground we supported Democrats, not a self proclaimed libertarian and independent who regularly bashes Democrats with right wing talking points.
onenote
(42,714 posts)Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)not an independent bigoted white guy who attacks Democrats like Tlaib
Tlaib
Piasladic
(1,160 posts)happy feet
(869 posts)I don't understand your pushback?
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)I actually haven't seen him ever claim to be libertarian, but people I trust have stated he said so long ago. That being said, I've have almost always heard him describe himself as a liberal and many of beliefs fall on the liberal side. Now, if these exist, I suppose he could be a progressive libertarian or something, but I am not even sure that makes sense. I mean, if you're a libertarian because you support the freedom of people's personal lives and think the government has no right to tell people who they can marry, if they can have an abortion, etc..., and also believe in strong social programs and support concepts like medicare for all (or similar), then aren't you just a liberal?
Also, I'd say I take less issue with calling him a libertarian, and more issue with saying he's a right-wing libertarian. The right-wing label doesn't seem to fit on the vast majority of his stances.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)I have heard him argue with actual dickhead Libertarians multiple times, IIRC.
Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)I find labels like that are often times ambiguous and people all seem to have different definitions, and they can even have different meanings in different contexts (liberal democrat as an example)
Response to happy feet (Reply #87)
Mosby This message was self-deleted by its author.
ReformedGOPer
(478 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,061 posts)Light years from accurate
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)Hes a self proclaimed libertarian who leans left on most issues but leans right on others.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,414 posts)I can kind of understand where you're coming from though, given that she is an elected official with some power.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,732 posts)While it might not be actionable, it's close enough to be not such a good thing for a member of Congress to be saying. We'd be having industrial-strength hissy fits and waving the First Amendment flag if Lindsey Graham suggested boycotting Rachel Maddow.
lame54
(35,293 posts)Finest part of capatalism
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Exactly.
Va Lefty
(6,252 posts)PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)Israel has struggled against people who do not believe it has the right to exist since Palestine was ceded to them by the British Empire after the Second World War. It wasn't done well, and the problem has festered.
The Israelis really do impose an Apartheid-like system on the Palestinians.
Many of the surrounding Arab states, however, have NEVER said anything but that Israel does not have a right to exist, and have in fact attacked, bombed and done terrorist acts against Israel.
An equitable solution will necessarily be much greater in scope than a boycott of a comedian's political talk show.
Paladin
(28,264 posts)Actually, I've been boycotting Maher's show for some time---I refuse to bolster the ratings of some jerk who's clearly headed for a show on Fox "News." It will be my pleasure to continue my boycott, with Rep. Tlaib and the rest of "The Squad" in mind.
marble falls
(57,099 posts)In the aftermath of the attacks, U.S. President George W. Bush said that the terrorists responsible were cowards. In the September 17, 2001, episode, Maher's guest Dinesh D'Souza disputed Bush's label, saying the terrorists were warriors. Maher agreed, and replied: "We have been the cowards, lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That's cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, [it's] not cowardly."[4]
Despite similar comments having been made in other media, advertisers withdrew their support and some ABC affiliates stopped airing the show temporarily.[4] White House press secretary Ari Fleischer denounced Maher, warning that "people have to watch what they say and watch what they do."[5] Maher apologized, and explained that he had been criticizing U.S. military policy, not American soldiers.[6]
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)Damn! That torch must be burnt almost all the way down, don't you think?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)marble falls
(57,099 posts)sentiment I agreed with weak kneed.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)the BDS movement has, that person will be in up over the eyebrows in antisemitism. It is no more possible to separate support for BDS from the latest intense iteration of international left-wing antisemitism than it is for a trumpster to separate from white racism.
Btw, the reason anti-zionist BDS is a notably LW movement (instead of being obscured by the much larger RW antisemitism) is that RW Christians are the world's biggest zionists. The Bible says Jesus will come again AFTER the Jews return to Israel, so that for as long as Christianity has existed Christians have believed Jews must return. This has strongly affected foreign policy of all Christian-dominated nations, but in ours never more than now in this Trump/religious right period.
So pro-zionist antisemitism is mostly RW, while anti-zionist antisemitism is mostly far-LW.
My husband and I fully support the original and current rights of the Palestinian peoples, and we both want far more pressure on the RW government currently controlling Israel to force it to behave better, but NEVER through the BDS movement. I have an extremely poor opinion of Tlaib, and of Maher as well.
question everything
(47,486 posts)The Chinese have gone after more than 2 Uighurs and other Muslims. Yet, these two Congresswomen have not said a word.
