Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri Aug 31, 2012, 09:59 AM Aug 2012

Mitt Romney's empty speech (updated)

Mitt Romney's empty speech

by Jed Lewison

For my money, the most entertaining video clip from last night's clown show in Tampa was the stunned reactions of NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams and Andrea Mitchell after Clint Eastwood all but told President Obama to go ** himself while interviewing an empty chair:

<...>

But while Clint Eastwood may have stolen the show by attempting to interview an empty chair, the emptiest thing on stage last night was Mitt Romney's speech. The first half of his speech was basically a list of things Romney wishes were on Wikipedia page, but notably absent was any discussion of his record as governor. Romney did brag about having tapped a female to be his lieutenant governor and chief of staff, but there was nothing more than that—no mention of Romneycare, no mention of his jobs record (he was 47th out of 50 states in job creation, so it's hard to blame him for that).

Romney's speech didn't just sanitize his political and business careers, it also sanitized his policy proposals. In the more than 4,000 words in his speech, he offered virtually no specifics on the central issue of this campaign: how to grow the American economy. Aside from self-serving platitudes like "in America, we celebrate success—we don't apologize for success," here is grand total of what Romney said on the topic:

I have a plan to create 12 million new jobs. Paul Ryan and I have five steps. First, by 2020, North America will be an energy independent by taking invented of our oil, are coal, our gas, our nuclear, and renewables. Second, we will give our fellow citizens the skills they need for the jobs of today and the careers of tomorrow. When it comes to the school your child will attend, every parent should have a choice, and every child should have a chance. Third, we will make trade work for America by forging new trade agreements, and when nations cheat in trade, there will be unmistakable consequences. And fourth, to assure every entrepreneur and every job creator that their investments in America will not vanish, as have those in Greece. We will cut the deficit and put America on track to a balanced budget. And fifth, we will champion small businesses, America's engine of job growth. That means reducing taxes on business, not raising them. It means simplifying and modernizing the regulations that hurt small businesses the most, and it means we must rein in skyrocketing cost of health care by repealing and replacing Obamacare.

Even that was impossibly vague. He wants to replace Obamacare? Okay, but with what? He wants to be energy independent by 2020? Okay, how? He wants to maintain confidence in the stability of American investments? Alright, how? There will be consequences for nations that break trade agreements? Okay, name some. He'll give Americans the skills they need to get a good job? Great idea ... please, tell us more. (And by the way, does that mean Mitt Romney blames American skills for slow economic growth?)

Romney followed up those five points with the most specific policy promises in his entire speech, though two of the three had nothing to do with the economy, and the passage as a whole featured one of the strangest non-sequitors I've ever seen in a speech like this.

Today women are more likely than men to start of business. They need a president who respect and understand what they do. And let me make this clear. Unlike President Obama, I will not raise taxes on the middle class of America. As president, I'll respect the sanctity of life. I'll honor the institution of marriage.

That's really an amazing jumble of words. Romney goes from claiming women are more active in business creation than men to pledging not to raise taxes on the middle class to pledging to be "pro-life" to pledging to be anti-gay marriage. Even if you didn't know that Romney's tax plan would raise taxes on the middle class (or explode the deficit) and even if you didn't know that Romney had just said abortion was a settled issue and that it shouldn't be in the political campaign, this was a real head-scratching portion of his speech—why in the world would he include a call to respect women, a pledge to not raise taxes, a pledge to repeal Roe v. Wade, and a pledge to oppose gay marriage all in the space of 56 words? It really was just weird.

On foreign policy, the speech was no better. Romney thanked President Obama for getting Osama bin Laden, but lambasted him for allegedly apologizing for America. Yeah, I'm sure bin Laden took that apology real well. Romney hinted that he wanted to go to war over Iran, but he completely avoided discussion of Afghanistan, the one war in which we are currently embroiled.

Compare Romney's speech with President Obama's 2008 convention speech. President Obama's speech was longer, by about 600 words, but it also was less about him. Romney's speech dwelled ad nauseum on his own personal biography; Obama also talked about his personal story, but spent much less time on it. Instead, the speech was about us, and what kind of country we want to be. And his speech wasn't just about principles—it was about specifics. Whether it was health care reform, getting Osama bin Laden, developing alternative energy, or expanding educational opportunity, then-Senator Obama talked about what he wanted to accomplish and how he wanted to accomplish it. In that important sense, his speech was dramatically different from Mitt Romney's.

Perhaps the most revealing line from Mitt Romney last night was this:

This isn't something we have to accept. Now is the moment when we can do something. And with your help, we will do something.

Yes, we need to do something. But what might that something be? Well, Mitt Romney doesn't want to tell you. Because he's afraid it might hurt his campaign. And you can't blame him for that, can you? After all, he's running for office, for Pete's sake.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/31/1126266/-Mitt-Romney-s-empty-speech


Updated to add:

9 Important Omissions From Romney’s Convention Speech

By Igor Volsky and Pat Garofalo

Mitt Romney’s acceptance speech at the Republican Convention was long on biography but short on policy...for a candidate who chose Paul Ryan as his running mate to signal a willingness to take on big challenges, Romney spent precious few — if any — words discussing some of the country’s most pressing problems and even less time explaining how a Romney/Ryan administration would solve them:

0 mentions of Financial Reform: Even as millions of Americans struggle with the effects of the Great Recession caused by Wall Street malfeasance and scores of others continue to deal with the fallout of the foreclosure fraud scandal, Romney has said that he will repeal the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law, but has yet to detail what, if anything, he would put in its place.

0 mentions of Climate Change: “President Obama promised to begin to slow the rise of the oceans and heal the planet,” Romney said to loud laughter. It’s too bad that he and most of the GOP delegates don’t believe in the very real threat of global warming.

0 mentions of Immigration: “We are a nation of immigrants,” Romney said, without explaining how he would help the 12 million undocumented immigrants in the United States. Romney has not said if he would rescind Obama’s temporary directive permitting young undocumented immigrants to work in the country, though his advisers have suggested that he would.

0 mentions of Romneycare: The convention speakers didn’t tackle Romney’s greatest accomplishment as governor, the enactment of universal health care coverage in Massachusetts. Romney promised to repeal Obamacare, but did not say what he would replace it with.

- more -


Trust Mitt: Releasing his tax returns would be "damaging" and policy details would be "suicidal"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021151118







Note:

Kos Media, LLC Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt Romney's empty speech (updated) (Original Post) ProSense Aug 2012 OP
Empty speech, empty chair, empty suit for a candidate. CanonRay Aug 2012 #1
Being vague is hard work. n/t ProSense Aug 2012 #2
thanks ProSense for all the great & informative threads Voice for Peace Aug 2012 #3
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mitt Romney's empty speec...