General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere is no bump.
Not from selecting Ryan to be his running mate.
Nor from the convention.
Romney didn't lower his unfavorable rating at all.
America still doesn't like him.
Pandering to disaffected liberals who voted for President Obama in 2008 was scrapping the bottom of the barrel.
And, on top of all that . . . Romney still has to release his income tax returns.
As Colonel Klink would say,"Disssssmissssed!"
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)nah it's still going to be a thud.
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)Onceuponalife
(2,614 posts)Mittens.
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)I haven't seen any polls out since the speech last night.
Coexist
(24,542 posts)Ashleyshubby
(81 posts)Obama's lead on August 12th was 4.7%. It is now 0.5%.
August 12 is when the pick of Ryan was made public.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
speedoo
(11,229 posts)First, the Ryan pick was 18 days ago and that is a lot of time. Other things have happened, including their convention.. You'd have to do a more careful analysis to detect any bump from ether event. I'm satisfied with Nate Silver's analysis that there was a minimal bump (maybe 1%) from the Ryan choice and I will accept whatever he says re. Their convention, but I will be surprised if it's anything substantial.
Meanwhile there has been a lot of good news from the battleground state polls since the Ryan choice and overall Silver has Obama in better shape since then.
Ashleyshubby
(81 posts)What happened between Ryan's pick and the Convention that you hypothesize was responsible for the bump?
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Ashleyshubby
(81 posts)Did I? And do you have proof that excluding Rasmussen has any effect in the polling average?
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)I don't mean to argue with you about it.
I'm a professional procrastinator.
I know what I'm talking about.
dawg
(10,624 posts)If Nate Silver's now cast doesn't have Romney in the lead by Tuesday, it'll take something really special to give him any chance at all in November.
jillan
(39,451 posts)rocktivity
(44,576 posts)If Mitt releases his tax returns!
rocktivity
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)That could turn out to be the mystery variable in this whole election.
I might have to reconsider the effects of that on the race now.
spanone
(135,844 posts)edhopper
(33,589 posts)And look at the rolling popular vote chart on the right, you will see there has been no real movement in the numbers.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/author/nate-silver/
B Calm
(28,762 posts)and I drive a truck 3,000 miles a week.
ananda
(28,866 posts)nt
Lex
(34,108 posts)pretty much everything.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)tends to repug? i heard that about a week ago
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Because he was really, really secretly hoping that Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Georgia, and Florida could suppress the Democratic vote in those states.
Rasmussen is a regular contributor on Faux Snooze.
His point was that registered voters don't always get excited enough to want to go vote.
So, he decided a few years ago to only count those registered voters he considered were also "likely to vote".
But, I don't know how he determines that.
I'm voting by mail this year so I can cast my vote as early as possible in this year's election.