Are some Muslims worth more than others?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)in support of the Uighurs, bringing international attention to their plight, perhaps Reps. Tlaib and Omar will join it.
DFW
(54,403 posts)More a Turkic people with more in common with the Turkmens of the former Soviet Central Asia than the Arabs of the Middle East, they have never much been on the radar of Islamic activists to the south or west. It is much easier to verbally attack Israel, especially as long as they have the objectionable Netanyahu as PM, than it is to attack China.
After all, it is way more comfortable to boycott El Al and Jaffa oranges than it is to boycott computers and cell phones.
question everything
(47,486 posts)IdealsAndReal42
(89 posts)It's sounds so. When Muslims are harrassed by non white /other Muslims, it sounds less important.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I get that you're not on board with boycott, divest and sanction of Israel for its treatment of its Palestinian citizens.* What "pressure" would you suggest be applied to the Israeli government in hopes of forcing it to behave better? From my observation, the Netanyahu government routinely disregards foreign (and domestic, but that's a whole nother thread) criticism of its policies and practices, so I think political pressure doesn't work very well, if at all. I would be interested to hear what specific actions you think would be effective in making Israel behave better that don't include boycott, divestiture or sanction.
*In answer to the question posed in a response downthread, I'd guess that Rep. Tlaib has a particularly personal interest in Muslims in Palestine because that's where her family is from.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)knows it's not just hot air "pressure" (with your quotation marks).
The Republican Party, and Trump himself, currently desperately need the support of the religious right and have no intention of slacking support of Netanyahu's government or of Israel itself. "Bibi" knows that as well as anyone.
The Democratic Party can and would, has in the past, but as elected representatives in a democratic republic, there are limits to just how much pressure could realistically be applied. Certainly enough to hurt and force some accommodations, but imo, Sanders' claim is pure hot air -- in office, he couldn't come through on it. Congress holds the pocketbook, and conservatives will always be a force that much be considered even if we have majorities at the moment.
What everyone needs is for Israel's voters to remove their RW party from power. Wherever hard-core RWers get in power, abuses and persecutions follow. The only answer here and abroad, always, is to keep them out of power, "them" meaning hard-core conservatives. That these are Jewish is irrelevant. Hard-core conservative anythings would be just as bad or worse. Look at any nation in grave trouble to check that one out. Even supposedly LW governments like Venezuela's that are in trouble have hard-core conservatives in power.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)These conversations can get reactive fast, and I wanted to use the very word you used so as not to overstate or understate what you had said.
If I read your response correctly, the Republicans and Trump can't do anything against the Netanyahu government because Netanyahu knows any criticism they might have of his government is toothless. I tend to agree with that. As to the Democrats, you acknowledge there are limits to anything they might realistically do, which I also tend to agree with. Unfortunately, after we've run through the Republicans and the Democrats, we're pretty much out of political options as a country; which leaves individual actions by private citizens. You conclude by saying that it's up to Israel's voters to remove their right wing party from power, which they have been unable or unwilling to do for several elections. I'm not sure that's a very promising avenue for change.
Is there anything you think U.S. citizens could or should do, ruling out BDS?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)to do whatever we want, and therefore have a duty to fix everything, are very foolish. That's not you, of course, but it's certainly many here. Others have power also. The good people of Israel are now in the same position we are -- we didn't understand the risk of rising RW extremism and do what we had to to keep our nations from catching fire. And now it's joined by rising LW extremism.
This BDS movement may have had good intentions in the beginning, but it provided cover for antisemitism and very quickly attracted those inclined to it, and those are far more passionately against the Jewish state than for the Palestinians they claim as their cause. So it's no more the answer for good people than Trump is for those who sincerely want to restore prosperity to farmers and coal country. Also, for various reasons, including U.S. RW zionists, it's doomed to burn hot and then fail, and rightfully so.
As for what we can do, what do you think? I have no magic answers unless the only big answer and duty we have turns out to be magic: Above all vote for the strongest liberal-dominated party available, failing that the strongest moderate conservative party. The U.S. is extremely fortunate to have a very strong, united liberal party that is THE alternative to what has become a RW extremist Republican Party. Many do not.
You smile, maybe, when you ask me to provide answers the international community hasn't, but I'm sure of that at least. We had 75 years of peace and prosperity both because of our previously liberalism-dominated government and because a working center made up of both parties had managed to keep today's dangerous extremism in check.
jrthin
(4,836 posts)the reason you listed in your post. Also, he does us more harm than good.
theaocp
(4,241 posts)He also enables scum like Coulter to thrive. There's no need to have these fuckwads on his show. He gives them an audience to spout their bile. No more platforms. Sick of his tripe.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Maher is the one that brought up BDS and drove the conversation there.
Betsy Woodruff and the NYT Reporter both made good points about the tough spot this issue will put the Dems in for 2020. Trump's already openly lying that Democrats hate Israel and Jews.
BDS will not make Likud and it's coalition come to the negotiating table with Hamas. They have no need; Trump and the GOP bend over backwards to kiss their ass, and that's who has power. The right wing in Israel LOVE Trump.
A Dem President might be mildly critical of Settler Policy behind closed doors, but threatening Israel's aid? A cold day in hell before that happens...
FreeLookMode
(30 posts)Being a dick is being a dick. It doesn't suddenly get sexy just because someone identifies as a liberal.
question everything
(47,486 posts)Seems that boycotting is the congresswoman's modus operandi.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1017550324
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)I really hate his anti Muslim bigotry.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)All with the same imaginary Sky Dad.
If it gets special attention from Maher, it's because of the lack of modernity & general misogyny that are prominent features (yes, they're integral to Judaism and Christianity, too. I'm aware.) of it's contemporary practice. I'm not a fan of the Hijab and Burkhas, either, but I tolerate them and so does Maher.
His point on Friday was that I/P is not a 1-way street, and he thinks the BDS movement wants to make it appear that it were. Israelis are not evil incarnate, and Palestinians are not pure innocents.
There has been awful, intolerable violence on both sides. Palestinians have used terror for decades. He quoted a BDS activist saying Israel had no right to exist - which is music to Trump's 2020 ears.
I think he goes over the top sometimes, sure. The Panel sure felt uncomfortable, but there has to be Palestinian compromise on Israel's existence at some point, or the situation will remain in unacceptable stasis.
MurrayDelph
(5,299 posts)but mostly Islam.
I gave up my HBO when he was going after the kid with the clock.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Oh, yeah: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Mohamed_clock_incident
I don't remember Maher "going after" the kid. What did he say? Like "It was reasonable"?
You deprived yourself of GoT because of Real Time?
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)....who are attempting to rewrite American law.
Is that something you just totally disregard?
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)I watched his movie.
I find his Islamophobia to be beyond acceptable. Also, I haven't noticed Tlaib wearing a hijab or burqa. I certainly can't blame her for sympathizing with the people that her own family came from.
I personally support BDS because only one party to the conflict has been living under perpetual occupation and dispossession for over 50 years. There were times when the black South Africans weren't all that well behaved either.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)I was saying that his opinions are not far out of the mainstream of American thought on I/P. Hell, even the mainstream of thought on DU. BDS is not going to be in our Party's platform. I pray we're not foolish enough to hand that issue to Trump.
Is Maher an asshole? Sometimes. Is Maher an Atheist? Sure. What respect does Atheism owe any Monotheism? Does Monotheism respect Atheism? History would suggest it does not.
Of the 3 Monotheisms, Islam has had the least reform, the least tolerance of Secularism. Calling that out as a problem for the 21st century isn't "Islamophobia". Saying "I hate all Muslims" or "Muslims can't be American" is. Maher hasn't said those things - that I'm aware of. So I don't know what "Islamophobia" you (or lots of DUers) find "beyond acceptable". Do you have some egregious example to share?
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)All day long.
But don't dare say anything against Islam., lest you be labeled an Islamophobe.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Fuck religion. All of it. Including supposedly poor widdle oppressed Islam. They have an entire region where they are allowed to oppress women, murder gays, and spout their phony bullshit hypocrisy. And too many here look the other way. It's what Alabama, Missisippi and Kansas want to be.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Most of his show is spent ripping Republicans and their obsession with imposing Maria Law.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)It's okay to talk as much shit as one wants about Christians but woe be unto the person who says anything less than glowing about Islam.
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)I would not watch his show for anything, have not for a long time. I cannot stand him. I did like his movie about religion but that was the las I saw of him. His tactics stink and he is a horrible misogynist. It has been years since he had any influence and his love for the creepy RW assholes he forever puts on his shows cements everything I believe about him. He goes where he can get his face in the media and his pockets full. Asshole. Edit: Oh yeah I forgot to add BIGOT
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)I'll buy my ticket in your honor.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)several years back and it was a witty and enjoyable show. Also the ticket cost were reasonable.
Hope you can attend and enjoy.
MuseRider
(34,111 posts)I would expect that!
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)I have watched his show off and on since the movie you liked (Religulous), and it's not a pronounced feature of his act or the show.
Yes, he doesn't like the Hijab, but lots of Feminists don't like the Hijab, either.
Are there any Me-Too issues with his off-camera behavior that I'm unaware of?
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)I stopped watching him when he called tailhook "boys being boys," and said that maybe women just aren't good at math and science. I'm not surprised others say he's misogynist, too.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)others on this thread are making binary judgments and serious accusations, but very few of them actually watch the show.
they, like you, saw something that offended them and started their own boycott.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)On two shows. Then, I stopped watching him, so I don't know what all else he's said. But from time to time, he's quoted here saying other obnoxious things, so I doubt he's stopped being a misogynist creep.
jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)superpatriotman
(6,249 posts)You just made his point perfectly.
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)still_one
(92,217 posts)VarryOn
(2,343 posts)jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)He spends as much time trashing Democrats as he does Trump and so far this year has spent large portions of each show I've seen coddling conservative guests.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)He has a lot of the same frustrations as I do.
He doesn't oppose Democratic policy. He gave a million dollars to the party in 2016.
"Coddling" Consevatives is engaging in debate. He, and the other guests, have no issue calling bulshit on bullshitters. It's the point of the show.
kimbutgar
(21,157 posts)He has a consistent bias against Muslims which I dont agree with. But Id rather have him on our side anyway.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)And if you like Bill Maher then you are very likely also an asshole.
(and he's also an anti-science kook who doesn't believe in germ theory.))
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)People have a whole lot of opinions on Ol' Bill.
I've heard him say some Anit-Vaxx stuff IIRC. Can you point me at where he's showed disbelief for germ theory?
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)He's also got some weird HIV/AIDS denialist ideas.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)and he was immediately challenged on it, too?
he MIGHT have changed his opinions in the intervening 16 years. maybe not, I don't know. he doesn't have kids, so he can't harm anyone - except by spreading misinformation.
but I understand why you'd want to dismiss everything else he's said about any other topic since.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)are all more recent and in fact ongoing. Considering what a shitbag he is I am kind of surprised anyone who considers themselves remotely "liberal" is defending him.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)I have not seen anything stupid other than the anti-vaxx comments, years ago.
I've never seen "HIV Denialism", and I don't even know what that is.
I've never seen racism, misogyny, Islamophobia or transphobia from him on his show. He criticizes Islam, but that isn't Islamophobia. I suppose that accusation comes from his support of anti-Hijab/Burkha laws in France?
The accusation that anyone who defends Maher isn't a Liberal reflects poorly on you. Maher is a Liberal. I'm a liberal. I don't have purity tests. Lots of people on this thread do.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/bill-mahers-greatest-racist-hits/5935ab910fc9a6317ba8c89a?latest_videos=1
https://www.thedailybeast.com/bill-mahers-transphobia-problem
there is a LOT more on the same vein; the fact that you want to defend this guy says quite a lot about your personal blind spots.
gulliver
(13,186 posts)Anything else would be unfair and undemocratic.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Maher is very clearly an islamaphobe, but suggesting boycotts will only strengthen him. He doesn't have advertisers on HBO.
walkingman
(7,627 posts)skip fox
(19,359 posts)elocs
(22,582 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,356 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,395 posts)And frankly Im more concerned Democrats in Congress are reading The Intercept than anything Maher said. Did anyone see the hit job that Putin rag did on Amy McGrath last weekend? Glenn and his not so merry band of insufferable fuck faces are carrying a lot of water for TrumpGOP these days.
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)BlueTsunami2018
(3,492 posts)Maybe she should go on the show herself and defend her position.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)Lets see if he does.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)It's one of the show's attractions.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)President Sociopath says it all the time: "Well, we'll see what happens".
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)of Maher has her on.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)We're going to see if he steps up to your challenge.
If he doesn't, you'd better boycott his show more than you currently do.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)But maybe a personal challenge for Maher to prove that he has the courage and integrity.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)"Maher would have to invite her. Lets see if he does."
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)Its up to him.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)You'd better email him and let him know he's on notice.
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)And why would I email him? Thats just silly.
RelativelyJones
(898 posts)Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)a rich bigoted white guy who in not a Democrat and regularly parrots right wing talking points to bash Democrats and liberals versus a Democratic and progressive women of color.
Response to Life_Long_Democrat (Reply #63)
Post removed
Bradshaw3
(7,522 posts)lapucelle
(18,268 posts)Would you like a snack?
Life_Long_Democrat
(81 posts)but just ate lunch.
lapucelle
(18,268 posts)evertonfc
(1,713 posts)I love Bill. He packs the house when he comes to Nashville. He's a solid liberal but does speak his mind. HBO dosent seem to care. If you see h live, have thick skin. He goes after every single religious faith
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)because he is not someone I respect. Like a stopped clock, he gets something right every once in a while. THIS was NOT one of those rare times.
I saw this episode and it really pissed me off.
Approving settlements in occupied territories is an act of war. That is what Netanyahu's Israel is doing.
I have been to Israel and have seen these settlements for myself. - and that was BEFORE all the new ones, I am not Palestinian, but I WAS outraged.
To their credit, many Israelis are too.
Bettie
(16,110 posts)but I do understand why she'd be frustrated with him.
I find him to be a mixed bag. I agree with a lot of what he says, but he has a few areas where disagree is a very mild word for how I feel about his views and comments.
And he likes Ann Coulter, ick.
samir.g
(835 posts)Representative Tlaib is right.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)He did not support Zionist Apartheid. He opposed the notion that the PLO/Hamas are complete innocents and that BDS is an appropriate tactic for the Democratic Party to support in 2020.
He (and I) don't want to hand Trump a club to beat our nominee with.
Joe941
(2,848 posts)I watch him maybe a couple times a month.
Celerity
(43,408 posts)him is no skin off mine.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)Behind the Aegis
(53,959 posts)EllieBC
(3,016 posts)I am so shocked she would boycott speech she doesn't agree with. "The Squad" is starting to behave like goons.
DFW
(54,403 posts)No way I'd boycott a show like Maher's. He is a sharp-witted satirist, and an equal opportunity opponent of religion, which I like and agree with. As long as Tlaib and her friends have zip city to say about boycotting Myanmar for its treatment of its Muslim Rohingya or China for its treatment of Muslim Uighurs, I have no patience for (or interest in) the BDS show. I don't lump all Israelis in one pot due to Netanyahu any more than my wife lumps all Americans (including me) in one pot due to Trump.
Although we've never been to Israel or China, that is due to lack of time, not because some group with an agenda says we need to conform to their PC conditions. I'll stick to boycotting the NRA and Chick Fil-A (or however it's spelled).
dsp3000
(486 posts)Israel is one of our allies, like it or not. We should be engaging with them, not encouraging what tantamounts to a form of economic sanction. I do not agree with what Israel is doing to the palestinians but a boycott is not going to be productive.
eissa
(4,238 posts)Maher mocks all religions (rightly so) and points out that some are stupider than others (again, rightly so.) Tlaib is grating.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Not one bit.
this kind of stuff is ridiculous
comradebillyboy
(10,154 posts)Ditto for Omar. I don't really have too much of a problem with their politics but they say a lot of impolitic things that detract from the message they want to get out.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Sorry, not interested.
comradebillyboy
(10,154 posts)embrace BDS. But some anti-BDS legislation in states like Texas can be quite overbearing.
https://www.newsweek.com/teacher-fired-refusing-sign-pro-israel-document-1262083
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)True.
comradebillyboy
(10,154 posts)IcyPeas
(21,884 posts)I like the panels and variety of guests (even the guests I can't stand) where else would you see and hear some of these people?
Maher is a comedian/talk show host, like him or not, he's not a politician.
Raine
(30,540 posts)no way!
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Yes, Im against it when they throw a tarp over a woman like a motorboat. Have you ever tried one of those things on? Its stifling, Maher said of the burka. Men make women walk around all day in a fucking voting booth so [men] dont have to be responsible for their erections. Your move, #MeToo.
lordsummerisle
(4,651 posts)that if agree with someone all the time about everything, then you might be an idiot...
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,021 posts)Unfortunately the liberal talk station is no more in my area so I haven't heard her show in years.
Raine
(30,540 posts)sounds about right!
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)And their anti-LGBT, anti-choice, pro-prayer in school bullshit.
But god forbid he spend five minutes critiquing someone else's fundies. Then he fails the purity test.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)underpants
(182,826 posts)I don't agree with him but that's the point. It's easily the most intelligent political talk show on TV.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Vinca
(50,276 posts)He has good guests and usually makes me laugh. Most of the time I agree with him and you have to admire the guy for being sued by Trump and, during the proceedings, Trump producing a birth certificate to prove he isn't an orangutan.
themaguffin
(3,826 posts)Polybius
(15,428 posts)I'll watch him more now.